Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Buffalo crash pilots discussed sickness, low >

Buffalo crash pilots discussed sickness, low

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Buffalo crash pilots discussed sickness, low

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2009, 10:18 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
The main issue with 3407 is not fatigue, it is the fact that Marvin was not ready to be a 121 CA of that plane. diferently
What do you mean? Marvin said he was ready. The company said he was ready. The FAA said he was ready. Usually people that should not be flying don't make it past an airline check ride or even the training. If he managed to pass CA training, he was ready. You are saying he became a CA for the money with little thought about his responsibilities, I sincerely doubt that.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:30 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post

Colgan had a union at the time of the crash so I do not want to hear any of the "fear of retribution" stuff.

lets not think that 3407 was anything other than two people not paying attention.
cruise beat me to it, but yeah. apparently the union cant do anything for us until we have a grievance policy set up. how do you think the company's been able to fire/suspend all those dozens of guys in the recent months? if your captain doesnt like you and decides to call up the chief pilot about it, and he fires you, there is nothing that alpa can do for you.
i called in sick a month after the crash, they STILL pulled that crap where they transfer you over to the chief pilot, and asked me for a doc's note within 24 hrs.

i agree with you, when it comes down to it, they were two people who screwed up. but at the same time, it just isn't BLACK AND WHITE. yes, if they had performed the simple act of looking at the airspeed indicator this would've never happened. it is as simple as that. yet, none of us are robots. things happen, which affect us, cause us to be distracted and make mistakes/poor decisions that ultimately become accidents. if you dont even examine every link in the chain of events, how would you prevent the same accident from happening again?
obviously in our jobs we should never be complacent, but as long as we're human beings and not robots, it's never going to be as simple as being told, "just dont be complacent."

I think Rebecca was actually pretty mild in their taxi conversation.. if they were to go anyway, I wish they would've talked in more detail all the shenanigans we have to deal with and the shady perps in mgmt.
kalyx522 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 06:45 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Jetstream 823JS's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by kalyx522 View Post
at the same time, it just isn't BLACK AND WHITE. yes, if they had performed the simple act of looking at the airspeed indicator this would've never happened. it is as simple as that. yet, none of us are robots. things happen, which affect us, cause us to be distracted and make mistakes/poor decisions that ultimately become accidents.
Yes, they screwed up, because they were fatigued and sick. Though why they were tired may very well have been their own fault.

I believe there are no limits to the stupid mistakes that the human animal can make when fatigued.

I'll take an intoxicated pilot over a fatigued pilot any day of the week.
Jetstream 823JS is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:18 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brewpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Homebased
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
A Captain who was not ready to be a Captain and an FO who was not ready to be an FO caused this crash.

If you are sick, you dont work. Colgan had a union at the time of the crash so I do not want to hear any of the "fear of retribution" stuff.

This was the first leg of the first day of trip so I do not see how duty or rest requirements have anything to do with 3407.

Marvin and Becca were simply complacent and not paying attention. As much as I think we need duty and fatigue issues addressed, lets not think that 3407 was anything other than two people not paying attention.
You have no idea, I know what it is like to be afraid of calling in sick. I have already had stuff happen to me with that.
brewpilot is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:55 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie View Post
What do you mean? Marvin said he was ready. The company said he was ready. The FAA said he was ready. Usually people that should not be flying don't make it past an airline check ride or even the training. If he managed to pass CA training, he was ready. You are saying he became a CA for the money with little thought about his responsibilities, I sincerely doubt that.
Please...meeting the minimums doesn't mean you're fully ready for the responsibility. You should know better than that. Aren't you the same guy who complained about hand-flying on your dead-heads? The minimums don't say much about those skills, yet you attacked THEM. What's up?
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:08 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
A Captain who was not ready to be a Captain and an FO who was not ready to be an FO caused this crash.

If you are sick, you dont work. Colgan had a union at the time of the crash so I do not want to hear any of the "fear of retribution" stuff.

This was the first leg of the first day of trip so I do not see how duty or rest requirements have anything to do with 3407.

Marvin and Becca were simply complacent and not paying attention. As much as I think we need duty and fatigue issues addressed, lets not think that 3407 was anything other than two people not paying attention.
This is 100% correct...

The Capt was never tasked with being a real PIC at the basic levels. For example no real amount of VFR 91 Single pilot PIC such as traffic watch, no CFIing for a significant amount of time, and no 135 single pilot IFR.

And then he is all of a sudden expected to be a PIC because he has been babysat by a PIC for 2 years??? You cant emulate PIC leadership just by sitting next to someone else doing it. You have to get experience that should take place at much lower levels rather than the very first PIC responsibility on a 75 seat aircraft. If he would have been an experienced CFI I am 95% sure this would have never happened...How many times as a CFI do you tell your students to stop getting low and slow on final?

If he would have been a 135 single pilot IFR pilot I am 99.999999% sure this would have never happened.

But seniority is what it's all about and prior experience means nothing at the airlines...hopefully there wont be more crashes due to inexperience crews, but I fear that this will not be the last.

The FO was just irresponsible with her rest and commute practices. But being sick...I have flown sick and tired and let me tell you...I have never come close to letting the plane get sooo slow that it is about to stall, and more attention is paid when the flaps are going down.

When I watched the computer simlulator based on the black box data...this crash was pathetic and devastatingly obvious that people need to focus on getting more PIC experience before going to the airlines.
CaptainTeezy is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:12 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy View Post
This is 100% correct...

The Capt was never tasked with being a real PIC at the basic levels. For example no real amount of VFR 91 Single pilot PIC such as traffic watch, no CFIing for a significant amount of time, and no 135 single pilot IFR. And then he is all of a sudden expected to be a PIC because he has been babysat by a PIC for 2 years??? You cant emulate PIC leadership just by sitting next to someone else doing it. You have to get experience that should take place at much lower levels rather than on a 75 seat aircraft.
Yet the regionals are full of these types. We can Monday morning quarterback all day, but folks fitting Renslow's qualifications fill lefts seats all over the United States (and World) and seem to get the job done in the VAST majority of cases.

I am not looking to debate the mertis of experience. However from a scientific viewpoint, we seek to determine the one variable that can bring about the result, all others held constant. Lack of experience doesn't invariably lead to this result everytime. Therefore, it must be the wrong "why".

Even seasoned doctors mess up surgeries from time to time. How do you ensure 100% perfect results everytime? Is this possible within reasonable means? You can smash everyone down with more and more rules and regulations to try to solve a problem that occurs one in a million (I'd say even less) instances. But is the industry better or worse off after such implementations?

Last edited by bryris; 07-28-2009 at 06:23 PM.
bryris is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:17 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Originally Posted by bryris View Post
Yet the regionals are full of these types. We can Monday morning quarterback all day, but folks fitting Renslow's qualifications fill lefts seats all over the United States (and World) and seem to get the job done in the VAST majority of cases.
Absolutely, but that is a direct result of the incredibly safe air transport SYSTEM that literally spoon-feeds us everything, making it next to impossible to kill ourselves. Try PIC Part 91 and you'll see it is a whole different animal...
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:19 AM
  #29  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by bryris View Post
Yet the regionals are full of these types. We can Monday morning quarterback all day, but folks fitting Renslow's qualifications fill lefts seats all over the United States (and World) and seem to get the job done in the VAST majority of cases.
In our job getting the job done in the "vast majority" is failing, wouldn't you agree?
The Juice is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:21 AM
  #30  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by brewpilot View Post
You have no idea, I know what it is like to be afraid of calling in sick. I have already had stuff happen to me with that.
I have never had any issues calling in sick at Colgan, personally.

What kind of stuff has happened to you with calling in sick?
The Juice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DryMotorBoatin
Regional
22
07-06-2009 06:21 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
18
06-12-2009 04:47 AM
Redwood
Major
73
09-06-2008 06:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices