Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

YX E190 picturegrafoto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2009, 05:49 AM
  #61  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,553
Default

Originally Posted by Dougdrvr View Post
Comfortable is a relative thing. When I deadhead on these things and watch the expessions on the faces of the passengers, you can just tell they are not happy when they struggle to find carryon baggage space. If BB thinks he is going to compete to the west coast from MKE against Southwest and Air Tran ,even with the 190 he got another think coming.
I used to jumpseat A LOT on Republic's E170/175 airframes and I can't say overhead baggage space was any more an issue with a full plane than on a 737, DC-9, or similar airframe.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 05:58 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
I used to jumpseat A LOT on Republic's E170/175 airframes and I can't say overhead baggage space was any more an issue with a full plane than on a 737, DC-9, or similar airframe.
Like I said, it's a relative thing. A product of what you've come to expect from previous experience. For a first time flyer, it's no big deal.What do they know? For someone who has been used to Midwest Airlines over the last 25 years, it's a letdown.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 07:57 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
I used to jumpseat A LOT on Republic's E170/175 airframes and I can't say overhead baggage space was any more an issue with a full plane than on a 737, DC-9, or similar airframe.
You must not of paid attention then. I flew and commuted on 717's for years and have been using 170's for commute for about a year. I can remember only 1 time where a 717 ran out of overhead space but it's a common occurrence on the 170.
likeitis is online now  
Old 07-15-2009, 08:04 AM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773 View Post
Sounds like a robot typed this, phone or not..don't put someone down as ignorant and "(un) informed" and claim to be an "educated business man" if you can't even write coherent, complete sentences.

"Failing company" or not, anyone that can't see that this is a negative thing for the industry needs a serious wake-up call.
First of all I apologized for not proof reading. It is near impossible on an iPhone through this forum. Second it is a forum. This isn't something I am submitting or releasing.

I find it funny that is all you can really say about the post.

As for being good for the industry. I feel it is better than the alternative. Days of regulation are over. Living like it is still regulated is over. Just look airlines are flunking. They are not capable of running efficent and profitable. The real issue is not being able to adjust ticketing prices with the the rise and low of fixed cost. It takes weeks to accomplish when it should take minutes. Airlies seem ok with losing money.

No let say southwest comes in an outbids and gets approval to purchase Frontier. Do you think they want to run the airline seperate or merge. Not a chance. Competition is needed.

I am tried of how someone is trying to get to the legacy or major carriers. Well those ideas andrntalities are one reason the regional airline is the way it
is. The truth behind is those days are over. Places are seeing guys stayin put. I think QOL and not shiny new jet or big jet or banging a light attendant in Dublin. QOL.

Leave it to RAH. We will vote only an acceptable contract. That is all the power we have. Until you see it. Shut the **** up. We are living to our current CBA. You and your cronie that compain and call us a disease. Feel free to email those concerns to RAH and you can do that via rjet.com.

As for now I am sure there is more errors so if that is all you have to day dot waste your time. You aren't putting me down except maybe to the Expressjet guys
AbZorbFly is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 08:04 AM
  #65  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,553
Default

Originally Posted by likeitis View Post
You must not of paid attention then. I flew and commuted on 717's for years and have been using 170's for commute for about a year. I can remember only 1 time where a 717 ran out of overhead space but it's a common occurrence on the 170.
Of course an airplane designed for ~110 seats but only with 80-90 would have more overhead space per passenger than an airplane designed for 72 seats with 72 seats installed.

Like I said, the 170/175, in my two years of riding on them to and from work, didn't have any more overhead storage issues than a 737 or DC-9 series airplane (US Airways, United, Northwest, Delta, etc).

Obviously, others' experiences my vary...
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 08:08 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Of course an airplane designed for ~110 seats but only with 80-90 would have more overhead space per passenger than an airplane designed for 72 seats with 72 seats installed.

Like I said, the 170/175, in my two years of riding on them to and from work, didn't have any more overhead storage issues than a 737 or DC-9 series airplane (US Airways, United, Northwest, Delta, etc).

Obviously, others' experiences my vary...
Most of my commuting was on airtran with 117 seats.
likeitis is online now  
Old 07-15-2009, 12:30 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 48
Default

I just want to know if we are going to hear any objections from Republic pilots flying the E-190 with the word Midwest on the side. I think the Midwest pilots deserve your respect. After all, you are taking their jobs. Look out F9. You are next.
Edwin is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 04:07 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by mking84 View Post
DEFEND THEM?!?!?!?! They are not defendable. They have not once stood up for themselves......but then again they would have to believe passionately about something to do so.

Bottom line is the RAH croanies are happy about this. You dont hear them talking about furloughs or downgrades do you? But you know what those who take shortcuts in life always end up getting theirs.

COME ON SWA!!!! Sit back and watch SW dismantle RAH and with any luck the RAH clan can feel some of the pain they have inflicted on worthy Midwest families.
You are an idiot but you are in good company here at APC.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 04:11 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PILOTGUY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 522
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast View Post
Wrong. They would still have 9 planes. Boeing was taking back the 717's at a rate that satisfies the new Mexican customer. RAH's involvement had nothing to do with the loss of the 717, and has nothing to do with the rate of loss. Midwest contracted with RAH once they learned of Boeing's intention to take back the 717. RAH essentially filled in the gaps in the Midwest fleet, and is going to continue to do so.
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
PILOTGUY is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 05:25 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY View Post
Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Has nothing to do with sleeping at night. Do yourself a favor and do a little research before you open your mouth and spew your garbage.

Joker
JeremiahWeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xjtr
Major
43
06-28-2009 06:51 AM
alvrb211
Regional
77
05-25-2009 09:35 AM
powrful1
Major
76
12-13-2008 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices