Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ANPRM: New 121 Pilot Certification Rqmts. >

ANPRM: New 121 Pilot Certification Rqmts.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ANPRM: New 121 Pilot Certification Rqmts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2010 | 05:39 AM
  #51  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

9. The amount of unemployed pilots in the US today would just cover the need for one year of hiring at peak levels with top retirement numbers like in 3 years from now. The year after that the aviation colleges would only be able to supply 15 to 20% of the demand.<quote>.

Another Nonsense. Majors and regionals are shrinking. Regionals are shrinking faster than you can say nuts. I say again for those hard of hearing, There is no shortage of qualified pilots in the US. There are plenty of well qualified pilots, from furloughed and working regional pilots, corporate pilots, freight pilots, and military pilots waiting for better opportunities to show up in the next couple of years. The reason why so many regionals hired so many 350 hour wonders in 2008 time frame is because very few ATP rated pilots could afford to fly for $23/hour at a regional when you can make more doing just about anything else.

Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 06:18 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Wrong
Default

First, I'll admit I am someone that is low time, trying to come up the ranks and pay my dues but I see part of this proposal as a disaster.

I agree that more training always improves safety. But the 1,500 hour ATP minimums I disagree with. This is why: When Joe Pilot finishes his commercial single and multi training he could anywhere from 250 hours on up. So when he goes hunting for a job, 250 hours isn't enough. What's Joe Pilot going to do? Find the cheapest (lets admit it, we are all broke) way to gain the hours needed to meet the current hiring minimums to stay competitive. Joe Pilot is going to go a couple different ways to accomplish this. A) Earn a CFI/CFII/MEI rating and instruct until he is satisfied with his hours. During this he could be giving quality instruction or just be a yoke holder to log time. B) Buy time the cheapest way possible, either in C152's, J3 Cubs or a multi time building program. C) Fly banners, sky divers and other low time pilot positions, whenever insurance allows him to come on board. Or D) Military flight officer.

So out of those options which one most like 121 flying? A? Not in my mind. How does 2,000 hours in the pattern flying a 152, 172, Seminole, Dutchess transfer into flying a CRJ, ScareBus or Boeing? I don't see it. C? From I have read here and heard from other sources, banner towing and skydiving is still legal time, but not always accepted. D) I was enlisted, served my time and left with an honorable discharge and the GI Bill. Therefore I don't have first hand experience with the selection process, commissioning, and the going through flight school... So I couldn't fly, but as the saying goes "My parents couldn't afford to put me through college, but Uncle Sam can." Here I am, earned my ratings and going down path A. In my mind B is the closest to it. If you buy into a 'academy' type school. Isn't the the goal here, to "train like you fight" for that 121 dream job?

I agree with higher education, experience and ratings should be rewarded with better compensation. But if everyone should have an ATP before interviewing, how does that new standard become any better than the current? What's to say a first year FO with an ATP doesn't get paid minimum wage?
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 06:28 AM
  #53  
TMoney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: 717 Sidekick
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Feds set the rules. Feds don't set the pay. The market does. If there is still a mountain-stack of resumes on Colgan's desk there is no need to raise the pay.
You hit the nail on the head with that one!
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 10:32 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
College degree is required for all professional jobs so why shouldn't it be required for Professional airline pilot jobs? Major airlines require it and Congress wants to make the hiring requirements for regionals equal to majors. So yeah, I think college degree should be required. BTW, military requires it too, if you want to be a pilot. A college degree does not have to an aviation degree.
The college degrees required for other professional, licensed jobs are professional degrees in their field. Lawyers need law degrees. Doctors need medical degrees. Engineers need engineering degrees. I'm unaware of any profession that requires a degree unrelated to the career field. If pilots are to be considered professionals in that way, a degree in political science, psychology, biology, or engineering (in which I have my degree) wouldn't make sense.

Now I think an airline having a requirement for a degree for their hiring minimums makes sense. It gives some indication about the general experience and abilities of the individual and could factor into whether they want them as an employee. However, a non-related degree has little bearing on your ability to safely and effectively practice a profession.

And as was mentioned by BoilerUP, the military requires a college degree to be an comissioned officer, not to be a pilot. Even if the vast majority of pilot warrant officers have degrees, it is not a requirement.

Just to be clear I am in favor of increasing mins for all 121 pilots to an ATP certificate (and don't think a four year college degree makes sense as an ATP requirement).
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 10:58 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
Plus, why should we have to compete with aliens for few pilot positions there are in the US?
The idea that people who are legally in this country, who are legally allowed to work in this country, and are otherwise fully qualified for a job should be legally excluded from that job because you don't want as much competition when you apply for it....

I don't know that I can even respond to that in language that would be appropriate for this forum.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 11:29 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptFuzz
The idea that people who are legally in this country, who are legally allowed to work in this country, and are otherwise fully qualified for a job should be legally excluded from that job because you don't want as much competition when you apply for it....

I don't know that I can even respond to that in language that would be appropriate for this forum.
Yeah, it is not like we are a country of immigrants who have only been here for a few hundred years. What's that? We are? Oh yeah.

I've got to agree, the opinion that we are going to disallow people who are legally allowed to work her here the opportunity to work is asinine. Pure selfeshness and nothing more.

Last edited by jayray; 02-19-2010 at 11:32 AM. Reason: Spelling
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 12:22 PM
  #57  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by CaptFuzz
The idea that people who are legally in this country, who are legally allowed to work in this country, and are otherwise fully qualified for a job should be legally excluded from that job because you don't want as much competition when you apply for it....

I don't know that I can even respond to that in language that would be appropriate for this forum.
Then don't. Stop trolling airline forum and go back to your C152. Change in hiring stds are coming whether student wannabes like you want them or not.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 12:28 PM
  #58  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jayray
Yeah, it is not like we are a country of immigrants who have only been here for a few hundred years. What's that? We are? Oh yeah.

I've got to agree, the opinion that we are going to disallow people who are legally allowed to work her here the opportunity to work is asinine. Pure selfeshness and nothing more.
Selfishness you say? Try getting a flying job in Europe and then tell us how that will go without European citizenship. If they require it why shouldn't we require it in the US. We have the most liberal immigration and employment policy in the world. Either you have difficulty with your reading or just plain too lazy to read the entire post. Don't take it out of context and twist it to suit your agenda. Whatever they maybe.

Requiring citizenship for certain jobs is nothing new or a novelty. It is a fact for many jobs in the US, including the private sector.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 12:32 PM
  #59  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by CaptFuzz
The idea that people who are legally in this country, who are legally allowed to work in this country, and are otherwise fully qualified for a job should be legally excluded from that job because you don't want as much competition when you apply for it....

I don't know that I can even respond to that in language that would be appropriate for this forum.
Save the fake outrage, it's a two-way street. We use to immigrate people to this country when there was a shortage of qualified workers. Not to mention the elephant in the room...

Last edited by blastoff; 02-19-2010 at 12:51 PM.
Reply
Old 02-19-2010 | 01:29 PM
  #60  
HermannGraf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: CR7
Default yeah right....

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
9. The amount of unemployed pilots in the US today would just cover the need for one year of hiring at peak levels with top retirement numbers like in 3 years from now. The year after that the aviation colleges would only be able to supply 15 to 20% of the demand.<quote>.

Another Nonsense. Majors and regionals are shrinking. Regionals are shrinking faster than you can say nuts. I say again for those hard of hearing, There is no shortage of qualified pilots in the US. There are plenty of well qualified pilots, from furloughed and working regional pilots, corporate pilots, freight pilots, and military pilots waiting for better opportunities to show up in the next couple of years. The reason why so many regionals hired so many 350 hour wonders in 2008 time frame is because very few ATP rated pilots could afford to fly for $23/hour at a regional when you can make more doing just about anything else.
Talk about Nonsense

The only Regional shrinking are the ones owned by majors (eccept for Mesa but that is another story) or do you mean that Republic, Skywest, GoJet, Pinnacle and even Colgan are shrinking?

The amount of 350 wonders hired 2007-2008 are not many at all like you would like people to believe. 2% of the Regional pilots actually. The FAA has the numbers. Check them out. Some Regionals kept 1000 TT and 100 ME even during 2007-2008. I should know as my Regional had that. My class 2007 had only guys with an average of 3000 hours and even a couple of guys with 7000 hours TT. All of them seemed to be able to afford the $23 for the first year as they where there.

You dont know squat and are just guessing without having done any home work and then you like to call others that done it for "nonsense".

Other you are an old fart at a major with very small windows, negative attitude and think he knows it all because he says so or you are a young punk that is bitter and thinks that is everyones else fault he can not move forward fast enough in his career. What ever you are you sure sound like voices from the 1930 and 40 in Germany, trying to blaim your problems on foreigners and who knows what else.

Maybe you should learn another language than English and get more global and try your luck in other places. I had 15 years as a Commercial pilot, worked for 3 companies, many thousends hours and more than 1000 just in Turbine time before I started with my Regional (you can call me wonder if you like) and I do not have a negative attitude like you because of that. I could be complaining that I should have been at a major instead but when I hear the attitude and what comes out from some of the major pilots mouth I am glad that I am at the Regionals where most do not have other options than just be humble. All roads are not easy, all are different and one has to do the best of it. I do not blaim others if i cannot move forward. that' for sure.

We all had to start at $23. I wish we could change the pay. Heck I want to get $123 to start but that is dreaming at the moment.

If you cannot afford to take a job then look for something else or try to change what Regional pilots are being paid in an active way or maybe just maybe you should think about even adapting your way of living to the $23 an hour for the first year like most of us had to.............

Last edited by HermannGraf; 02-19-2010 at 02:19 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
b18onboost
Part 135
35
01-10-2021 03:53 PM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM
Sniper
Aviation Law
13
11-15-2009 08:16 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
normajean21
Flight Schools and Training
30
10-25-2008 09:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices