Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SkyWest Airlines to merge with ??????? >

SkyWest Airlines to merge with ???????

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest Airlines to merge with ???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2010 | 06:36 AM
  #81  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
I rather remain independent then let the most important part of our contract b trampled on and be relegated to seperate lists just so that JA can continue the whipsaw. But that's just me.
Tell me one instance where JA has whipsawed SkyWest and ASA. Honestly, it hasn't happened and many of you XJT guys are frustrated that you used to be a first class airline and now CAL has reduced you to operating at a loss. This merger is good for all of us, don't bite the hand that feeds
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 09:40 AM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Cut off your nose to spite your face...

Do you think WestAir would have been better off if Skywest had bought them?

You and I simply disagree on this. If given the choice of Skywest or Mesa, I would rather work for Skywest. You would rather have that ALPA card in your wallet while JO bends you over....
Yes, I would rather be part of one list with Mesa then two with SKW. We are already whipsawed by the mainline. No good reason why we should be part of being whipsawed by our own regional management as well. I have no problems disagreeing with anybody on this. I'm not married to this company or profession. Until pilots are willing to stand up and say enough is enough, management is going to continue cheering our race to the bottom. If more pilots had a backup plan they would be more willing to finally draw the line.

Originally Posted by duvie
Tell me one instance where JA has whipsawed SkyWest and ASA. Honestly, it hasn't happened and many of you XJT guys are frustrated that you used to be a first class airline and now CAL has reduced you to operating at a loss. This merger is good for all of us, don't bite the hand that feeds
Didn't some 700s that were slated to go to ASA during contract negotiations go to SKW instead? Do you think there is a reason why you gave up something to get language in your contract that prevents SKW from transferring aircraft without pilots?

Anyways, XJT has already been whipsawd by CAL with the helps of JA. That is why we were decimated. CAL told our CEO to either give them the cpa SKW had negotiated or get the 12 months notice. The cpa SKW negotiated with CAL not only included synergy cost savings but also took into consideration a 16% paycut JA wanted to give us in order to bring us into parity with SKW pilot compensation so that we can be cost competative when CAL put all 205 A/C up for bid again in 12 months. JA said himself his intention was to put up three bids for those 205 A/C. One from XJT, one from ASA, and one from SKW...but it was up to us if we wanted to be cost competitive. That on top of the fact that he was planning on taking 35 of XJT A/C and transferring them to SKW for their pilots to fly while furloughing 700 of ours and giving them preferential interviews at SKW.

Maybe you don't think you have been whipsawed but XJT definitely with JA's help.
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 09:51 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Didn't some 700s that were slated to go to ASA during contract negotiations go to SKW instead? Do you think there is a reason why you gave up something to get language in your contract that prevents SKW from transferring aircraft without pilots?
I always wanted to throw up in my mouth when on a long SLC sit there was CRJ7 with the SkyWest logo on the nose, but with an Echo Victor tail number

Originally Posted by Nevets
Anyways, XJT has already been whipsawd by CAL with the helps of JA. That is why we were decimated. CAL told our CEO to either give them the cpa SKW had negotiated or get the 12 months notice. The cpa SKW negotiated with CAL not only included synergy cost savings but also took into consideration a 16% paycut JA wanted to give us in order to bring us into parity with SKW pilot compensation so that we can be cost competative when CAL put all 205 A/C up for bid again in 12 months. JA said himself his intention was to put up three bids for those 205 A/C. One from XJT, one from ASA, and one from SKW...but it was up to us if we wanted to be cost competitive. That on top of the fact that he was planning on taking 35 of XJT A/C and transferring them to SKW for their pilots to fly while furloughing 700 of ours and giving them preferential interviews at SKW.

Maybe you don't think you have been whipsawed but XJT definitely with JA's help.
A shame all this revisionist history has to be covered to get a point across
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:26 AM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
I always wanted to throw up in my mouth when on a long SLC sit there was CRJ7 with the SkyWest logo on the nose, but with an Echo Victor tail number



A shame all this revisionist history has to be covered to get a point across
Its not revisionist history. Its the real history. I was in the room when JA and BR threw out their 12 month "lifeboat" for us.
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:27 AM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
Tell me one instance where JA has whipsawed SkyWest and ASA. Honestly, it hasn't happened and many of you XJT guys are frustrated that you used to be a first class airline and now CAL has reduced you to operating at a loss. This merger is good for all of us, don't bite the hand that feeds

I am in favor of one list because it makes us more powerful in negotiating. In addition, it will be difficult to do under their new CAL CPA that last 10 years. They have to re-fleet some of the XJT jets under the agreement and the agreement is between UAL/ASA, so the new jets will have to come to new Atlantic Southeast under the CPA so ASA can get out of the terrible XJT leases on the jets, again listen to the earnings call it was all laid out. In addition, they mentioned considering buying Comair if it could be worked out with DAL for a long term CPA, they felt Comair may be a good fit.
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:29 AM
  #86  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

I hear Cincinnati is a nice place in september.
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:32 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Its not revisionist history. Its the real history. I was in the room when JA and BR threw out their 12 month "lifeboat" for us.

Sorry for the poor wording, I simply meant that it has to be covered ad nauseum for those that are unaware of what happened.
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:48 AM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

It will be interesting to see how bad JA wants to keep SKY independent from the combined XJT/ASA. It is obvious he has wanted XJT and its large foot print at CAL for at least 3 years. Lets face it, is would cost $100 of millions to recreate that, and years to find people to operate 274 jets, etc., especially now that all the pilots out there will be dead broke from buying a 1000 more hours of flying. Not to mention he just doubled the size of his company. I don't see him walking away from this thing even if we have to combine, I mean what does it really cost him, 80% of his flying is already going to be done by union pilots?????
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:55 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by C5Pilot
Lets face it, is would cost $100 of millions to recreate that, and years to find people to operate 274 jets, etc.,
Indeed it would. Not only to SKW, but also to the Legacies they have agreements with. 274 may not be the number. I think it's safe to say that the 135's my stay parked. Possible not, but it's a strong possibility. Especially when the next fuel spike comes. You can probably toss in the older 145's as well. Toss in the desire for the Legacy airlines to reduce 50 seat airframes, an even less amount.

Originally Posted by C5Pilot
especially now that all the pilots out there will be dead broke from buying a 1000 more hours of flying.
Well, if the plan is/was anything like last time, JA will give the courtesy of hiring ALL the pilots that are on the street that used to fly those 274 planes. No need to buy flight time for them. Isn't that nice of him?
Reply
Old 08-19-2010 | 10:59 AM
  #90  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by C5Pilot
It will be interesting to see how bad JA wants to keep SKY independent from the combined XJT/ASA. It is obvious he has wanted XJT and its large foot print at CAL for at least 3 years. Lets face it, is would cost $100 of millions to recreate that, and years to find people to operate 274 jets, etc., especially now that all the pilots out there will be dead broke from buying a 1000 more hours of flying. Not to mention he just doubled the size of his company. I don't see him walking away from this thing even if we have to combine, I mean what does it really cost him, 80% of his flying is already going to be done by union pilots?????
It's just typical management threats. You guys just need to fold for the good of the operation. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Stand your ground XE. As a former XJT pilot, you've already lost enough since 2007.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bus Driver
Regional
328
03-10-2011 10:02 PM
11Fan
Hangar Talk
37
05-24-2010 05:08 PM
dimondan
Major
0
05-02-2010 07:46 PM
Past V1
Major
9
01-21-2010 05:56 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices