|
Originally Posted by gtechpilot
(Post 1333172)
SH has said this openly. The XJT MEC has openly bashed the ASA MEC in blast emails to their pilot group while the ASA MEC has refused to engage in the negative rhetoric. I prefer to trust the ASA MEC because they are behaving professionally in public.
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 1333180)
Well, they are behaving extremely unproffesionally in negotiations. Take that for what its worth.
|
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
(Post 1333191)
I'll take that the same way I do all the other lies...
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 1333208)
Why would I lie? I want this thing done asap. You are not interested in our line bidding, we are not interested in flightline. We would like to compromise. Dont like smartpref? No problem, we dont care. Please make another suggestion, we are willing to listen to anything. We are not nasty, there are no negative feelings here. We won't push our system on you and respectfully ask you dont push yours on us. We are not saying smartpref or nothing! We have proposed a number of solutions, you have been unwilling to listen to any of them! What do you propose we do? Its the same as if we were to say our line bidding or nothing. You guys would have nothing to talk to us about, right? WE WANT TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH! We want to find a compromise!
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 1332004)
This is directly caused by the ASA MEC giving management their "flight line or no merger" ultimatum. You want unity? Tell your MEC to drop their ultimatum and get on board with smartpref in order to continue back on joint negotiations.
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 1332113)
Fine by me. Just stating facts and letting the poster know who is preventing unity, the ASA MEC and their ultimatum. Like I said, go ahead and keep it up, we will all find out what the final outcome of the company negotiating dual class RJ rates. My guess is that it would end up worse for the ASA side.
No, just saying that its the ASA MEC who has turned down every single idea to get this PBS issue resolved. Only for the ASA MEC. They have literally set a flight line PBS or no merger ultimatum. They have tuned down ways to move forward because they are being intransigent, like they've been from the beginning. |
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 1333323)
Captain Tony, is that you?
|
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
(Post 1333221)
What's wrong with status quo? Your pilots prefer your line bidding to either PBS system...Why is your MEC pushing something that NEITHER pilot group wants?
Time to pull your heads out of the sand and get informed. |
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 1333357)
Wow JoeMerchant why didn't we think of that? BECAUSE WE DID!!!!!! AND THE ASA MEC SAID "NO." We called it dual track where everyone took a different bidding system.
Time to pull your heads out of the sand and get informed. Hate to break this to you. The ASA side proposed the dual track but wanted to stay separate MEC's until whichever system was ratified by the pilots. Your side said no to that. Why? |
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
(Post 1333189)
gtech....As you know, I support the position of our MEC, but I and others are growing tired of the "behaving professionally in public" while the XJT MEC attacks in blast emails and on the message boards.....Our MEC is losing the public battle that is going on by not attacking back...Take that back to the MEC before it is too late....
|
Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
(Post 1333364)
Hate to break this to you. The ASA side proposed the dual track but wanted to stay separate MEC's until whichever system was ratified by the pilots. Your side said no to that. Why?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands