Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Rah 190's Confirmed For Midwest >

Rah 190's Confirmed For Midwest


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Rah 190's Confirmed For Midwest

Old 05-24-2009 | 04:31 PM
  #281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default

I find it curious that so many of you will come on this website and bash an RAH pilot. I'm fly for RAH. Read my posts. I don't want the 190s. I'm asking all of you to give me a defense to stop this from happening. But you can't. You avoid my question! My asking for assistance in this delima we are in. Instead, you call me a scab and say how much better you are and that your management would never do this! Well, when they have the opportunity, they will. What will you do?
Old 05-24-2009 | 05:26 PM
  #282  
320ToBearz's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gmcd05
And after a major screwing given to skyway pilot's by the midwest pilot's group, how can you be so indignant about this? Back then, what were you trying to do?
*** are you talking about? Please give ANY specific example. Midwest hired half of its pilots from Skyway (tons more than Delta, AA, US Air, or Continental did with it's wholly owneds). We then offered to management to place ALL Skyway pilots on our seniority list.

So where is the "screwing"?
Old 05-24-2009 | 05:31 PM
  #283  
320ToBearz's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ratherbeoffwork
Instead, you call me a scab and say how much better you are and that your management would never do this! Well, when they have the opportunity, they will. What will you do?
Hey Repugnant. When has ANY midwest pilot said our management wouldn't do this? Quite the contrary, we know they are enemy #1, you are simply their enablers.

Hoeks-a-bucks' ego has ruined our airline, pure and simple. Now his ego is destroying our, meaning ALL pilots, careers. That is who you are flying your 190's for.
Old 05-24-2009 | 05:51 PM
  #284  
Fly Gal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: 737 right
Default

2 airplanes doesnt make any sense from a planning point of view. You will see more on the way.
Old 05-24-2009 | 08:23 PM
  #285  
stoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: bar stool
Default

But it's not about the money, but the love of flying, right guys?
Old 05-25-2009 | 04:16 AM
  #286  
Fly Gal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: 737 right
Default

Originally Posted by stoki
But it's not about the money, but the love of flying, right guys?
That's what the Citabria is for!
Old 05-25-2009 | 04:58 AM
  #287  
Jake Wheeler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: RJ driver
Default

Originally Posted by Ratherbeoffwork
I find it curious that so many of you will come on this website and bash an RAH pilot. I'm fly for RAH. Read my posts. I don't want the 190s. I'm asking all of you to give me a defense to stop this from happening. But you can't. You avoid my question!
They won't give you an answer for two reasons. One, there isn't one. Sure, you can quit, but someone else will be hired and someone else will fly it. Aircraft purchases are a management decision just as is the decision to outsource, wholly-own or withdraw from the market. Second, they are part of the problem. It is foolish to blame someone else for their own failure to negotiate an effective scope clause or when they give up scope restrictions for other contract concessions.

The problem isn't you or RAH, Ratherbeoffwork. The problem is the Deregulation Act of 1978. There is no fix for it.
Old 05-25-2009 | 05:02 AM
  #288  
Jake Wheeler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: RJ driver
Default

Originally Posted by 320ToBearz
As far as the 717 being "seat cost" heavy. It is a MANAGEMENT decision to fly them at 99 seats and not the 120 it was designed to do.
100% correct just as it was a MANAGEMENT decision to park them and outsource to RAH to save their own jobs from BK court and liquidation.

Is the rumor about Midwest not lasting the summer or the next fuel price bump true? Liquidate Midwest. That'll fix the RAH lowlifes, won't it?
Old 05-25-2009 | 09:17 AM
  #289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: E-170 Airbender
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Wheeler
100% correct just as it was a MANAGEMENT decision to park them and outsource to RAH to save their own jobs from BK court and liquidation.



Is the rumor about Midwest not lasting the summer or the next fuel price bump true? Liquidate Midwest. That'll fix the RAH lowlifes, won't it?
doesnt matter Jake what u say to 320. He will still be our pal

Last edited by RAHPilot5; 05-25-2009 at 09:36 AM.
Old 05-25-2009 | 11:13 AM
  #290  
320ToBearz's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Wheeler
100% correct just as it was a MANAGEMENT decision to park them and outsource to RAH to save their own jobs from BK court and liquidation.

Is the rumor about Midwest not lasting the summer or the next fuel price bump true? Liquidate Midwest. That'll fix the RAH lowlifes, won't it?
Learn the history and facts please. Midwest did NOT park the 717's. Stupid Hoeks-a-bucks, following his henchmen Seabury's advice, tried to low ball Boeing for even cheaper lease rates and Boeing simply said "OK, we'll take out airplanes back then." RAH was the B plan.

I have no clue to your second question as Midwest is a private company and thus numbers can be EASILY manipulated on the FAA's outmoded financial disclosure system. The small company cannot easily sustain the loses that it publicly disclosed though. And yes, I would rather see the company fail, then Republic succeed in flying the 190's. If they buy us and shut us out of our jobs, then I am glad I am out of the industry and should tell you where you truly are in their eyes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RAHPilot5
Regional
15
05-21-2009 02:04 PM
flynavyj
Regional
197
04-16-2009 05:30 AM
rickkane
Compass Airlines
143
12-04-2008 01:19 PM
pprada1
Regional
19
09-06-2008 05:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices