Regional Upgrade times
04-13-2014, 06:17 PM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Originally Posted by pagey
Why exactly do you think that is the case?
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
However this bubble will stop soon as the greedy suckers are not a huge pool, and the fear of a missed bubble becomes a clearer reality. ITS a scheme with a huge risk due to the awful fo pay, that's why it won't work. The second the fast upgrade becomes questions the house of cards falls.
04-13-2014, 06:22 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by pagey
Why exactly do you think that is the case?
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
However this bubble will stop soon as the greedy suckers are not a huge pool, and the fear of a missed bubble becomes a clearer reality. ITS a scheme with a huge risk due to the awful fo pay, that's why it won't work. The second the fast upgrade becomes questions the house of cards falls.
Most of them where around 1,000 to 1200 TT. Once they get hire, there will be a couple of months with super low hiring and high attrition.
04-13-2014, 06:43 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
That, and the latest new hires are the ones that where stuck when the regionals increased the TT.
Most of them where around 1,000 to 1200 TT. Once they get hire, there will be a couple of months with super low hiring and high attrition.
Most of them where around 1,000 to 1200 TT. Once they get hire, there will be a couple of months with super low hiring and high attrition.
By this theory the "super low hiring and high attrition" would've already happened. There's no gap AFTER those 1k-1.2k guys, it would've been before. Which also makes no sense.
04-13-2014, 06:59 PM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Originally Posted by rickt86
For the reason your on here cheerleading new hires. You know without them you and everyone running there is screwed. You literally can't afford 7 years in the right seat on that awful contract. It's the night mare Mesa guys lived.
However this bubble will stop soon as the greedy suckers are not a huge pool, and the fear of a missed bubble becomes a clearer reality. ITS a scheme with a huge risk due to the awful fo pay, that's why it won't work. The second the fast upgrade becomes questions the house of cards falls.
However this bubble will stop soon as the greedy suckers are not a huge pool, and the fear of a missed bubble becomes a clearer reality. ITS a scheme with a huge risk due to the awful fo pay, that's why it won't work. The second the fast upgrade becomes questions the house of cards falls.
04-13-2014, 09:35 PM
#38
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: CA
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by pagey
FO pay with the TA at the year 4 cap will be the same as it was at the 7 year cap that everyone congratulated us on a year ago this month due to contract language.
04-14-2014, 04:08 AM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by pagey
Why exactly do you think that is the case?
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
To be fair, it never started. The most junior CA is a 2009 hire.
What are the guarantees that the 200’s are staying?
Republic and Mesa had to shut down part of their 50 seat flying to ease the growing pains, you think PSA won’t need to?
Assuming the American E-jets are to be announced this year, will that inhibit recruiting & upgrades at PSA? It would seem PSA is currently also benefiting from uncertainty at other carriers which won’t be there forever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
