Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Who really has a shot at PNCL's Q400's? >

Who really has a shot at PNCL's Q400's?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Who really has a shot at PNCL's Q400's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2012 | 08:14 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot
In the last year at Express, I can think of 1 time that we were weight restricted. Out of MCI to DEN, carrying an alternate, 20 or so military guys who check 15+ heavy bags and maxed out our cargo bin. We took 10 bags out and they sent them on a flight an hour later and we went out full.
I commute on Expressjet and I see it frequently enough to pray one of the bent wing jets pulls into parking so it won't be an issue. I have no idea if it is landing or takeoff weight related. The Q400 is a lowly prop but it carries 74 adults, 114 bags, and a jumpseater 99% of the time...if it ain't broken.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 09:07 AM
  #62  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by visceral
I commute on Expressjet and I see it frequently enough to pray one of the bent wing jets pulls into parking so it won't be an issue. I have no idea if it is landing or takeoff weight related. The Q400 is a lowly prop but it carries 74 adults, 114 bags, and a jumpseater 99% of the time...if it ain't broken.
You must live in a city where one of our EPs still operates. They are slowly going away, but only slowly. If its a captain that cares usually we can take a few hundred pounds less fuel and its a none issue. Any of our other 200 airplanes can take 52 and max bags everytime, but that doesn't help you if you live in those few select cities. We have 2 usuable jumpseats so 99% of the time commuters prefer us, but again, those EPs are the exception.

Last edited by JetBlast77; 04-05-2012 at 09:20 AM.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 09:21 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Default

at Eagle all our 145s are heavy weight mod, and we RARELY see any problems, unless its a full boat and a really short flight, with a bunch of extra gas.

Now the 135/140, well that is a different story.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 09:27 AM
  #64  
TBucket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
You must live in a city where one of our EPs still operates. They are slowly going away, but only slowly. If its a captain that cares usually we can take a few hundred pounds less fuel and its a none issue. Any of our other 200 airplanes can take 52 and max bags everytime, but that doesn't help you if you live in those few select cities. We have 2 usuable jumpseats so 99% of the time commuters prefer us, but again, those EPs are the exception.

Good god, I hate EPs. My record weight restriction on one of those was 25 people out of EWR to IAD. (Booked to 52, of course).
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 10:01 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Swing that gear
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
Westjets first airplanes were old SWA planes... I think they would go for used cheap planes, over new From the factory...
WJ started in 96 and now has 98 airplanes. They are getting at least 6 new airplanes a year through 2016. You won't find an old retired plane in their fleet plan.

The Q's will get split up... they won't all go to the same company if PNCL doesn't keep them.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 10:09 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Yabadaba
The Q's will get split up... they won't all go to the same company if PNCL doesn't keep them.
dont agree. 35 airplanes of such a rare type would be far too expensive to split up. 2 different companys flying 17 and 18 rare planes each would cost united far more then just 1 company.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 12:17 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
You must live in a city where one of our EPs still operates. They are slowly going away, but only slowly. If its a captain that cares usually we can take a few hundred pounds less fuel and its a none issue. Any of our other 200 airplanes can take 52 and max bags everytime, but that doesn't help you if you live in those few select cities. We have 2 usuable jumpseats so 99% of the time commuters prefer us, but again, those EPs are the exception.
Sorry man but are you new? Where'd you get that the EP's are going away? It'd be nice if they did but I haven't seen them being parked really. There are only 23 of them but unless you know something I don't, I think that number has stayed pretty constant in the five years I've been here. And not to nitpick but the other 200+ can't take 52 pax plus all bags everytime. Usually they can but if you've ever done Columbus/Milwaukee/etc to Houston on an LR - and more and more that's a daily occurrence - you know it can be a struggle to get 48 or 49 on no matter how creative you get.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 12:30 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Swing that gear
Default

Originally Posted by sticky
dont agree. 35 airplanes of such a rare type would be far too expensive to split up. 2 different companys flying 17 and 18 rare planes each would cost united far more then just 1 company.
390 Q 400's (1050+ Dash 8) flying don't make them that rare. Most are out of North America so it may seem like it.

Where did the 11 Lynx planes go? Horizon, Skyservice, Western Europe, and RAH I think? Doubt anyone wants or has the money for 35 extra planes right now... especially in the US.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 12:52 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Yabadaba
390 Q 400's (1050+ Dash 8) flying don't make them that rare. Most are out of North America so it may seem like it.

Where did the 11 Lynx planes go? Horizon, Skyservice, Western Europe, and RAH I think? Doubt anyone wants or has the money for 35 extra planes right now... especially in the US.
I dont mean to start a fight or anything, but im not sure you understand how this all works. If RAH or SKW are quoted a lease rate that allows a profit with the fixed fee from UAL, then its an instant money maker.....on paper. Its up to the individual company to balance the cost of crews and other staffing requirements within the profit on paper to determine if its viable.

The Q is a rare plane is the sense theres only so many flying in the USA. The only USA carrier that flys for UAL and currently has a complete and ready Q program is RAH.
Reply
Old 04-05-2012 | 01:07 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Swing that gear
Default

Originally Posted by sticky
I dont mean to start a fight or anything, but im not sure you understand how this all works. If RAH or SKW are quoted a lease rate that allows a profit with the fixed fee from UAL, then its an instant money maker.....on paper. Its up to the individual company to balance the cost of crews and other staffing requirements within the profit on paper to determine if its viable.

The Q is a rare plane is the sense theres only so many flying in the USA. The only USA carrier that flys for UAL and currently has a complete and ready Q program is RAH.
Yes, I follow your reasoning but I don't think you can find a US carrier that is looking at adding capacity right now... especially fixed fee from UAL. Bedford already tried to pimp out Q's to all the major carriers with no luck. Colgans agreement with Continential was cost only for 3 years so Continental got the better of that deal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaxQ
Regional
18
09-29-2010 04:53 PM
Cessnadriver
Major
14
07-06-2010 10:23 PM
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
30
12-04-2008 07:00 AM
rthompsonjr
Hangar Talk
1
10-02-2008 10:30 AM
BusDriverPNW
Regional
2
01-19-2007 10:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices