Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Some numbers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2009 | 08:43 AM
  #41  
flynwmn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default

thats what it is at Piedmont everyone needs a first class, but with the first class being good for a year until you're 40 now its pretty much a mute point.
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 12:38 PM
  #42  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Thumbs up Widget Wishes

Originally Posted by johnso29
Tom,

It still works this way at DAL. I'm a Diesel 9 FO, and I get a new 1st Class every 12 months.

PS-I hope you're enjoying retirement. It must be nice to look at all this junk knowing it no longer effects you.
johnso29,

Thanks. Like most retirees, I miss the flying but not the other stuff (like commuting). If possible, a pilot should determine when the job will no longer be enjoyable and retire one week before that date.

You guys will do just fine. The merger seems to be working better than anyone hoped, and you hold what I considered the second-most-fun seat on the airline, (next to DC-9 CA).
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 01:04 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by WEACLRS
I ran total numbers and came up with the following: Total pilots in the FAA database with a certificate (Student, Recreational, Sport, Private, Commercial, or ATP), using the USA as a "country" (the database does include foreign pilots with an FAA certificate and I did remove them from the pool), and disregarding medical expiration date I returned 526,506 certificates. When I selected just ATPs in the USA without regard to medical I returned 111,746. CMEL with an instrument rating (no ATP) without regard to medical, I returned 72,513. The combined of the two is 184,259.

You can search with a limitation on the medical expiration. I choose limit the pool to those with medicals initially issued as first class that expired or will expire in 2009 and 2010. The number of ATPs is 76,257. The number of CMELs with an instrument rating but no ATP is 18,054. The total of the two is 94,311. That number at the end of 2007 based on my search with the same methodology then was approximately 104,000. If you add in the pilots that meet the above with a medical that expired in 2008 you would add 9906.

Here is a link to the FAA database through Landings.com which has a fairly good search engine:
Landings: Aviation's Databases

I used APC data for the current number of employed pilots. It didn't take that long to add them up.

While the actual numbers are interesting and debatable, using the same methodology in Jan 2008 and now I come up with about the same number of "available" pilots in the pool.
Include the people with valid second class medicals and you will have a better picture. Several airlines that I have personal knowledge of do not require FO's to keep first class medicals, they get hired with a first, but only need renew 2nd class. You are missing a bunch of pilots in your "study."
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 01:06 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by DBSociety
The Dec 31st 2008 FAA database shows 613.746 total certs (student-ATP) and 271,584 hold either a COMM or ATP. Theres really no way to tell who went for a new medical on Jan 1st, who flies New York to Milan and who got out of the game and sells used cars.
Exactly the point I'm trying to get him to admitt to...
the study is flawed. Nice info, and I would absolutely agree that there are less pilots now than before.... but not to the extreme he is purporting in the study.
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 01:10 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
This may be how it is at AE, but not everywhere. When I was at ExpressJet we had to get a 1st Class Medical EVERY year. We were allowed to let it go past 6 months, HOWEVER when we went to get our medical renewed it was required to be renewed as a 1st Class Medical. We were never allowed to just get a 2nd Class. This is how it works at DAL/NWA as well.

BTW, when your 1st class medical hits 6 months it is STILL a 1st class medical. It does NOT become a 2nd class medical, you are just not allowed to excercise the privileges of that 1st class medical past 6 months.
I'm not Eagle; do they do it that way too? I hold a first class, so I'm one of the folks in his "study." as are most of the folks here I'm sure.
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 08:31 PM
  #46  
250 or point 65's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Default

2 things:

First, Mason, why do you keep putting "study" in quotes? The OP doesn't work for CNN or FOX and did not seem to have some sort of agenda behind posting his findings. He strictly put out some numbers and unlike CNN and FOX explained exactly how he got the numbers. We all understand that you believe there's roughly eleventy billion FO's out there 121, flying around with an expired 3rd class medical, but let it go...based on most company rules, his numbers are relatively accurate.

Second, why would any foreigner, EVER, since deregulation want to come to the US to fly for an airline here? I'm sure most of us have heard what they make overseas, the shortages they have in pilots and seen the FA's walking behind them in the B terminal at IAD. There's no way we're going to get a flood of international FO's IF we have a shortage.
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 09:18 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
But aren't those students destined for China's own exploding aviation industry, trained in the US because (among other reasons) China simply doesn't have the required GA infrastructure to handle that volume?

Yes they are. The point I was making is that depending on where the author got his information from, the number of students obtaining a commercial pilots certificate could be skewed due to the large number of foreign students obtaining commercial pilot certificates here, and then leaving to go back home. Essentially, yes there were 5000 commercial license issued last year, but who were they issued to, and are they a viable segment of the working pilot group here in the U.S.? The FAA data simply states that one was issued, not were the applicant came from. It would be interesting to see how many American citizens got their commercial pilots license from 2008 that were actively seeking employment here in the US.

As for a pilot shortage, it would depend on a few things:

1. The state of the economy on a macro level
2. The amount of available training
3. The practicality for students to receive that training
4. The ability to finance said training
5. Upcoming legislative issues (y'all know what I'm talking about)
6. The requirement for airlines to hire due to expansion and not simply attrition

I'd say with relative confidence that Items 2-5 are very real factors. Items 1 and 6 are possible but unlikely since regionals are becoming the new nationals and are being force to hold their own more and more. There just aren't that many flight schools out there these days. Quite frankly if it weren't for foreign students then the skies would be ALOT quieter. Interesting item to note is that the Chinese are actively seeking flight school owners to develop, build and manage flight schools in China. I'd say in about 5-10 years, once China does develop its infrastructure, there will only be about 10-15 large flight schools left in this country. Flying has become far too expensive for a flight school to remain open just teaching pleasure and business pilots. There have been several flight schools that have closed down here in Addison over the past 2 years alone. Flight schools will have to adjust to train the zero to hero professional student pilots, or eventually have to close their doors. It won't happen overnight but one day well all wake up and say wonder when was the last time we saw a Cessna fly overhead. It would be sadly ironic if in 20-50 years we were sending OUR future pilots to China for thier training!
Reply
Old 09-22-2009 | 11:09 AM
  #48  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

I'm sorry this post may get a little long. I want to address some of the questions raised in this thread.

Mason, I respect your challenges. However, I'm sorry, I still don't agree with you. I will attempt to explain why in a moment.

The FAA pilot database is really a database of certificates. There are many more certificates in the database than just pilots. There are a total of 1,004,229 certificates in the database today. Only 645,301 of them are pilot certificates (student, sport, recreational, private, commercial, and ATP). For example there are 288,486 A&P certificates (some of which also hold pilot certificates), 32,433 Control Tower Operator certificates, 17,016 Dispatchers, and even 6,642 Parachute Rigger certificates.

The database also contains many pilots with foreign addresses, ie foreign pilots. Yes you can search by them and break them out. For example there are 85,461 “European” pilots, which include pilots from not only continental Europe, but also countries like India (5,813) or Pakistan (116) or Kuwait (57). There are pilots from China (1908), Korea (812), Japan (3759), and Mexico (2493). Their addresses are the addresses they used when they obtained their medical certificates or updated their address with the FAA. If they used a foreign address, I excluded them from the numbers I pulled. If they used a USA address, then they would be included.

Data can be pulled by certificate type and class level medical expiration. For example, there were 1566 student pilot certificates with USA addresses with 1st class medical expiration dates in 2010 and 3519 student pilot certificates with USA addresses with 1st class medical expiration dates in 2009, for a total of 5085. I suspect strongly this group are the recent new pilot starts that fancy themselves someday being a professional pilot. That total is also down by more than half, consistent with what we see in the flight school training industry today. Again history has shown that less than 10% complete the required certificates and ratings.

The certificate database is also about three to four months behind in updates. So the numbers pulled today really represent the picture in May or June of this year. The numbers I pulled in January 2008 really represent the picture in August or so of 2007.

Mason, the reasons I don't agree with your point-of-view are I believe most airline pilots keep and hold a first class medical. They may only get it once a year as an FO, but they still get first class's. I think in most cases their company requires it, because the company wants to make sure they stay captain ready. I'm sure all major's require it, and based on the posts here, I think most regionals require it. If you fly international, even to Mexico or Canada, I know ICAO regulations require it.

You think there are a lot of regional airline FO's that don't obtain new first class medicals once a year, but get second classes, and therefor I have missed them in my count. By the data listed in APC, there are 21,009 pilots I have listed as regional, and yes I include the regional “majors” in that list. 90% of those pilots work for American Eagle, SkyWest, ExpressJet, Republic, ASA, Mesa, Pinnacle, Comair, Mesaba, Air Wisconsin, Horizon, PSA, Peidmont, and Colgan. Based on the responses in this thread I think it's safe to say most require the 1st class. That leaves 2095 pilots that work for the rest (Lynx, Great Lakes, Cape Air, etc.). Roughly half of those pilots would be FO's. That amounts to 1047 or so pilots. And I still suspect most of those get 1st class medicals at least once a year.

The second reason is more important. While the total pilot pool numbers are interesting and to a certain extent debatable, I did not include CMEL's with an instrument rating and a 2nd class physical in the January 2008 data. I want to compare “apples to apples” because I am most interested in the change, the delta, that may have taken place in the last two years of essentially no hiring, than the exact total number.

I define a pilot shortage as management having to spend money and change their hiring practices because they find themselves unable to fill their classes. In 2007 and early 2008 we certainly had strong signs of that condition at the regional hiring level. Recruiting Reps at many airlines were crisscrossing the country (spending money) establishing “preferential hiring” relationships with flight schools. Management was offering bonuses and bounties (spending money), increasing pay rates and training salaries (spending money), and putting in two to six week pre-hire courses (I was personally involved with one at a smaller regional that had a $500,000 annual budget). Minimum hiring experience in some cases was at commercial mins. In some cases regional management was going to their major airline partners and asking them to stop hiring their pilots – they were struggling to meet their contracts for departures. Managements were going to their pilot unions and negotiating side letters to let them promote out of seniority order because they were running out of captains that met insurance mins. Management wasn't doing those things out of the kindness of their heart.

So when I look at the pilot data from January 2008 which reflects a time when the above shortages were occurring and I look again at the pilot data today, I don't see an appreciable difference. In fact the argument can be made that there are potentially even less pilots available. There is no growth in the pool of certificate qualified pilots, no large group appears to be in training (new starts are down almost 60%), flight schools are failing or turning to foreign training contracts to survive, the major financiers of flight training (Key Bank and Wells Fargo) are no longer in the business, and the cost of obtaining the necessary certificates, ratings, and experience ($35,000 to $80,000 and continuing to climb) is still a very strong barrier for most to cross without help. It appears the conditions which lead to a shortage pilots at the regional level still exist. The certificate database reflects this.

A poster stated I had no agenda. I appreciate the comment, but I do have a small one. I want people to understand the number of pilots we are taking about. The entire group of active and available airline pilots wouldn't fill Jerry's new dome in Arlington, TX. We would have elbow room. 90% of the available pool is employed and working. They may not be in the job they want forever, but they are pulling in a paycheck. We are the supply side of the supply and demand equation. It's important that we understand the size of the supply if we are to negotiate effectively with management. We have to understand that the “supply”, us, is smaller, getting smaller, and not being replenished. Many posters on this site talk about “taking back the profession”. We may have a time rapidly approaching when airlines are looking to hire relatively large amounts of qualified pilots again. Understanding this data will make us tougher and more able to negotiate significant improvements at our airlines. It is an opportunity we haven't seen in a while.

Will we be ready to take it?

Last edited by WEACLRS; 09-22-2009 at 11:36 AM.
Reply
Old 09-22-2009 | 11:26 AM
  #49  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Whether your numbers are materially correct or not, I for one, appreciate the time and effort you've put in and the spirit from which you are coming from.

I tend to be pessimistic when it comes to a flying career. All I have ever seen in my nearly 11 years of flying is more pilots than positions - that ranges from everything from right seat in King Air just for free to build time (someone else is doing it) to flight instructing (we don't need anybody right now) to airlines (furloughed half the pilot group). But, the truth is the truth. If this approximates it at all, it sounds good.

Good news is a rarity during these times.
Reply
Old 09-22-2009 | 01:40 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

To the OP, I really found your post interesting and I appreciate the hard work you put into it. If I'm reading your numbers correctly, there really is a looming pilot shortage in the offing. While there is a large group waiting for recalls, there is not a large group waiting for new hire positions.

I instruct at my local airport (KLOU) and I can add just from my own experience there has been almost no student pilot training taking place over the last 18 months. I have worked with several students who have added an instrument rating or done BFR's, but there is very little new training taking place.

Having said that, I have noticed a bit more general activity in the last few months. While I don't believe the economy is in a "V" shaped recovery, many analysts do believe that. If that's the case and it continues into 2010, it's possible we could be right back where we were in 2007.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
themotleyfool
Major
21
04-29-2012 03:58 PM
grant123
Major
2
01-27-2009 07:42 AM
jungle
Money Talk
13
01-19-2009 06:06 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-30-2008 10:22 AM
Squirt
Military
52
11-25-2008 03:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices