Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Holding ASA and XJT MEC's accountable >

Holding ASA and XJT MEC's accountable

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Holding ASA and XJT MEC's accountable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2013 | 01:03 PM
  #21  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
Default

Term limits, required line currency, and greater transparency (pay, expenditures) would be nice. I'd like to see some of PA's (ATL captain rep) ideas implemented, but I have no idea what the process is like.
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 05:23 AM
  #22  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoHandHold
I agree whole heartedly...I seek to end divisive rhetoric....Captain Tony needs to pipe down.
Oh yeah... I'm the problem here... scapegoat much?
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 05:27 AM
  #23  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Good Rate
Tony...That's not a real solution. There are great benefits of a successful merger for both pilot groups and the company as well. It would be silly for us to not work toward one pilot group.

One problem is that the MECs become detached from the pilot groups. The negotiations quickly turn to ****ing match with the only interest is winning the battle and the desires of the pilot group falls by the wayside.

Maybe another option could be to increase the number of members of negotiating group. Why do we have a such a small group representing such a large number of pilots. More members could equal a more fair representation of the pilot group. Then a 2/3 majority wins the issue and we move on

Just trying to think of solutions....
Really? What possible solution exists now that we would have no choice but to take concessions in order to obtain a JCBA? The XJT MEC took all of those non pay issues to the arbitrator just to undermine our negotiating position. You are right in that they just want to "win". Both MECs are no different than the idiots in Congress. But now that the company is holding an award for a CRJ-900 rate $2-$10 less, dual qual, and non seat based pay, do you think they're going to turn around and say "just kidding!"? We either accept that deal, or the company keeps us separate and slowly shuts down the ASA side. I prefer the latter.
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 05:30 AM
  #24  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
In all fairness, mgmt also said Flightline as it stands currently is never going to be in a JCBA.
Give it a rest Joe. You're like the college freshman who still attends the high school prom just because he can't let go.

And what you said isn't even really true. Management had previously said they hated vacation low, but other than that, didn't care what PBS system we used as long as it fit the cost parameters. Then McK showed Courtney H how much money SmartPref could save her by constraining the line values, and the company was sold. Another hand grenade he lobbed into these "negotiations".
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 08:45 AM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
Term limits, required line currency, and greater transparency (pay, expenditures) would be nice. I'd like to see some of PA's (ATL captain rep) ideas implemented, but I have no idea what the process is like.
I like this. Required line currency would maybe keep the office guys a little more grounded, and in touch with what we deal with on a daily basis.

Greater transparency on expenditures would also be nice. It would really be interesting to see where some of our 2% goes. I know we have a right to see for ourselves where this money is going. There is actually a group of Amereican Eagle pilots auditing their own union reps, and finding some interesting things. I think this needs to be done here also. It's our money, we have every right to see how it's being spent.

All in all this stuff takes time and know how. Like you I have no idea what the process is like, which is part of the problem.
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 09:28 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Good Rate
Tony...That's not a real solution. There are great benefits of a successful merger for both pilot groups and the company as well. It would be silly for us to not work toward one pilot group.

One problem is that the MECs become detached from the pilot groups. The negotiations quickly turn to ****ing match with the only interest is winning the battle and the desires of the pilot group falls by the wayside.

Maybe another option could be to increase the number of members of negotiating group. Why do we have a such a small group representing such a large number of pilots. More members could equal a more fair representation of the pilot group. Then a 2/3 majority wins the issue and we move on

Just trying to think of solutions....
Really? What possible solution exists now that we would have no choice but to take concessions in order to obtain a JCBA? The XJT MEC took all of those non pay issues to the arbitrator just to undermine our negotiating position. You are right in that they just want to "win". Both MECs are no different than the idiots in Congress. But now that the company is holding an award for a CRJ-900 rate $2-$10 less, dual qual, and non seat based pay, do you think they're going to turn around and say "just kidding!"? We either accept that deal, or the company keeps us separate and slowly shuts down the ASA side. I prefer the latter.
It's not $2-10 less. Yes, the rate may be but total compensation is not.
Reply
Old 03-29-2013 | 11:32 AM
  #27  
ross9238's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Grounded
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Yes, the rate may be but total compensation is not.
This would be fine IF we would be able to keep the compensation that XJT group has right now. Now I don't claim to know even 1% of what you or Tony know but we all know that management will drive to lower the compensation that XJT has in their contract for our new one. So ultimately, this is all moot till we know the final language in our JCBA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redundant Guy
Regional
201
01-28-2013 07:06 AM
PeezDog
Regional
36
09-21-2011 08:33 AM
newarkblows
Regional
265
08-12-2010 12:21 PM
dontsurf
Regional
75
06-02-2008 07:06 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices