Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
RAH: "The start of a new direction..." >

RAH: "The start of a new direction..."

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH: "The start of a new direction..."

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2011 | 04:27 AM
  #161  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ronaldo
BB stated that he expected to see scope erosion at AA within the short term. He expected that erosion to come in a contract but I think secretly he thought the bankruptcy would yield it.

I doubt BB will shed any certificates. He might move some planes around and violate some CBAs, LsOA and "Commercial Agreements" but that's business as usual for the loincloth wearing shaman.

As far as the lawsuit for LOA 67, I don't see how preventing the formation of a shell company has anything to do with BB seeking scope relief from AA (assuming that's what he'll do). If anything, that lawsuit, if successful, will keep BB from obtaining that scope relief, moving A/C over to the shell company and whipsawing the legacy RAHers.

But at the rate FAPA's lawsuit against the integration, and IBT's lawsuit against FAPAInvest LLC are proceeding, we'll have an answer on the wall before we could have made a supportable assessment.

How can you use a group that makes more money to whipsaw the group that makes less? Unless F9 is going to take poverty wages just to **** us off, in which case your argument that you did your time at a regional goes out the window.
Reply
Old 12-02-2011 | 04:35 AM
  #162  
RPC Unity's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slumav505
How can you use a group that makes more money to whipsaw the group that makes less? Unless F9 is going to take poverty wages just to **** us off, in which case your argument that you did your time at a regional goes out the window.
We already had that opportunity when BB put 190 rates on the white board during the LOA 67 negotiations.

They were higher in both seats and every year of longevity than your current rates, but we still said no thanks for a variety of reasons.

One reason was the fact that we didn't want to negatively impact your current negotiations. Had we known that the IBT was going to sue us in an effort to overturn the LOA, I am pretty sure you would see 190 rates in our CBA and 190's on the F9 certificate.
Reply
Old 12-02-2011 | 05:21 AM
  #163  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Default

Slum. You affect our negotiations every day... Just like freedom and go jets. Sleeping with management will do that.
Reply
Old 12-02-2011 | 06:23 AM
  #164  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
Slum. You affect our negotiations every day... Just like freedom and go jets. Sleeping with management will do that.

Me? Pretty sure we are on the same team. Tier 3 FO, ready to burn the place down for a liveable wage. Pretty sure you meant RPC.

Regardless of where the 190's are, it's one list so it's not a gigantic threat. They are not fenced but the training costs alone that would be associated with retraining almost guarantee that won't happen.

You will learn BB is pretty oblivious to a group that actually will actually hold him and WH accountable to the contract it what is legal. He never had that from the 747 here, so when the new regime took over they are having to change the way the play. Green team is walking down the same path that the 747 and GS did.
Reply
Old 12-02-2011 | 08:18 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Under beer over couch after skool
Default

Originally Posted by slumav505
How can you use a group that makes more money to whipsaw the group that makes less? Unless F9 is going to take poverty wages just to **** us off, in which case your argument that you did your time at a regional goes out the window.

This issue isn't F9 pilots doing the flying, it's new pilots getting hired on, at a subpar rate (worse than ours? is that possible?). Then BB shifts anything he wants over to the F9 "company" without worrying about a STS, seniority list, or legacy CBA restrictions. All is possible, when BB has less than half ownership but near full control. The seniority list won't matter.
Reply
Old 12-03-2011 | 02:13 PM
  #166  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ronaldo
This issue isn't F9 pilots doing the flying, it's new pilots getting hired on, at a subpar rate (worse than ours? is that possible?). Then BB shifts anything he wants over to the F9 "company" without worrying about a STS, seniority list, or legacy CBA restrictions. All is possible, when BB has less than half ownership but near full control. The seniority list won't matter.

That's for the NMB to decide.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 11:06 AM
  #167  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default Teamster Lanyard

So recently I've heard that several Rp pilots being denied j/s and cabin seats because they wouldn not remove their Teamster Lanyard? I know of one incident where the F9 cpt was having a discipline review over that? Any news to the outcome? Seriously its just a lanyard and is it worth denying someone a ride to work?
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 11:51 AM
  #168  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skygrl67
So recently I've heard that several Rp pilots being denied j/s and cabin seats because they wouldn not remove their Teamster Lanyard? I know of one incident where the F9 cpt was having a discipline review over that? Any news to the outcome? Seriously its just a lanyard and is it worth denying someone a ride to work?
There was a review of the incident and the F9 captain in question was not disciplined. He was awarded the "employee of the month" parking spot at DIA.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 12:17 PM
  #169  
slumav505's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by skygrl67
So recently I've heard that several Rp pilots being denied j/s and cabin seats because they wouldn not remove their Teamster Lanyard? I know of one incident where the F9 cpt was having a discipline review over that? Any news to the outcome? Seriously its just a lanyard and is it worth denying someone a ride to work?
It's true, at least the asking to remove the lanyard part. I know the pilot affected. Lanyard wars still continues.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 01:08 PM
  #170  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Why would he be rewarded for acting like a child? The pilot wasnt riding in the js, he was riding in the cabin in an open seat. My suggestion is to grow up... This is getting way too old. I understand you are all frustrated that a "regional" bought your beloved airline, but time to face facts and enjoy employment or move on. That lanyard had nothing to do with the F9 purchase as Teamsters has been fighting for a new contract yrs before that. I think you guys should continue to do that and see how far it gets you if you think its worth it. Seriously your not going to be coddled forever...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PhantomAir
Flight Schools and Training
43
10-02-2020 01:25 PM
CitationJason
Part 135
52
06-22-2017 11:29 AM
Jason4275
Flight Schools and Training
23
03-17-2016 07:16 PM
joel payne
JetBlue
15
11-10-2006 04:43 PM
CRJ-200
Flight Schools and Training
23
08-12-2006 09:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices