F9/rah Sli?
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
The pilots I have encountered at RAH all seem to imply that their hands are tied. Bedford and Heller take their share of the blame as well as the Teamsters.
What is frustrating is all the talk of "just wait til we negotiate our next contract, then you'll see." I have heard RAH pilots talk about how they have fought the good fight, but I have never seen positive results.
The only conclusion I can come up with is you are waiting for the Midwest and Frontier pilots to show up and fight your fight for you. I sure hope we are treated fairly during the SLI.
What is frustrating is all the talk of "just wait til we negotiate our next contract, then you'll see." I have heard RAH pilots talk about how they have fought the good fight, but I have never seen positive results.
The only conclusion I can come up with is you are waiting for the Midwest and Frontier pilots to show up and fight your fight for you. I sure hope we are treated fairly during the SLI.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
No you aren't. When was your last negotiating session with the company? Remember your worthless union can't walk and chew bubble gum.
#43
#45
There was a lot of progress made until a realization happened that a certain individual was abusing his position within the union for personal benefit. That has since been corrected. After his removal the best course of action then seemed to halt contract negotiations until integration was complete. Why? Because it's hard to strike or bargain when there's no single seniority list.
I understand your distaste for the situation but try and be a little more professional about it. There's not a single person on this list that has chosen to be put in this situation. New fleet types along with additional certificates and a complete change to the business structure means things need to take time to be done correctly. Don't get me wrong I wish like no other that a new contract was in place yesterday but I won't pretend I'm ignorant enough to not understand why it isn't. Things worth having take time. Slowing things down to give us more leverage going forward definitely wasn't the easy road. Knock it all you'd like but anyone that takes a moment to look at the situation will know better. Sooner or later you're going to have to realize things are better when working together rather than taking cheap shots when able.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320
Posts: 103
Burn of the week?? I think everyone seems to forget to easily that those guys stood up for what was right and tried to preserve everyones careers. It still makes me sick when I'm flying and am told to follow the "Midwest" aircraft. It was the teamsters that gladly stepped in and started flying this 100 err 99 seat aircraft.
As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
#48
Burn of the week?? I think everyone seems to forget to easily that those guys stood up for what was right and tried to preserve everyones careers. It still makes me sick when I'm flying and am told to follow the "Midwest" aircraft. It was the teamsters that gladly stepped in and started flying this 100 err 99 seat aircraft.
As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
As for the sli, I personally think it will take years before we ever see a rah pilot on the f9 cert. Let's just pray we are not single carrier status so we can preserve what's right for our f9 first officers.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 624
To be honest you are correct that negotiations ceased for a period of time. It wasn't because of inept leadership. The union did what was best for the pilot group. It might not have felt great but it was the best course of action with hindsight being 20/20.
There was a lot of progress made until a realization happened that a certain individual was abusing his position within the union for personal benefit. That has since been corrected. After his removal the best course of action then seemed to halt contract negotiations until integration was complete. Why? Because it's hard to strike or bargain when there's no single seniority list.
I understand your distaste for the situation but try and be a little more professional about it. There's not a single person on this list that has chosen to be put in this situation. New fleet types along with additional certificates and a complete change to the business structure means things need to take time to be done correctly. Don't get me wrong I wish like no other that a new contract was in place yesterday but I won't pretend I'm ignorant enough to not understand why it isn't. Things worth having take time. Slowing things down to give us more leverage going forward definitely wasn't the easy road. Knock it all you'd like but anyone that takes a moment to look at the situation will know better. Sooner or later you're going to have to realize things are better when working together rather than taking cheap shots when able.
There was a lot of progress made until a realization happened that a certain individual was abusing his position within the union for personal benefit. That has since been corrected. After his removal the best course of action then seemed to halt contract negotiations until integration was complete. Why? Because it's hard to strike or bargain when there's no single seniority list.
I understand your distaste for the situation but try and be a little more professional about it. There's not a single person on this list that has chosen to be put in this situation. New fleet types along with additional certificates and a complete change to the business structure means things need to take time to be done correctly. Don't get me wrong I wish like no other that a new contract was in place yesterday but I won't pretend I'm ignorant enough to not understand why it isn't. Things worth having take time. Slowing things down to give us more leverage going forward definitely wasn't the easy road. Knock it all you'd like but anyone that takes a moment to look at the situation will know better. Sooner or later you're going to have to realize things are better when working together rather than taking cheap shots when able.
Assume for a minute that the NMB decides we are a single carrier, and then the IBT prevails in the representation drive. We are all IBT members, and there is already an IBT CBA in place. A combined/almagamated CBA will result using the existing IBT CBA.
If the IBT had continued their Section 6 negotiations and improved ANY section of the current CBA, we would all benefit from it in the combined CBA. Instead, we are stuck with the current POS CBA.
No workrules.
No duty limits.
No retirement.
No cancellation pay.
No training or vacation conflict drop protection.
Article 7 Vacancies is such an abomination that I just can't continue to read the rest of the CBA.
Why the IBT is sitting on their arses and not negotiating is simply mindboggling. The company is actually equally surprised, and pleased, at the IBT's complete lack of planning and representation.
If this scenario plays out, will the IBT then restart the Section 6 negotiations? Congrats, you just wasted two plus years at the table. That is two additional years of working under the same workrules and pay.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post