Midwest is to be owned by RAH.
#53
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
I had a nice long response written, but then I thought better of it for both my reputation on this board and my overall sanity.
But in a nutshell - my eyes are open Saab; having an outsider's perspective provides clarity and objectivity. The real question is are your eyes open?
Would you rather have bleeding airlines continue to bleed to the point of death, or would you rather have those airlines bought (even by a company you've loathed since they "took your flying") and allowed to continue surviving, providing gainful employment to those pilots (your professional colleagues & union brothers) who can work with and strengthen the current RAH pilot group to get a new CBA with compensation and work rules worthy of all involved parties?
And believe me, I'm not preaching.
But in a nutshell - my eyes are open Saab; having an outsider's perspective provides clarity and objectivity. The real question is are your eyes open?
Would you rather have bleeding airlines continue to bleed to the point of death, or would you rather have those airlines bought (even by a company you've loathed since they "took your flying") and allowed to continue surviving, providing gainful employment to those pilots (your professional colleagues & union brothers) who can work with and strengthen the current RAH pilot group to get a new CBA with compensation and work rules worthy of all involved parties?
And believe me, I'm not preaching.
Oh, please, the queston is wether or not Fronteir or Midwest will be a place thats worth having around anyway............."gainful employment", I am sure thats what F9, and Midwest gusy are thinking right now. I don't LOATHE anyone for "TAKING CAL'S FLYING"...............
#55
There's no choice. Any new aircraft introduced to RAH will have to have new wages negotiated for. If wages can't be negotiated then the aircraft are not flown. There's no reason that the RAH pilot group would vote for ANY pay concessions. We are a money making machine. At worst the aircraft would be operated at their current established rates.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
There's no choice. Any new aircraft introduced to RAH will have to have new wages negotiated for. If wages can't be negotiated then the aircraft are not flown. There's no reason that the RAH pilot group would vote for ANY pay concessions. We are a money making machine. [B]At worst the aircraft would be operated at their current established rates.
#57
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
There's no choice. Any new aircraft introduced to RAH will have to have new wages negotiated for. If wages can't be negotiated then the aircraft are not flown. There's no reason that the RAH pilot group would vote for ANY pay concessions. We are a money making machine. At worst the aircraft would be operated at their current established rates.
#58
RAH pilots know they are underpaid (FOs especially). They know their contract is weak in many areas. They also know their growth has pretty much stopped, and they'll likely start contracting even after this M&A activity. Additionally, RAH pilots have known many folks in the airline business don't like them (mostly regional pilots), but with the info from the last two days they've now they've got a gazillion-watt spotlight shining on them, with everybody in the industry watching.
Many pilots (especially the FOs!) at RAH know the growth and fast upgrades are over. They know Bedford wants out of the 50 seat business; they've known it for some time. They also know with each 70+ seat airplane flown by them is one fewer airplane providing jobs at a major airline.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there are some tools over there that are jumping for joy and salivating about flying an Airbus, and probably an idiot or two there screaming "staple" like a drunken idiot.
But this time, unlike 2003, RAH pilots have all the leverage in the world - the ability to destroy shareholder value in RAH, the one thing Bedford seems to worship as much as God. And they'll have a bunch of ****ed-off Midwest and Frontier pilots, if willing, to help them exercise that leverage for all its worth.
Yes, I have faith that RAH pilots will get a fair wage for the E190 airframe, and that there won't be pilots flying Airbusses around lower than the current F9 rates. Will the E190 wage match current book MEH or Jetblue? I don't know...but there is no reason whatsoever to not get rates in line with their narrowbody peers for the larger airframes (and a corresponding raise down the line).
For better or worse, many current RAH pilots will end their airline careers at RAH pilots...and I think more know that than are willing to admit it. As such, they've no reason whatsoever to accept anything less than a fair CBA.
#59
I had a nice long response written, but then I thought better of it for both my reputation on this board and my overall sanity.
But in a nutshell - my eyes are open Saab; having an outsider's perspective provides clarity and objectivity. The real question is are your eyes open?
Would you rather have bleeding airlines continue to bleed to the point of death, or would you rather have those airlines bought (even by a company you've loathed since they "took your flying") and allowed to continue surviving, providing gainful employment to those pilots (your professional colleagues & union brothers) who can work with and strengthen the current RAH pilot group to get a new CBA with compensation and work rules worthy of all involved parties?
And believe me, I'm not preaching.
But in a nutshell - my eyes are open Saab; having an outsider's perspective provides clarity and objectivity. The real question is are your eyes open?
Would you rather have bleeding airlines continue to bleed to the point of death, or would you rather have those airlines bought (even by a company you've loathed since they "took your flying") and allowed to continue surviving, providing gainful employment to those pilots (your professional colleagues & union brothers) who can work with and strengthen the current RAH pilot group to get a new CBA with compensation and work rules worthy of all involved parties?
And believe me, I'm not preaching.
I am disgusted by the mainline MECs who through their arrogance and shortsightedness allowed these deals to be codified and mainline money spent to allow these deals to occur. This is like a cancer that is spreading from the limbs to the organs now. It will be only to short before this "opportunity" comes knocking at a mainline door near you. UAL, LCC, DAL, AMR, CAL, the question is who is next?????
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: A318/319 pic
As a Frontier pilot I am curious what Republic pilots’ would consider a fair integration. I realize this is a loaded question, but I would love to here what others consider fair. As an Airbus Captain I would like to retain my seat, my aircraft, my base, and my pay. Is that acceptable to those of you at Republic?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




