UAL Cleveland RJ KABOSH
02-02-2014 | 08:00 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,217
Likes: 273
At least 9 of the the 34 are XJT 135, the other 25 145 are CHQ I believe
02-02-2014 | 08:52 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
They have wanted to dump CLE for years. The rhetoric about the new regulations is their way of sending a message to Congress... read the words. They are not saying there are no pilots, they said the "pool of available pilots" so this is the second round of management trying to get the 1500 hr rule reduced to the level of pilots who are "available." They lost the first round to the 3407 families.
Kind of crazy though, how under the new system a 1500 hour pilot with 2 or 3 DUI apparently contributes more to increasing safety than a 500 hour pilot with a clean record. But, hey, I only work here.
Kind of crazy though, how under the new system a 1500 hour pilot with 2 or 3 DUI apparently contributes more to increasing safety than a 500 hour pilot with a clean record. But, hey, I only work here.
02-02-2014 | 09:04 AM
#14
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 274
From: B737CA
Why would they need to be problem people? For some of us, those were competitive mins to get into regionals. Nothing wrong with spending some time CFI-ing and then flying for places like Ameriflight or Airnet before getting into regionals.
02-02-2014 | 09:14 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
I'm not sure CHQ has 25 E145's flying for United. The info I found is between 13 and 16 aircraft for UAX. So it might be our 135's and maybe some 145's that might come off that stack of 22 a year early? Or TSA? They have 28 flying for UAX.
All I know is, it will probably be quite a relief to maybe be properly staffed for once.
All I know is, it will probably be quite a relief to maybe be properly staffed for once.
02-02-2014 | 09:19 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Left seat of a Jet
The plan from jumpstreet was to protect the legacy interests in which are big cities and international destinations! everyone else is thrown under the bus!
02-02-2014 | 09:36 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Grounded
I don't think us voting down the TA had anything to do with this. This was going to happen regardless and I am pretty sure our management was well aware of this. As far as the airframes, I believe you might see more come out of the XJT side than any other carrier. Either way it is what it is and something that is out of our realm of control. Hopefully there will be a new order of aircraft for mainline so a lot of us can get the heck out.
02-02-2014 | 11:54 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,217
Likes: 273
I'm not sure CHQ has 25 E145's flying for United. The info I found is between 13 and 16 aircraft for UAX. So it might be our 135's and maybe some 145's that might come off that stack of 22 a year early? Or TSA? They have 28 flying for UAX.
All I know is, it will probably be quite a relief to maybe be properly staffed for once.
All I know is, it will probably be quite a relief to maybe be properly staffed for once.
CRJ side, which is the "well staffed" side, has started a vacation buyback program for March.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM
