Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

401K Dues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2012, 08:47 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant View Post
I don't really care what you think of the DPA, but this piece of information is correct...It is public record that this is what the President of ALPA makes....
Wrong. Not even close.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 09:11 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

I wonder why instead of passing an amendment that says all 401k contributions are will not be charged dues. Instead they pass that they will be charged and lower the dues by .05% If the government says that they will make 401k's tax exempt why cant ALPA?

For the person who asked what is going on. ALPA is making all 401k contributions to be consider income and charge the normal dues starting on jan 1 2014. Current by laws say if your company has only a 401k retirement plan you are exempt from paying dues on that portion of your pay. If your company has more than a 401k available you will be charged the ALPA dues.
tom14cat14 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 09:13 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by tom14cat14 View Post
I wonder why instead of passing an amendment that says all 401k contributions are will not be charged dues.
Because a $7 million hit to dues revenue would require ALPA to drastically reduce services that are important to the membership.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 09:35 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128 View Post
Because a $7 million hit to dues revenue would require ALPA to drastically reduce services that are important to the membership.
Do you know the number for taxing all 401k vs. not and how much they will loose from the dues drop? If you do know is there a place to look this up? Thanks for the input
tom14cat14 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 10:02 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by tom14cat14 View Post
I wonder why instead of passing an amendment that says all 401k contributions are will not be charged dues.
Because a $7 million hit to dues revenue would require ALPA to drastically reduce services that are important to the membership.
How much more or less will ALPA dues generate now with this change?
Nevets is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 02:22 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by tom14cat14 View Post
Do you know the number for taxing all 401k vs. not and how much they will loose from the dues drop? If you do know is there a place to look this up? Thanks for the input
If all 401k contributions were duesable, then the net effect to dues revenue would be about a $2 million increase. With no 401k contributions being duesable, the net effect would be about a $7 million reduction in dues revenue. This assumes no change to the dues rate itself.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 02:23 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
How much more or less will ALPA dues generate now with this change?
With the compromise that was ratified, the net effect to dues revenue is a $600k loss.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 03:33 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FixTheMess's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 238
Default

Am I correctly understanding that under the old rule, a pilot who had to contribute to his 401K in order to receive a company match had those contributions figured in as income for his dues calculation, while a different pilot who made the same contributions, but had no company match did not pay dues on his contributions?

Last edited by FixTheMess; 10-19-2012 at 03:44 AM.
FixTheMess is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 03:40 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128 View Post
Because a $7 million hit to dues revenue would require ALPA to drastically reduce services that are important to the membership.
Or reduce the insane salaries of ALPA employees.
Red Forman is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 05:43 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by FixTheMess View Post
Am I correctly understanding that under the old rule, a pilot who had to contribute to his 401K in order to receive a company match had those contributions figured in as income for his dues calculation, while a different pilot who made the same contributions, but had no company match did not pay dues on his contributions?
No, not quite. The company match isn't the issue. The problem was that a pilot who contributed to his 401k at an airline that didn't have a second retirement plan would only be paying dues on his after-401k income, while a pilot who didn't contribute to his 401k would be paying dues on his gross income. So two pilots at the same airline making the same gross income could be paying different effective dues rates.
PCL_128 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
Low & Slow
Union Talk
36
10-21-2008 07:18 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
9
09-01-2007 04:57 PM
sigtauenus
Money Talk
9
07-19-2007 08:22 AM
ToiletDuck
Money Talk
30
01-07-2007 05:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices