Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
And the Winner is... SKW... (gets Ejets) >

And the Winner is... SKW... (gets Ejets)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

And the Winner is... SKW... (gets Ejets)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2013 | 06:21 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Redbird611
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
WRONG Management does not fear a union here i.e. expressjet. What they fear is not being able pay shareholders. Mangament tries to ride a fine line between paying people just enough to keep them happy so they'll be productive and produce profit. They do not want to cut so deep that it causes employees to become destructive and unprofitable. Last time I checked the definition of negotiate didnt included the word union in it.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 06:50 AM
  #62  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip
While the holding company was, it was still a start up certificate with zero experience.
But it was set up in-house, by people who were currently running an airline, using many of the same assets (including pilots). I'm certainly no fan of gojets but from United's perspective they were not a very risky proposition as far as certification.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 07:12 AM
  #63  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
I do feel that ALPA abuses spending for food and alcohol, but I also feel that it should be a perk for those that do volunteer. But you're right, Ruth Chris Steakhouse is a bit excessive.
I tend to agree. The issue is not so much much the food and drink or even the venue, it's the fact that they broke the rules, tried to hide it, and now seem to be sweeping it under the rug instead of taking the appropriate action: resignation.

If they need nice dinners, change the rules to allow it once a quarter or once a year, whatever your group feels like ponying up for.

Originally Posted by gojo
Additionally, I feel that many of the contract provisions that Skywest enjoys comes from ALPA negotiated contracts.
Probably true to a certain point, but for the most part regional compensation is so low compared to the general economy that regionals can't really treat people much worse or they'd just quit...except for those who have a lot of time vested. The only people who really benefit from regional unions are very high-seniority CA's in the six-figure range...I agree without union protection these guys would not be making that kind of money.

Originally Posted by gojo
I suspect that Skywest management will go for concessions at Skywest if ASA/XJT gives in to concessions
That would make sense.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 07:49 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
Your peers voted for it.
Fact is that the contract scope was originally cut at 70 seats during the negotiations. Once DALAPA agreed to and voted in their large allotment of 76 seat(for the 717's) Puchela and the NMB agreed with UAL mgmt that this is the new line. UAL ALPA's choice was accept or no contract movement.

Blame, IMHO, goes to 1) DALPA and, mostly, ALPA National for not having a coordinated plan with UAL ALPA, et al, to keep scope under 70. and, 2) the RLA for allowing companies to be able to stall negotiations to infinity.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 07:51 AM
  #65  
soon2bfo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat... Forever
Default

Originally Posted by Redbird611
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
Got a good laugh out of that one.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 07:57 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
That's right because you guys managed to get a whopping $2.00 an hour more for A/C over 50 seats...
Again it was an arbitrated award, we weren't able to come to terms. While we're at it, assuming you work for Skywest did you not fly the 200 for the same rate as the 700 when they were announced? Get back to us please we're all anxious. At least we get the opportunity to go to arbitration just like SAPA! Oh wait......
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 08:17 AM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
You only need to be cheaper than XJT. If you just hold the line and keep what you have, should be no problem.
That's right because you guys managed to get a whopping $2.00 an hour more for A/C over 50 seats...

It is a lot more than just rates. Tell me you understand that, right? How much more in 401k matching funds do you get? How much more in B fund contributions do you get? How much more in vacation accrual do you get? How much more in sick accrual do you get? How much lower is your share of health care premiums? How much more in perdiem do you get? Etc etc.

Really, if you just keep what you already have, your pilot group will continue to be more "cost competitive" than LXJT's.

Originally Posted by eaglepilot6
Really!?!? Only 1 guy gets it? This is only an announcement for 40/100. Plus, they have options for 100. Anyone who doesn't think these will be used as management "carrots" to lure ALL SKYW, Inc pilots into accepting concessions is either ignorant, naive, or has zero memory. Wasn't ASA getting the first 900s, anyone? anyone? The email has already come out with management basically saying no growth at ASA or XJT unless concessions. I'm sorry, I mean "cost competitiveness". Plus, the threat of aircraft exiting the CPAs starting this fall. Deja vu all over again I guess.
The email that came out to XJT was a plea for unity to get labor contracts done so the company can know its costs going forward to bid contracts. I can't speak for the other labor groups, but for XJT pilots, the contract is basically done except for PBS bidding system. Management hasnt been asking for concessions, they have been on the sidelines for months watching the MECs cat fight over Flightline vs SmartPref
Don't be so naive. They are too smart to outright ask for concessions. They have been using code words like "cost competitive" to get the subtle message accords. BH himself said to me on a conference that there are things in the LXJT contract that are not cost competitive. Maybe it won't be a concession for the ASA people but I'm definitely not holding my breath for the LXJT side.

Originally Posted by gojo
I do feel that ALPA abuses spending for food and alcohol, but I also feel that it should be a perk for those that do volunteer. But you're right, Ruth Chris Steakhouse is a bit excessive. Additionally, I feel that many of the contract provisions that Skywest enjoys comes from ALPA negotiated contracts. I suspect that Skywest management will go for concessions at Skywest if ASA/XJT gives in to concessions
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
They do have the document from their last "negotiations" that says they will get whatever 401k matching, health benefits, and scope that XJT pilots negotiate in their contract.

Originally Posted by Redbird611
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
WRONG Management does not fear a union here i.e. expressjet. What they fear is not being able pay shareholders. Mangament tries to ride a fine line between paying people just enough to keep them happy so they'll be productive and produce profit. They do not want to cut so deep that it causes employees to become destructive and unprofitable. Last time I checked the definition of negotiate didnt included the word union in it.
No, but without an NMB recognized union, you don't have any leverage. Like you said, it only has to do with management compensating enough to keep you non-union. They fear that that would threaten the value to the shareholders. I guess SWA does very bad since ALL of their employees are unionized.

Probably true to a certain point, but for the most part regional compensation is so low compared to the general economy that regionals can't really treat people much worse or they'd just quit...except for those who have a lot of time vested. The only people who really benefit from regional unions are very high-seniority CA's in the six-figure range...I agree without union protection these guys would not be making that kind of money.
Why does everyone think that having a union is solely about having a contract?

Last edited by Nevets; 05-22-2013 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 10:14 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Nevets save your drivel for your dog hes the only one thats listens to you. Why? Because he has no choice! You glow with ignorance when you compare SWA to OO in terms of a union. Leverage? Hows that levearge working for Pinnacle? Oh yeah it didnt they took it up the poop shoot with no say what so ever.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 10:19 AM
  #69  
SeaRider's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 5
From: Guppy gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
No, but without an NMB recognized union, you don't have any leverage.
Trust me...having NMB recognition really doesn't mean squat.
Reply
Old 05-22-2013 | 10:25 AM
  #70  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
BH himself said to me on a conference that there are things in the LXJT contract that are not cost competitive.
Gotta hand it to you, that was pretty sweet to hear you ask those direct, straight forward, thought out questions of him. And it was comical to listen to him dance around it all. Not like we should expect anything more though.

"just because we don't always get it right doesn't mean we aren't trying........"
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices