Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

F9/rah Sli?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2010, 04:56 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by FLEX View Post
The pilots I have encountered at RAH all seem to imply that their hands are tied. Bedford and Heller take their share of the blame as well as the Teamsters.

What is frustrating is all the talk of "just wait til we negotiate our next contract, then you'll see." I have heard RAH pilots talk about how they have fought the good fight, but I have never seen positive results.

The only conclusion I can come up with is you are waiting for the Midwest and Frontier pilots to show up and fight your fight for you. I sure hope we are treated fairly during the SLI.
Well if you don't like the integration the responsibility will fall squarely on the shoulders of the arbitrator. Based on what I have heard each pilot group's integration reps have asked for the most favorable conditions for their respective pilot group, just as they should. The final decision is in the hands of the arbitrator. At least Rat will not be able to blame that on the RAH pilots.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 05:36 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
Default

Originally Posted by TillerEnvy View Post
We're in our 3rd year of negotiations and are/will be desperately trying to get a contract that reflects the changes that BB has done with this "regional" airline.
No you aren't. When was your last negotiating session with the company? Remember your worthless union can't walk and chew bubble gum.
likeitis is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:53 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 842
Default

Originally Posted by likeitis View Post
No you aren't. When was your last negotiating session with the company? Remember your worthless union can't walk and chew bubble gum.

and your worthless union cant negotiate a scope clause
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:00 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

oh snap...
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:16 PM
  #45  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by likeitis View Post
No you aren't. When was your last negotiating session with the company? Remember your worthless union can't walk and chew bubble gum.
To be honest you are correct that negotiations ceased for a period of time. It wasn't because of inept leadership. The union did what was best for the pilot group. It might not have felt great but it was the best course of action with hindsight being 20/20.

There was a lot of progress made until a realization happened that a certain individual was abusing his position within the union for personal benefit. That has since been corrected. After his removal the best course of action then seemed to halt contract negotiations until integration was complete. Why? Because it's hard to strike or bargain when there's no single seniority list.

I understand your distaste for the situation but try and be a little more professional about it. There's not a single person on this list that has chosen to be put in this situation. New fleet types along with additional certificates and a complete change to the business structure means things need to take time to be done correctly. Don't get me wrong I wish like no other that a new contract was in place yesterday but I won't pretend I'm ignorant enough to not understand why it isn't. Things worth having take time. Slowing things down to give us more leverage going forward definitely wasn't the easy road. Knock it all you'd like but anyone that takes a moment to look at the situation will know better. Sooner or later you're going to have to realize things are better when working together rather than taking cheap shots when able.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 09:25 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by Killer51883 View Post
and your worthless union cant negotiate a scope clause
Damn...burn of the week right there!
SUX4U is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 09:34 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by SUX4U View Post
Damn...burn of the week right there!
Burn of the week?? I think everyone seems to forget to easily that those guys stood up for what was right and tried to preserve everyones careers. It still makes me sick when I'm flying and am told to follow the "Midwest" aircraft. It was the teamsters that gladly stepped in and started flying this 100 err 99 seat aircraft.

As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
F9er is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 10:06 PM
  #48  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by F9er View Post
Burn of the week?? I think everyone seems to forget to easily that those guys stood up for what was right and tried to preserve everyones careers. It still makes me sick when I'm flying and am told to follow the "Midwest" aircraft. It was the teamsters that gladly stepped in and started flying this 100 err 99 seat aircraft.

As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
Actually there's a grievance on the 99 seat aircraft. Wanting to stay separate is a death sentence. Integration needs to be completed.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:04 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
willflyforcash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Posts: 520
Default

watch out for the ole' whip sawwwww if you stay separate.
willflyforcash is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:56 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 624
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
To be honest you are correct that negotiations ceased for a period of time. It wasn't because of inept leadership. The union did what was best for the pilot group. It might not have felt great but it was the best course of action with hindsight being 20/20.

There was a lot of progress made until a realization happened that a certain individual was abusing his position within the union for personal benefit. That has since been corrected. After his removal the best course of action then seemed to halt contract negotiations until integration was complete. Why? Because it's hard to strike or bargain when there's no single seniority list.

I understand your distaste for the situation but try and be a little more professional about it. There's not a single person on this list that has chosen to be put in this situation. New fleet types along with additional certificates and a complete change to the business structure means things need to take time to be done correctly. Don't get me wrong I wish like no other that a new contract was in place yesterday but I won't pretend I'm ignorant enough to not understand why it isn't. Things worth having take time. Slowing things down to give us more leverage going forward definitely wasn't the easy road. Knock it all you'd like but anyone that takes a moment to look at the situation will know better. Sooner or later you're going to have to realize things are better when working together rather than taking cheap shots when able.
Ok, we are drifting here but this is just something that make zero sense to me.

Assume for a minute that the NMB decides we are a single carrier, and then the IBT prevails in the representation drive. We are all IBT members, and there is already an IBT CBA in place. A combined/almagamated CBA will result using the existing IBT CBA.

If the IBT had continued their Section 6 negotiations and improved ANY section of the current CBA, we would all benefit from it in the combined CBA. Instead, we are stuck with the current POS CBA.

No workrules.
No duty limits.
No retirement.
No cancellation pay.
No training or vacation conflict drop protection.
Article 7 Vacancies is such an abomination that I just can't continue to read the rest of the CBA.

Why the IBT is sitting on their arses and not negotiating is simply mindboggling. The company is actually equally surprised, and pleased, at the IBT's complete lack of planning and representation.

If this scenario plays out, will the IBT then restart the Section 6 negotiations? Congrats, you just wasted two plus years at the table. That is two additional years of working under the same workrules and pay.
zoooropa is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aloha
Regional
75
06-12-2010 06:15 PM
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM
caddis
Mergers and Acquisitions
85
12-08-2008 07:26 PM
tonyviv
Mergers and Acquisitions
18
12-04-2008 04:55 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
10-25-2008 07:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices