Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
RAH: "The start of a new direction..." >

RAH: "The start of a new direction..."

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH: "The start of a new direction..."

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2011 | 08:42 AM
  #131  
Jetalc's Avatar
Pro Button Pusher
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: A320 Series CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ronaldo
Yes, I do think. Maybe, you've figured out that I won't support any level of RAH involvement in F9, unless we divest 100%. Any level of ownership >0%, is too much not to have an integrated seniority list.

For the next contract I'll push for scope tied to revenue, and .00000001% ownership, any management sharing, or liability will qualify for an integrated seniority list.

And we all know that RAHers will have a new CBA about 5 years after BBs new brat starts grad school.
Good luck with that - I would think there would be more important issues, like maybe not agreeing to poverty wages? 0.00000001%?? Still sticking by your whipsaw argument while giving away the rest of your quality of life. And "scope?" Please...I think your priorities are all screwed up.
Reply
Old 11-28-2011 | 09:19 AM
  #132  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jetalc
Good luck with that - I would think there would be more important issues, like maybe not agreeing to poverty wages? 0.00000001%?? Still sticking by your whipsaw argument while giving away the rest of your quality of life. And "scope?" Please...I think your priorities are all screwed up.
Scope is directly related to pay protection/growth.
Reply
Old 11-28-2011 | 01:45 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Under beer over couch after skool
Default

Originally Posted by Jetalc
Good luck with that - I would think there would be more important issues, like maybe not agreeing to poverty wages? 0.00000001%?? Still sticking by your whipsaw argument while giving away the rest of your quality of life. And "scope?" Please...I think your priorities are all screwed up.
I know people come on here and tout scope and it agitates some of you F9ers (and others) but I firmly believe scope is a necessity. If BB spins off 51% of F9 and continues to "run it", what keeps him from then signing a deal under the F9 side of the business, thereby replacing FFD flying that's currently on the legacy RAH side? These antics to partially sell F9 have put legacy RAH jobs at risk of whipsaw again (IF RAH maintains control/large stakeholder position) in F9. So yes, we need to tighten up scope and the remainder of the contract.

I still think FAPA dropped the ball by allowing Lynx to be created outside the FAPA list, but hey, you didn't ask me, so I won't ask you how to protect scope.

It's fairly simple really, RAH pilots doing flying that benefits RAH, and f'ing pay me.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 07:21 AM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

How many A/C does Republic holdings operate for AMR?
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 07:43 AM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: ERJ-170
Default

Originally Posted by ridered
How many A/C does Republic holdings operate for AMR?
13 maybe 14 including a spare.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 07:44 AM
  #136  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ridered
How many A/C does Republic holdings operate for AMR?
14 140's but they were already scheduled for cancellation in 2012.

Much more important to watch is how eagle is treated during the AMR restructuring. AMR is carrying over $2 billion dollars of Eagle RJ lease debt.

Plan A was to protect shareholders and spin Eagle off.

Plan B, the Ch. 11 filing, has destroyed shareholder equity. Now all they want to do is shed 50 seat RJ debt and they are no longer responsible to the shareholders.

Crystal ball....

Chautauqua is cleaved off of RAH.

Republic certificate is terminated as 190's go away (to F9 or someone else)

Shuttle cert and aircraft go to AMR.

RAH divests FFD instead of brand and IPO's Frontier.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 08:32 AM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zoooropa
Crystal ball....

Chautauqua is cleaved off of RAH.

Republic certificate is terminated as 190's go away (to F9 or someone else)

Shuttle cert and aircraft go to AMR.

RAH divests FFD instead of brand and IPO's Frontier.
That would be a total mess because of the contractual issues. Unless, of course, they were released to self help, but the RAH pilots would never let that happen.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 08:33 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Default


Crystal ball....

Chautauqua is cleaved off of RAH.

Republic certificate is terminated as 190's go away (to F9 or someone else)

Shuttle cert and aircraft go to AMR.

RAH divests FFD instead of brand and IPO's Frontier.
The Republic certificate will not be terminated, they fly for US Airways.
The Shuttle certificate has nothing to do with AMR.
Frontier is the likely candidate to be divested, not RAH.
Chautauqua is a worthless certificate with the exception of Delta/US Airways contracts. Likely the pilots will be displaced to Republic/Shuttle, then cleave off Chautauqua. One seniority list dictates where RAHs pilots go, not the sale of a certificate.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 10:15 AM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
That would be a total mess because of the contractual issues. Unless, of course, they were released to self help, but the RAH pilots would never let that happen.
I would submit that no matter WHAT happens it's going to be a total mess.
Reply
Old 11-29-2011 | 10:58 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aviatormjc
Frontier is the likely candidate to be divested, not RAH.
*Fingers crossed*
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PhantomAir
Flight Schools and Training
43
10-02-2020 01:25 PM
CitationJason
Part 135
52
06-22-2017 11:29 AM
Jason4275
Flight Schools and Training
23
03-17-2016 07:16 PM
joel payne
JetBlue
15
11-10-2006 04:43 PM
CRJ-200
Flight Schools and Training
23
08-12-2006 09:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices