Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Plan for higher pay scales? >

Plan for higher pay scales?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Plan for higher pay scales?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2010 | 07:54 AM
  #11  
TwinTurboPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default

raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 07:59 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Baron B-55 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboPilot
raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.


Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:01 AM
  #13  
flynwmn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.
Railway Labor Act
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:03 AM
  #14  
Diver Driver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Tiki bar
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
How do you attract people to this industry when you tell them..

Set out to be a pilot spend 100k 2 years training 3 years working your butt off in little planes teaching others then get hired (if your lucky) and work for little to no money the first few years as an FO...OR go to college get a degree in architecture with your 5 years and make 200k a year out of the gate...
That's exactly the point. If the airlines cannot find enough qualified applicants that meet the 1,500 hour law, they will have to make changes in order to attract qualified applicants. Pay would be one of those changes. Pay goes up, more students may be willing to walk the path. The happy little cycle continues.

I really don't see any downside to this law passing, other than a bunch of flight school kids getting whiny about 'how hard it will be' and how they 'deserve a job right out of school'... but talking about the 'generation of entitlement' is for another discussion.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:05 AM
  #15  
Diver Driver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Tiki bar
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.
The RLA... if we could get out of that, pilots would probably have more leverage.

EDIT: Sorry flynwmn, you beat me to it!
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:14 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Baron B-55 Left Seat
Default

Hmm i just read about the RLA

It says major strikes are only allowed when all other methods of dispute have been exhausted. And you may only strike on a large scale when you are striking to resolve a major issue.

The RLA seems to have a lot of loose ends
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:15 AM
  #17  
snippercr's Avatar
Does NOT get weekends off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: ERJ - 145
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Well like so many others my concern is that what incentive to people have to put 100k into training or close to it and spend 2-5 years doing it then another 2-3 years instructing living off scraps to get to a regional that is gonna pay 19-25k for the first 2-3 years.... Its not worth it. The first thing that needs to change is the pay scale...THEN the requirements. just my opinion.
My understanding was the whole thing about the bill was to increase the SAFETY on air transport, not the pilot pay. The problem I have with the bill is look at the past major crashes by regionals... did any of them have pilots with less than 1500 hours when they crashed? Yes they got hired with less than that, but once they got 1500 hours, they could have been hired.

If we REALLY want to see pilot pay increase, I would love to see a 4 year degree in aviation, management, or aerospace e. Airlines should also look at activities outside of aviation, volunteer programs/community involvement, and college grades. These are the requirements for just about ANY PROFESSIONAL entry level job.

A garbage man or bus driver just is looked at to see if they can pass the training, then they get trained and payed 20-30k. That's all aviation is now. Can you pass the training? Good, pass it and collect your minimum wage.

However, why would any airline want to require a 4 year degree/1500 hours/volunteering? That means they WOULD have to pay more and why on gods green earth would they want THAT when they are happily paying pilot's nothing!

Disclaimer: I support the ATP rule even though I am a lowly CFI with only 500 hours. I humbly respect everyone who has gotten where they are regardless of their experience and just because our jobs may not be PERCEIVED as professional (argument above), I know everyone here IS. No flame bait, trolling or disrespect in anyway meant.

OR go to college get a degree in architecture with your 5 years and make 200k a year out of the gate...
Careful! I live with a arch grad student and if you told him the perception is archs make 200k out the door, you would have a straight edge to dig out of your skull. It's funny the misconceptions about careers. People think pilot's make 100k out the door and architects make 200k. He said (this is after 5 years of arch undergrad and grad school) in the first 3-5 years expect to make below 40k. Not until your signature goes on the designs do you make more. Hmm, sounds a like aviation, especially right seat vs left seat. I may have just disproved my entire argument above. Your post was made while I was typing the first part. Doggonit.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:36 AM
  #18  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboPilot
raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.
You're forgetting one thing.., that was back then, when paying dues meant something because something good was waiting for you at the end. No one in their right mind would chase this bus driver job now unless there is significant improvement in everything. Raising mins will only help against past company tactics of hiring SJS labor. You can't blame the low timers we all would do the same if an RJ is dangled in front of us, but we can take away the ability of companies to be able to hire them in an effort to keep wages low. There needs to be a level of respect and sense of worth that management has to feel in order for us to be taken seriously at the negotiating table.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:39 AM
  #19  
CANAM's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: 1986 LeBaron Convertable
Default

If your aircraft says Express, Connection, Link, Eagle, ect., on the side, your company will have to bid on that flying. Capitalism dictates the lowest bidder will get the contract, so your company had better be VERY competitive in today's market economy. So long as another company will underbid your company, the pay will not go up. Sorry.
Reply
Old 04-13-2010 | 08:42 AM
  #20  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by asims33
Hmm i just read about the RLA

It says major strikes are only allowed when all other methods of dispute have been exhausted. And you may only strike on a large scale when you are striking to resolve a major issue.

The RLA seems to have a lot of loose ends
The RLA is a complete disaster for us. I am surprised there hasn't been an uprising. What profession do you know of where you're paid less than what someone in the same position made 20 years ago? The RLA assures that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
brownie
Cargo
7
05-27-2009 06:50 PM
emb145captain
Money Talk
1
12-03-2008 03:13 PM
BTDT
Money Talk
11
11-15-2008 10:01 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
02-26-2005 09:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices