United EJet Order?
06-15-2013 | 09:03 AM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
06-15-2013 | 09:58 AM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: 21°00'18.5"N 156°39'00.0"W
I know it's already been said here, but it seems the FAA sequester has eliminated any chance California Pacific will get E175's for UAL. Just found this article...
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
06-15-2013 | 10:58 AM
#64
Line Holder
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: The Parlor
I know it's already been said here, but it seems the FAA sequester has eliminated any chance California Pacific will get E175's for UAL. Just found this article...
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
06-15-2013 | 11:20 AM
#65
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
I know it's already been said here, but it seems the FAA sequester has eliminated any chance California Pacific will get E175's for UAL. Just found this article...
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
FAA: Can't Process New CA Airline Application Due to Sequester - Really? :: Fox&Hounds
Also heard yesterday that the sequester is affecting the issuance of certificates for new training programs. Anyone else heard of this? Apparently, the FAA does not have the manpower to oversee the development of new training programs at any airlines currently. If this is true, then any carriers not currently operating the E175 would be eliminated.
06-15-2013 | 11:33 AM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: 21°00'18.5"N 156°39'00.0"W
I'm 100% sure OO has done their homework...but at some point, don't they have to do proving runs? Has their E175 training program already been certified? Or did they just add the E175 type to their operating cert?
06-15-2013 | 11:45 AM
#67
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Right now finishing up a training syllabus, they've already selected check airmen for the program and will be sending them to Flight Safety after the busy summer schedule. 1st 175 is due in May-June2014.
06-15-2013 | 01:13 PM
#68
Gets Summer Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
I can find nothing in our OpSpecs or on the FAA website that would indicate our 175 program has been approved and added to our certificate. I'm assuming, though, that these sources are actually current.
That said, the sequester isn't going to stop this at SkyWest, even if the company has to pay the inspectors' salaries themselves. Too much is on the line at this point.
That said, the sequester isn't going to stop this at SkyWest, even if the company has to pay the inspectors' salaries themselves. Too much is on the line at this point.
06-15-2013 | 02:46 PM
#69
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
I can find nothing in our OpSpecs or on the FAA website that would indicate our 175 program has been approved and added to our certificate. I'm assuming, though, that these sources are actually current.
That said, the sequester isn't going to stop this at SkyWest, even if the company has to pay the inspectors' salaries themselves. Too much is on the line at this point.
That said, the sequester isn't going to stop this at SkyWest, even if the company has to pay the inspectors' salaries themselves. Too much is on the line at this point.
I'm sorry I wasn't clearer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
