Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
American Eagle application >

American Eagle application

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

American Eagle application

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2011 | 07:51 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Emb/FO
Default

Anyone interviewing Sept 8th? If interested in meeting up day before to study, let me know. I'll be at the Candlwood.
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 11:28 AM
  #52  
TXHillCountry's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Golf cart, Left seat. Retired B-767/757
Default Eagle interviews

Sincere good luck to all interviewing with AE. I've heard Eagle has zero backlog of applications and, therefor, needing new-hires. Can anyone confirm/refute Eagles lack of 'inventory'? Just curious if anyone has a feel for the hire ratio compared to those interviewing.

Having served a tour at AE, I find all the applicant concern over previous checkride busts a bit ironic.

AE has been known for it's 'baseball' mentality for at least the last 15 years I've trained and trained with AE pilots and ex-AE pilots. Baseball? Yeh, 3 strikes and you're out. Actually, most guys opt to resign prior to the 3rd strike to 'protect' their training record.

This 3 strike rule is so onerous, I once told the AE director of training he needed to hire more teachers and fewer umpires. The best thing any new-hire can hope is to be paired with a CA upgrade. He/she can be your best tutor/mentor and a substantial asset to you get you through the sim and on to line training.
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 11:48 AM
  #53  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Is it me or is AE seem more stringent on logbooks?
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 11:53 AM
  #54  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 61
Default

Originally Posted by flyingskinz
Is it me or is AE seem more stringent on logbooks?
As long as the logbooks are in order it seems to be ok, my concern is being written off because I have to many check ride failures in their eyes.
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 12:43 PM
  #55  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
As long as the logbooks are in order it seems to be ok, my concern is being written off because I have to many check ride failures in their eyes.
Are these pink-slip failures or prior airline indoc failures? I believe that failing Part 121 training is detrimental to someone's flying career.
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 01:09 PM
  #56  
Stryker's Avatar
Kept down by the man
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

A large majority of those interviewing do NOT have any 121 experience. My class of 34 had 2 people with prior experience. These failures they are looking at are failures prior to flying for hire (mostly), but failures in 121/135 definitely play into their decision making process im sure.
Reply
Old 09-04-2011 | 01:18 PM
  #57  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Stryker
A large majority of those interviewing do NOT have any 121 experience. My class of 34 had 2 people with prior experience. These failures they are looking at are failures prior to flying for hire (mostly), but failures in 121/135 definitely play into their decision making process im sure.
Will airlines even look at you if you failed to complete (unsat) 121/135 training before? Is it as bad as failing an airline checkride?
Reply
Old 09-06-2011 | 02:10 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by flyingskinz
Is it me or is AE seem more stringent on logbooks?

You think they're stringent now.... ???

gotta love newbies

Yes, compared to other regionals, they're stringent... but nothing like they used to be. They'd interview 40 and hire 1... and that was when you had to have min of 2,000 TT with an ATP to apply, and 5,000 with an ATP and some turbine PIC was just to be competative for the interview.
Reply
Old 09-06-2011 | 03:07 PM
  #59  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 61
Default

Originally Posted by flyingskinz
Are these pink-slip failures or prior airline indoc failures? I believe that failing Part 121 training is detrimental to someone's flying career.
Pink Slips, but if I don't get the call for it I'm ok with it. I'm comfortable with my flying skills and if they think my failures are indicative to the pilot I am, well it's their loss.

Last edited by Cruz5350; 09-06-2011 at 03:19 PM.
Reply
Old 09-06-2011 | 03:28 PM
  #60  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Emb 145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by flyingskinz
Is it me or is AE seem more stringent on logbooks?

What types of things are being scrutinized when they look over your logbook? Logbooks always seemed to be pretty cut and dry to me, maybe I am missing something?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
35
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
FlyinSunset1
Major
14
01-28-2009 08:49 PM
Noleone
Regional
7
09-21-2007 07:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices