Colgan 3407 NTSB Hearings
#181
I am not saying that increased pay/retirement benefits would have prevented this accident. I was addressing the issue that was brought up earlier, on this forum and in the media that the last 7 fatal crashes took place at the regional level and that pay/retirement (and fatigue for that matter) was a topic of interest to the NTSB and the public. Yes, it's hard to believe that pilots start out making $20,000 a year, and maybe that is preventing the industry from attracting the best and brightest. It was brought up in front of congress by Captain Sully and it is being brought up again.
I have no doubt in my mind that the Captain and FO did everything they can to prevent this from happening. My condolences go out to there families and I hope the victims of this tragedy rest in peace.
I have no doubt in my mind that the Captain and FO did everything they can to prevent this from happening. My condolences go out to there families and I hope the victims of this tragedy rest in peace.
Not to mention the almost fatal CAL DEN crash when a highly experienced Captain decided to correct the FO being off centerline with the tiller during the T/O roll. That turned out just wonderful...
#182
That is not true. If you have no union you are an at will employee and can be fired for ANYTHING. If you have a union, you are waiving the lawsuit route and can have a disciplinary grievance. At my old company (an American Eagle), they fired a guy for calling in sick too often, making him an "unreliable employee". That tag stuck through the arbitration and I believe stayed fired.
#183
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Lets clear a few things up here....been using the web longer than 7 years(reread my post)that applied to reading stuff from this forum.....and had no need to use my ISP registered email until now. I could never get my ISP email to work being that the name that they had registered for my isp email was spelled so horribly incorrect; it did not match the spelling of my name, nor the spelling of my name on the account. Makes it kind of tough to figure out your email to login. I have had an email address from a free account for as long as I can remember, and that has served me just fine.
After reading my initial post, how did you infer that I am trying to dig up dirt on these guys...in fact, being that I wrote the post, I know I was trying to do the EXACT OPPOSITE. Seriously, did you even read my post?
After reading my initial post, how did you infer that I am trying to dig up dirt on these guys...in fact, being that I wrote the post, I know I was trying to do the EXACT OPPOSITE. Seriously, did you even read my post?
#184
I like how our safety guy morgan says we have no more than 3 stand up overnights yet last month two lines had 4 in a row every week. Shows how in touch our management is and also that he doesn't think a 16 hour duty day is too long or unsafe.
#185
My point though, is that the FAA cannot mandate pay increases. It can, however, mandate tests that are harder and are a better judge of true proficiency. This in turn MAY lead to higher salaries as weaker pilots are weeded out and airlines are forced to pay more to find better qualified individuals.
STANDARDS... real ones.
How about grades on check rides instead of "pass/fail"?
How many times have you pulled your training partner thru a type rating and at the end even on his checkride you pull him through; the examiner glaring at you not to do anymore, but then he passes?? Me?? guilty.. 3 of 7 initial courses I pulled my partner through on. It's not PC to say, but some people just don't belong in airplanes at a "professional" level (when the poop hits the fan)..
Take someone who's been thru 5-8 aircraft type courses and passed every check ride and every recurrent with nothing close to resembling a marginal performance.. then taken 3 years off from touching any airplane, sim or currency aid... then passed his an initial thereafter in one of the hardest types to get. The military has a lot of people like this after a 20 year career, as do some of us less fortunate pilots with 5 jobs in 12 years... and contrast that same person to someone who's failed every 3rd checkride and all of their initial courses working at ONE employer their entire career (the Colgans, Mesa's and other 250 hour, now CA types we hear all about)... who would you rather fly with?
Well people... BOTH of them are out there flying, so roll the dice!
#186
Negative ghost rider. Unless American 587(260 fatalities)in NYC, and American 1420(12) in LIT are counted as regionals.
Not to mention the almost fatal CAL DEN crash when a highly experienced Captain decided to correct the FO being off centerline with the tiller during the T/O roll. That turned out just wonderful...
Not to mention the almost fatal CAL DEN crash when a highly experienced Captain decided to correct the FO being off centerline with the tiller during the T/O roll. That turned out just wonderful...That is likely what 'seven6' is referring to.
I don't think anyone would say that 'regionals' are up to the same standard as majors/mainline: more resources, better safety culture, more experienced crews, and even safer destinations (radar environments, precision approaches, etc) - a major is a better operation.
Hopefully industry and unions will remember that 'one level of safety' is not just a 'cargo' and 'passenger' thing, but is also something that should be seen as applicable to the various levels of passenger carriers. All could use improving, though. There is never a perfect operation.
Last edited by Sniper; 05-13-2009 at 11:43 AM. Reason: added text
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



