Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle is done; let's bow out with dignity. >

Pinnacle is done; let's bow out with dignity.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle is done; let's bow out with dignity.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2012 | 09:19 PM
  #141  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
I've been hearing for a while now that Delta was over staffed since the merger. So I don't think your estimate of 800 positions is very accurate. Just saying.... Also, it seems your vision is very narrow. You seem to defend Delta for all their business decisions, and to me it appears that you have forgotten where you came from. Congratulations to you for getting hired at mother Delta, but working for Delta may not be everyone's dream. The scope of Deltas actions is a lot bigger than adding 200 or so positions. Try looking at the thousands of people that lose their jobs because of greedy investors, or all the smaller communities that lose their service because of Deltas egotistical view on prop airplanes. I hear all the time from Delta pilots how the regionals should have stayed commuter and never been given jets. Now, I ask you this, how is this possible with Deltas view on turboprops? The regionals took many years to get to the level they are at now, and Deltas expedited reduction is hurting a lot of good people, and good families. What is the rush? You say it's just business, and maybe that's the way it is now. But not that long ago employers used to show compassion, and not just look at the almighty dollar

Um....what? So what you're saying is it's only Delta execs reducing service, outsourcing to the lowest bidder, & maximizing profits? Because you're wrong. They all do it. Are you saying Pinnacle cares for it's employees? Or ExpressJet, PSA, Piedmont, Us Air, Mesa, UAL, American Airlines, TranStates, Republic, or Spirit to name a few? Don't try to single Delta out, because you can't. Check out UAL's latest scope proposal. It's almost identical to DAL.

And where am I'm cheering for loss of jobs? I'm simply stating facts that pilot jobs are being shifted back to mainline. And many of the smaller communities you mention only have service because the airports are part of EAS routes. Service will not stop to those communities. It just won't be on Delta. And if it does, gripe to the government. They control it. And Delta still uses EMB120's operated by Skywest and SF340's operated by Silver Airways.

I have not forgot where I came from, or how I got to where I am. But I'm tired of seeing people point fingers at Delta pilots for Pinnacle's problems. Pinnacle is in the situation they are because of one reason, and that's Pinnacle management.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 09:36 PM
  #142  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Um....what? So what you're saying is it's only Delta execs reducing service, outsourcing to the lowest bidder, & maximizing profits? Because you're wrong. They all do it. Are you saying Pinnacle cares for it's employees? Or ExpressJet, PSA, Piedmont, Us Air, Mesa, UAL, American Airlines, TranStates, Republic, or Spirit to name a few? Don't try to single Delta out, because you can't. Check out UAL's latest scope proposal. It's almost identical to DAL.

And where am I'm cheering for loss of jobs? I'm simply stating facts that pilot jobs are being shifted back to mainline. And many of the smaller communities you mention only have service because the airports are part of EAS routes. Service will not stop to those communities. It just won't be on Delta. And if it does, gripe to the government. They control it. And Delta still uses EMB120's operated by Skywest and SF340's operated by Silver Airways.

I have not forgot where I came from, or how I got to where I am. But I'm tired of seeing people point fingers at Delta pilots for Pinnacle's problems. Pinnacle is in the situation they are because of one reason, and that's Pinnacle management.
Have you compared the rates "before" and "after"? Do you really see the aftermath?

Feel free to bite back, be sure to research first. I remember high school, with parents and friends completely nieve to reality, welcome to the club. Denial is the best avenue to happiness.

While mgmt did screw it up, your posts give off every bit of stereotype involving "moving on and bashing the past".
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 05:56 AM
  #143  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
Have you compared the rates "before" and "after"? Do you really see the aftermath?

Feel free to bite back, be sure to research first. I remember high school, with parents and friends completely nieve to reality, welcome to the club. Denial is the best avenue to happiness.

While mgmt did screw it up, your posts give off every bit of stereotype involving "moving on and bashing the past".
If you're referring to 9e proposed concesssionary rates, I fail to see how that is relevant to my point. Delta pilots did not create those rates. Delta pilots latest contract didn't create those rates. Bankruptcy creates those rates.

How am I bashing the past? I hold no ill will towards regional pilots. Show me where I've put any blame on the pilots. My coming on here and defending Delta pilots is in no way "moving on and bashing the past". I also flew for a regional were pilots were paid more to fly 50 seaters then most 51+ seat operators.

And explain to me just exactly what I'm am in denial about.
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 06:27 AM
  #144  
Jamers's Avatar
Gets Off to Weekends
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
If you're referring to 9e proposed concesssionary rates, I fail to see how that is relevant to my point. Delta pilots did not create those rates. Delta pilots latest contract didn't create those rates. Bankruptcy creates those rates.

How am I bashing the past? I hold no ill will towards regional pilots. Show me where I've put any blame on the pilots. My coming on here and defending Delta pilots is in no way "moving on and bashing the past". I also flew for a regional were pilots were paid more to fly 50 seaters then most 51+ seat operators.

And explain to me just exactly what I'm am in denial about.
Whoa.... 10,000 posts?
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 06:41 AM
  #145  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Jamers
Whoa.... 10,000 posts?
And not even close to the highest amount.
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:17 AM
  #146  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Um....what? So what you're saying is it's only Delta execs reducing service, outsourcing to the lowest bidder, & maximizing profits? Because you're wrong. They all do it. Are you saying Pinnacle cares for it's employees? Or ExpressJet, PSA, Piedmont, Us Air, Mesa, UAL, American Airlines, TranStates, Republic, or Spirit to name a few? Don't try to single Delta out, because you can't. Check out UAL's latest scope proposal. It's almost identical to DAL.

And where am I'm cheering for loss of jobs? I'm simply stating facts that pilot jobs are being shifted back to mainline. And many of the smaller communities you mention only have service because the airports are part of EAS routes. Service will not stop to those communities. It just won't be on Delta. And if it does, gripe to the government. They control it. And Delta still uses EMB120's operated by Skywest and SF340's operated by Silver Airways.

I have not forgot where I came from, or how I got to where I am. But I'm tired of seeing people point fingers at Delta pilots for Pinnacle's problems. Pinnacle is in the situation they are because of one reason, and that's Pinnacle management.
I believe the only reason mainline is taking back DCI feed is to insulate itself from the loss of feed by shutting down expensive DCI carriers like OH and possibly 9E. Once this major wage adjustment is done at the regional level, you will lose those routes again as quickly as you got them. Obama's America is a bankrupt America, only the very lean and mean companies will survive this onslaught of higher taxes and regulations. Anderson knows this, do we?
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 10:26 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BladeRunner
I believe the only reason mainline is taking back DCI feed is to insulate itself from the loss of feed by shutting down expensive DCI carriers like OH and possibly 9E. Once this major wage adjustment is done at the regional level, you will lose those routes again as quickly as you got them. Obama's America is a bankrupt America, only the very lean and mean companies will survive this onslaught of higher taxes and regulations. Anderson knows this, do we?
A few of these Delta posters have kool-aid soaked shirts they are drinking so much of it. As soon as they are done squeezing the blood out of the regionals they will go right back to the mainline employees like they did in the early 2000's. Delta might be top dog now but that won't last long.
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:17 AM
  #148  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by BladeRunner
I believe the only reason mainline is taking back DCI feed is to insulate itself from the loss of feed by shutting down expensive DCI carriers like OH and possibly 9E. Once this major wage adjustment is done at the regional level, you will lose those routes again as quickly as you got them. Obama's America is a bankrupt America, only the very lean and mean companies will survive this onslaught of higher taxes and regulations. Anderson knows this, do we?
To quote Bachman turner overdrive..."ain't seen nothing yet." Wait til we get hit with a comprehensive energy tax and jet a goes to about $10 a gallon. Ima start working now on my monorail drivers license.
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:49 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
If you're referring to 9e proposed concesssionary rates, I fail to see how that is relevant to my point. Delta pilots did not create those rates. Delta pilots latest contract didn't create those rates. Bankruptcy creates those rates.

How am I bashing the past? I hold no ill will towards regional pilots. Show me where I've put any blame on the pilots. My coming on here and defending Delta pilots is in no way "moving on and bashing the past". I also flew for a regional were pilots were paid more to fly 50 seaters then most 51+ seat operators.
And explain to me just exactly what I'm am in denial about.
I see where you got your better than everyone else attitude
Reply
Old 12-04-2012 | 11:54 AM
  #150  
CaptainCarl's Avatar
I'm a man of my word.
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
To quote Bachman turner overdrive..."ain't seen nothing yet." Wait til we get hit with a comprehensive energy tax and jet a goes to about $10 a gallon. Ima start working now on my monorail drivers license.
Maybe I Could Learn How to Be a Truck Driver from Top Gun Quotes - Hark
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Regional
30
12-22-2012 04:57 PM
SmitteyB
Regional
31
08-10-2012 05:29 PM
OKLATEX
Cargo
3
04-03-2012 03:07 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices