Are Pilots Idiots?
02-28-2014 | 12:55 AM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
You can say you still see a comparison but that doesn't mean it's there. Of course there is a drastic difference between a WB Captain and a regional pilot but that has nothing to do with what I was attempting to convey. My message was simply about getting paid for duty hours versus flight hours. I'm going to try one more time and then chalk it up to the blinders you have on regarding the bad pay situation.
I used the WB Captain pay as the extreme in order to make my point. Which was that looking at our current monthly pay as it stands today, NO pilot would get their current hourly pay rate if we were paid for all our hours on duty instead of our flight hours. I could have attempted to make my point in my first post by typing:
"If we got paid for every hour we were actually on duty, do you really think a first year FO at a regional airline would make $20 an hour?"
But I don't think that would have been as effective since I was attempting to point out that ALL our hourly pay rates are inflated, especially the ones at the top(which is WHY I used that example). That's because we're getting paid on ~80-ish (give or take) flight/credit hours each month rather than the ~300-ish we spend away from base or the ~150-ish we spend on duty.
I think you're fixating on the fact that an RJ F/O probably SHOULD be getting his current pay rate for every hour he is on duty in order to make his compensation something close to reasonable - while you couldn't say the same thing about the WB Captain.
Clear as mud? Either way, I'm done. Cheers.
I used the WB Captain pay as the extreme in order to make my point. Which was that looking at our current monthly pay as it stands today, NO pilot would get their current hourly pay rate if we were paid for all our hours on duty instead of our flight hours. I could have attempted to make my point in my first post by typing:
"If we got paid for every hour we were actually on duty, do you really think a first year FO at a regional airline would make $20 an hour?"
But I don't think that would have been as effective since I was attempting to point out that ALL our hourly pay rates are inflated, especially the ones at the top(which is WHY I used that example). That's because we're getting paid on ~80-ish (give or take) flight/credit hours each month rather than the ~300-ish we spend away from base or the ~150-ish we spend on duty.
I think you're fixating on the fact that an RJ F/O probably SHOULD be getting his current pay rate for every hour he is on duty in order to make his compensation something close to reasonable - while you couldn't say the same thing about the WB Captain.
Clear as mud? Either way, I'm done. Cheers.
Why is it such an "outlandish" thought that we should get current pay rates or better for every hour we're on duty, or at least something close to that? My brother is an attorney and makes $450.00 for every single hour he works, whether he's home or out of town. His law firm even bills for all phone calls, etc. at that rate. Let's not always be the first to "sell ourselves short"!
02-28-2014 | 01:40 AM
#53
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
The pay scales are set up to maximize the amount you used to get from the defined benefit pension program. It seems it's now every man for himself fighting to get back what was promised.
Pension funds are the most destructive force in the universe.
Pension funds are the most destructive force in the universe.
02-28-2014 | 07:05 AM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 40
From: 767 Captain
Why is it such an "outlandish" thought that we should get current pay rates or better for every hour we're on duty, or at least something close to that? My brother is an attorney and makes $450.00 for every single hour he works, whether he's home or out of town. His law firm even bills for all phone calls, etc. at that rate. Let's not always be the first to "sell ourselves short"!
As far as your brother...... Wow. So, in a 40 hour work week he makes $18,000. 60 hours (since most lawyers work long hours) gets him $27,000 a week. 900K to 1.3 million a year. Pretty good, I'd say.
Since I don't know your brother, I'll have to take your word. However, you also mention his law firm BILLS at that rate (which sounds about right). You appear to be confusing the firm's billable rate (what they charge clients) and what they pay their lawyers. Most lawyers are on salary. The firm bills clients, say $450 for each hour the lawyer works on their case. The firm then pays the lawyer's salary (along with operating expense, etc) out of the billing revenue. Typically, the lawyer's salary is 25%-30% of the annual revenue they generate for the firm.
Lawyers, especially in large firms, have an expected annual goal of hours billed to clients. Usually in the ball park of 2,000 hours per year. In order to actually bill that many hours (and still be human - eat meals, take breaks, etc.) the lawyers are usually working at least 50 hours a week and some nights/weekends (so maybe 60/week total). That's 3000 hours of work per year. At a salary of $200,000 per year, they're getting paid ~$67 per hour. $300K per year, $100/hour.
So, it sounds like your brother has got himself a seriously good thing, well outside the norm for most lawyers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/op...hour.html?_r=0
02-28-2014 | 07:21 AM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Adlerdriver,
My niece is a LA lawyer, previously in Manhattan, and your comments are right on track. They usually work horrendous hours for that kind of money. No airline pilot would consider it.
GF
My niece is a LA lawyer, previously in Manhattan, and your comments are right on track. They usually work horrendous hours for that kind of money. No airline pilot would consider it.
GF
02-28-2014 | 01:08 PM
#58
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: E170 CA
We are about to vote on a TA...quitting would not be doing the profession much good now, would it? I want to participate in changing the industry. The regionals are hurting so much for pilots now that we have more leverage than we've ever had before. Yes some have voted for new bad contracts, but even if mainline cuts flying from those with decent contracts and gives it to those with the bad, how are they going to staff it?
02-28-2014 | 02:47 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Bye
You can say you still see a comparison but that doesn't mean it's there. Of course there is a drastic difference between a WB Captain and a regional pilot but that has nothing to do with what I was attempting to convey. My message was simply about getting paid for duty hours versus flight hours. I'm going to try one more time and then chalk it up to the blinders you have on regarding the bad pay situation.
I used the WB Captain pay as the extreme in order to make my point. Which was that looking at our current monthly pay as it stands today, NO pilot would get their current hourly pay rate if we were paid for all our hours on duty instead of our flight hours. I could have attempted to make my point in my first post by typing:
"If we got paid for every hour we were actually on duty, do you really think a first year FO at a regional airline would make $20 an hour?"
But I don't think that would have been as effective since I was attempting to point out that ALL our hourly pay rates are inflated, especially the ones at the top(which is WHY I used that example). That's because we're getting paid on ~80-ish (give or take) flight/credit hours each month rather than the ~300-ish we spend away from base or the ~150-ish we spend on duty.
I think you're fixating on the fact that an RJ F/O probably SHOULD be getting his current pay rate for every hour he is on duty in order to make his compensation something close to reasonable - while you couldn't say the same thing about the WB Captain.
Clear as mud? Either way, I'm done. Cheers.
I used the WB Captain pay as the extreme in order to make my point. Which was that looking at our current monthly pay as it stands today, NO pilot would get their current hourly pay rate if we were paid for all our hours on duty instead of our flight hours. I could have attempted to make my point in my first post by typing:
"If we got paid for every hour we were actually on duty, do you really think a first year FO at a regional airline would make $20 an hour?"
But I don't think that would have been as effective since I was attempting to point out that ALL our hourly pay rates are inflated, especially the ones at the top(which is WHY I used that example). That's because we're getting paid on ~80-ish (give or take) flight/credit hours each month rather than the ~300-ish we spend away from base or the ~150-ish we spend on duty.
I think you're fixating on the fact that an RJ F/O probably SHOULD be getting his current pay rate for every hour he is on duty in order to make his compensation something close to reasonable - while you couldn't say the same thing about the WB Captain.
Clear as mud? Either way, I'm done. Cheers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
