Pinnacle / Colgan Seniority List
03-07-2011 | 05:56 AM
#21
New Hire
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
[QUOTE
=Mesabah;958971]This will obviously go to arbitration. If I were any of the SLI negotiators, I wouldn't want my name on anything that had to do with this integration. Also, Delta is probably going to keep the Saabs flying so there was no longer the threat of furloughing additional pilots at XJ.
9E did not buy XJ, we were purchased as a wholly owned subsidy of PNCL holdings. PNCL decided to merge us together to take advantage of the "synergy's" associated with operating common fleet types; Big difference.[/QUOTE]
How does it feel to be owned again except by pinnacle this time. It takes your ego down a notch which you guys needed.
=Mesabah;958971]This will obviously go to arbitration. If I were any of the SLI negotiators, I wouldn't want my name on anything that had to do with this integration. Also, Delta is probably going to keep the Saabs flying so there was no longer the threat of furloughing additional pilots at XJ.
9E did not buy XJ, we were purchased as a wholly owned subsidy of PNCL holdings. PNCL decided to merge us together to take advantage of the "synergy's" associated with operating common fleet types; Big difference.[/QUOTE]
How does it feel to be owned again except by pinnacle this time. It takes your ego down a notch which you guys needed.
03-07-2011 | 06:30 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
03-07-2011 | 08:15 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Wrong. A violation of scope would be any flying performed by Pinnacle Inc (we will leave out the inc/corp semantics this time) with pilots NOT on the Pinnacle seniority list. So if Pinnacle Inc bought Colgan, without merging the lists, it would have been a violation of scope wether or not the flew DL codeshare, CO/UA, or Aeroflot....that definition was straight from our contract....
03-07-2011 | 08:23 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
Wrong. A violation of scope would be any flying performed by Pinnacle Inc (we will leave out the inc/corp semantics this time) with pilots NOT on the Pinnacle seniority list. So if Pinnacle Inc bought Colgan, without merging the lists, it would have been a violation of scope wether or not the flew DL codeshare, CO/UA, or Aeroflot....that definition was straight from our contract....
03-07-2011 | 08:28 AM
#26
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Wrong. A violation of scope would be any flying performed by Pinnacle Inc (we will leave out the inc/corp semantics this time) with pilots NOT on the Pinnacle seniority list. So if Pinnacle Inc bought Colgan, without merging the lists, it would have been a violation of scope wether or not the flew DL codeshare, CO/UA, or Aeroflot....that definition was straight from our contract....
03-07-2011 | 08:34 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
^^^^ What IB said is correct. Codeshare means nothing with regards to scope violation. If XJ would have bought Air Missouri, who flew for United, and transferred assets to Air Missouri, it would have been in violation of Mesaba scope, even if Air Missouri didn't fly for Delta or NWA like Mesaba does. Scope cares nothing about WHO you fly for codewise, what matters is who purchased/started you with their assets.
We are all going to have fun drinking and laughing about this on overnights together.
03-07-2011 | 08:37 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
re read what he wrote. it says leave out the INC/CORP semantics for the sole purpose of showing you it is not the codeshare that determins violation, it is where you get your assets/who purchases you as I said in my previous post.
03-07-2011 | 08:38 AM
#29
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
^^^^ What IB said is correct. Codeshare means nothing with regards to scope violation. If XJ would have bought Air Missouri, who flew for United, and transferred assets to Air Missouri, it would have been in violation of Mesaba scope, even if Air Missouri didn't fly for Delta or NWA like Mesaba does. Scope cares nothing about WHO you fly for codewise, what matters is who purchased/started you with their assets.
03-07-2011 | 08:38 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
You are buying by the way...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
