Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The New Pinnacle...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2010, 05:06 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by bored View Post
That said, it scares me to see the possibility of the 9E and 9L guys, who out number the XJ guys, vote for anything. I'm not saying that bunch of our new pilot group will sell themselves out, but let's be realistic here.

I'll have faith in the XJ MEC and negotiating committee, but the rest of the bunch has yet to prove themselves. I'll judge when the TA comes out. But until then, I remain cautious and fearful of the future. In the end, I'm more fearful of my overall quality of life at the new airline that will include training, mx, dispatch and flight ops support. We all know where Pinnacle and Colgan has historically stood on these issues and how wonderful mgmt has been towards both pilot groups.
This is the reason why LOTS of pinnacle pilots have a problem with xj pilots. This typical condescending attitude has got to stop. MESABA was bought by PINNACLE, not the other way around. I know it makes a lot of the mesaba pilots mad but that's the way it is. The mesaba ship was sinking AGAIN and pinnacle came in and made the purchase. Luckily the furloughed fo's I have had the pleasure to fly with see that and are thankfull that pinnacle hired them on when they didnt have to offer them anyrhing. I don't trust the mesaba mec any further than i could throw them. If it had been the other way around i have no doubt the mesaba pilots would be waiving the loa THEY wrote in our face and tell us we should be gratefull they are offering us a three to one deal.

You are a pinnacle pilot. Deal with it and join us or get out of the way and let those willing to get on board do.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 05:07 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laxrox43's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
Default

Thanks djrogs03!!! I have been trying to find this document on the ALPA website with no luck. My headache is over!

Let the reading begin!

Regards,
Laxrox43
Laxrox43 is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 05:32 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Colnago's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport View Post
This is the reason why LOTS of pinnacle pilots have a problem with xj pilots. This typical condescending attitude has got to stop. MESABA was bought by PINNACLE, not the other way around. I know it makes a lot of the mesaba pilots mad but that's the way it is. The mesaba ship was sinking AGAIN and pinnacle came in and made the purchase. Luckily the furloughed fo's I have had the pleasure to fly with see that and are thankfull that pinnacle hired them on when they didnt have to offer them anyrhing. I don't trust the mesaba mec any further than i could throw them. If it had been the other way around i have no doubt the mesaba pilots would be waiving the loa THEY wrote in our face and tell us we should be gratefull they are offering us a three to one deal.

You are a pinnacle pilot. Deal with it and join us or get out of the way and let those willing to get on board do.
What the...? That was uncalled for. You sound like you have an inferiority complex. Now that we all actually have some leverage you're gonna go and **** on the XJ guys?
Colnago is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 05:43 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by Colnago View Post
What the...? That was uncalled for. You sound like you have an inferiority complex. Now that we all actually have some leverage you're gonna go and **** on the XJ guys?
There's a lot of guys like that. The NC and MECs need to be sure to come to a quality TA that all can be happy with. Because 9E pilots (and assumedly 9L) are so hard up for new deal that they'll vote in anything.

Let's all pray that the JNC can hold their ground, make headway, and build off the Mesaba baseline.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 05:43 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Colnago View Post
What the...? That was uncalled for. You sound like you have an inferiority complex. Now that we all actually have some leverage you're gonna go and **** on the XJ guys?
I am sick of xj guys saying how scared they are to let colgan and pinnacle guys vote because we will take anything that we can. Try reading what he wrote before you read my response. He is pretty much saying you the colgan pilot will take any piece of crap they throw at you.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 06:00 PM
  #46  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by djrogs03 View Post
Q400 rates at Mesaba are the same as the CRJ 200 rates at Mesaba...FO's are still blended

As bored said above, alot of guys come on here and say everyone has to vote after the MEC's vote to approve this (if they do), and thats my worry of being sold out, I'll say it once, and I'll say it again, it's never good to go into a consolidation of labor groups having the best contract, because gains will be minimal...I'de like every person at 9E and 9L to read the XJ contract, as I'm sure some of you have, so you know what you are getting yourself into and consider that as a starting point for negotiations, not an ending...I have been hearing form the MEC leadership that not having XJ integrated is/will cost(ing) 9E management almost 1 million a month in excess cost and if no contract is negotiated and things remain seperate it will continue that way for a very long time. WE NEED TO GET THIS RIGHT...



No you didn't sell out on TA1 but I'm curious how close TA1 was to the current XJ contract? That's a question I've been asking since July 1 and no one seems to have an answer...
First off, the current XJ contract would NOT pass the 9E MEC. Not even with 1 vote. We do have TA2 sections that are good, XJ also has some good sections. The 9E group has shown it will throw trash back to the can. The point that I would like to make is simple- We have 3 groups creating 1 contract. The idea of "mesaba this" and "pinnacle that" is not even worth your breath because it's not even in play by those making decisions. We are all (all 3) working together for something that covers every pilot regardless of what uniform they currently wear. Is it easy? Heck NO! Can it be done? HECK YES! Every pilot under pinnacle CORP needs to understand that the more united we stand the more we can achieve. Period.
higney85 is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 06:10 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FSUpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Right Seat Gear Swinger
Posts: 490
Default

seems to me that nothing will get done if pilots from the 3 groups fight among themselves... I understand this is a message board, but if its like that in real life you will just make management happy and you will be stuck negotiating for another few years.

Im excited for the possibility of working for pinnacle... hopefully in the near future.. i would love to come in and vote for a decent contract. I havent been in the industry for long but I have been following things closely. Its kind of exciting in a way to hope to get on with a company just in the dawn of a new light. I hope there is a way new hires can possibly make a difference.
FSUpilot is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 07:01 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Colnago's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by bored View Post
I had a feeling Airsupport would come out of the blue and completely misunderstand my post. And I was right. You completely took my post out of context and went off on some tirade. Read my post again. You sir are the one with a an obvious chip on your shoulder and is overly sensitive. My post was not veiled in arrogance or carried a condecending tone. If you interpreted that way, that's your fault and your sensitivity. You may not agree with what I said, but it is the simple truth. Colgan + Pinnacle out number Mesaba. I'll say it again, there is a possibility that a Pinnacle + Colgan majority could vote something in that is marginally better for a Mesaba pilot and very much better for a Colgan or Pinnacle pilot. Those are the facts, by sheer numbers and expectations. I do NOT believe that every Colgan pilot, or Pinnacle pilot would vote at the first offer, just for the sake of it. However, it is not out of the realm of possibility given the reasons I mentioned before that a few just might.

I believe we should all be in this together. But don't forget that this being together stuff involves 3 different pilot groups coming from 3 different perspectives and expectations trying to all be happy as one. It won't be easy and it will hopefully come with lively, professional and civil debate. I also hope that the total nonsense, and you know what I'm talking about, that is over at your airlinkpilots webboard is the vocal minority that needs to get a clue. And spare me the "we saved your butt, you should be lucky" BS. THAT sir, is what will divide us.
I agree with you. The way I see it is that the previous 9E TA was turned down by the pilots (good job) but it was only by a small percentage that it didn't pass (correct me if I'm wrong). Given that there were numerous people who actually DID vote in favor of it, I would expect it wouldn't take much to have the same people vote in favor of an XJ-status-quo TA.

I understand that it is terrible for the 9E pilots to have been working with a bad contract for so long and I seriously commend them all for not giving in easily. However, we're humans and I suspect impatience will get the best of some.
Colnago is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 07:24 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by bored View Post
I had a feeling Airsupport would come out of the blue and completely misunderstand my post. And I was right. You completely took my post out of context and went off on some tirade. Read my post again. You sir are the one with a an obvious chip on your shoulder and is overly sensitive. My post was not veiled in arrogance or carried a condecending tone. If you interpreted that way, that's your fault and your sensitivity. You may not agree with what I said, but it is the simple truth. Colgan + Pinnacle out number Mesaba. I'll say it again, there is a possibility that a Pinnacle + Colgan majority could vote something in that is marginally better for a Mesaba pilot and very much better for a Colgan or Pinnacle pilot. Those are the facts, by sheer numbers and expectations. I do NOT believe that every Colgan pilot, or Pinnacle pilot would vote at the first offer, just for the sake of it. However, it is not out of the realm of possibility given the reasons I mentioned before that a few just might.

I believe we should all be in this together. But don't forget that this being together stuff involves 3 different pilot groups coming from 3 different perspectives and expectations trying to all be happy as one. It won't be easy and it will hopefully come with lively, professional and civil debate. I also hope that the total nonsense, and you know what I'm talking about, that is over at your airlinkpilots webboard is the vocal minority that needs to get a clue. And spare me the "we saved your butt, you should be lucky" BS. THAT sir, is what will divide us.

ha bored. If you knew I was going to go off like that then you instigated my rant! Here is the thing. If it was just you saying that then I wouldn't care. You and I have gone round and round about this stuff for a few years now and I would just blow it off if you were the only one saying it. However other mesaba pilots are saying the same thing. That is what is getting to me. And its not being overly sensitive. Its sticking up for the pilots who gave up ALOT by negotiating for over 5 years and then voting down a TA so we could do better. I personally have seen more than $25,000 dollars disappear since we voted down that TA almost 1 year ago (and $15,000) of that I will never get back. The 52% of us that voted no took a huge gamble in sending it back to the company. We had no idea what the outcome was going to be. Little did we know that the NMB would put us on ice. We had no idea that pinnacle was going to buy another airline. We didn't know the path the no vote was going to take us but we made that choice. A little respect for those that stood up would do nicely.

And you are also misinterpreting what I said. I never once said pinnacle "saved" mesaba. I said that pinnacle saw a business opportunity and took it. They do not care about the mesaba pilots or people. They care about the business. Luckily however for the mesaba guys our MEC that you don't trust went to the company and got a deal worked out that would allow people that didn't have a job to go to to come over to pinnacle and join our ranks while things are being worked out. And not only did the MEC you dont trust get that deal they worked it out so the pilots could keep their longevity for everything. So instead of saying the pinnacle MEC needs to earn your respect how about showing them some for all they have done so far.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 07:28 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
There's a lot of guys like that. The NC and MECs need to be sure to come to a quality TA that all can be happy with. Because 9E pilots (and assumedly 9L) are so hard up for new deal that they'll vote in anything.

Let's all pray that the JNC can hold their ground, make headway, and build off the Mesaba baseline.

Like I said earlier, we will vote for anything right. Just like the TA that passed last year??
Airsupport is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
vtx531
Regional
78
07-01-2010 05:36 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
mike51135
Regional
139
06-12-2008 06:09 PM
stbloc
Regional
13
05-01-2008 04:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices