Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future? >

Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future?

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Majors To Absorb Regionals In The Future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2014, 03:23 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,277
Default

Originally Posted by DOGIII View Post
Why would they be forced back to FO? They could choose to stay in status and base on the rj. I cannot imagine many senior pilots would bid down to the rj and force these captains to an FO position of any kind on a different bird and even if they did- there would be plenty of junior rj captains leaving to the right seat of the bigger planes which would practically level the bid.
I think people are stuck in a "flow" mentality here. The hypothetical proposition I am offering for debate in this thread is neither a flow nor a traditional staple to the bottom of a list- it is folding in the entire carrier (pilots, fleets, bases and lines etc.) to the major airlines ranks, generally keeping the operation intact.
Once you fold that flying into the major you have to be able to do it with costs in line with the rest of the industry. If not the flying goes away and quickly.
If a major wants to control all flying it would be cheaper and with dramatically fewer ancillary issues to simply stop renewing feed contracts and ad the flying to the mainline. There is no need for the night mare ever merger seems to become.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 03:23 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DOGIII's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: and Hold
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Quote:





Originally Posted by Navmode


What I believe will happen:

Some mainline carrier will find their most profitable contract carrier, buy them out, and staple everyone to the bottom of the seniority list. No more scope to worry about limiting seat capacity, and they would be able to take advantage of the cheaper regional flying at cost. It's basically a flow without the shenanigans and technical red tape.

I can see many people at X carrier accepting a status quo contract renewal if they had a mainline seniority number, and were just waiting to move into a 737/a320 or what have you at normal mainline pay rates. Pilots would come out of the woodwork for an opportunity like that, and every class would be full. The first mainline carrier to do such a thing would not only have the pick of the litter, but would set the tone for the way the industry will look for the foreseeable future.




Past history shows the purchased carrier would not agree to a staple. Most managements are also unlikely to give up all control of the hiring process.
Unless this process starts with the wholly owned carriers - the management teams their hardly have a say in what control they give up...
DOGIII is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 04:49 AM
  #23  
doin time
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 435
Default

1. The trend has been to spin off regional partners.
2. An independent publicly owned regional would have to agree to be bought out or be taken over under hostility.
3. A privately owned regional would have to see gold at the end of the rainbow to give up it's cash cow.
4. Unionized pilots would pitch a fit. Who knows what the other labour groups would say.
5. I really can't see upper mgmt at these regionals giving up their gigs.
6. Stranger things have happened..
slammer1906 is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:01 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DOGIII's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: and Hold
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by slammer1906 View Post
1. The trend has been to spin off regional partners.
2. An independent publicly owned regional would have to agree to be bought out or be taken over under hostility.
3. A privately owned regional would have to see gold at the end of the rainbow to give up it's cash cow.
4. Unionized pilots would pitch a fit. Who knows what the other labour groups would say.
5. I really can't see upper mgmt at these regionals giving up their gigs.
6. Stranger things have happened..
I think you raise valid points regarding contract carriers- but I am trying to establish if this could be done with wholly owned regionals. How would the contract carriers compete for applicants if they are flocking to these absorbed regionals?
There could be some backlash from the unions as you say , but let's think why... Would union pilots handed a seniority number, accruing seniority, longevity and mainline benefits complain?
DOGIII is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:17 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by DOGIII View Post
Why can't they both keep their cheap outsourced flying and give everyone seniority numbers. They would have plenty of applicants at the door that would gladly fly RJ's at low rates keeping the feed staffed and all these guys can bid to fly the larger aircrafts when their seniority can hold it...
How else would mainlines hold any pilots at these express units with the amount of movement that could be around the corner?
Because the majority of mainline pilots think regional pilots are a bunch of misfits with DUIs, no degrees, checkride failures, and no service to their country. They feel regional pilots are not properly vetted, and if they want to be Mainline Pilots they need to go through the interview process and earn it. Like they did.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:20 AM
  #26  
doin time
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 435
Default

Would unions complain? Maybe, maybe not. The pilot group would have to vote on the issue.
We're starting to see a trend of pilots flocking to regionals with descent work rules. If the wholly owned regional, which only four exist, have a sub standard contract, they'll have a hard time attracting quality pilots anyway.
PSA just voted in a low quality contract. Endeavor has a low quality contract. Envoy will more than likely shrink. Piedmont is kinda a toss up at the moment. Those being the only wholly owned, it may be hard to sell to the savvy new hire.
slammer1906 is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:21 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13 View Post
Senior captains at the regionals would fight that as hard as they possibly could. There would probably also be lawsuits involved. Can you imagine a bunch of 30 year RJ captains who live in base and fly nothing but high credit locals and CDOs being stapled to the bottom of a major list, going back to FO and being forced to commute to reserve in NYC?

There are quite a few people at most regionals who have no plans to leave the regionals and would pitch a fit over any kind of absorption that they wouldn't have the right to pass up.
Not that I think any of this will happen, but the scenario you envision wouldn't be the case because there would be a two way fence. Maybe for 10 years or more, that would prevent the bump/flush. Everyone would keep their current position, the pay check would just come from somewhere else.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:21 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,204
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
This is coming soon, by the end of the year. The big three need pilots for their brand. There is a need currently but in 3-4 years without a steady source of pilots these airlines will be in a world of hurt. The first airline to innovate and make a move will be way ahead of the game. We are all focused on the shorterm, this is not a short term move, it is a move to capture the required manpower over the next 5 years and bring in the next generation of pilots. The smart airlines looking into the future are already actively working on this and recruiting from the flight schools trying to secure pilots for their brand. Regionals will eventually be the entry job for the mainline brands. This will allow a select few regionals to properly staff and provide for a more defined career path which will allow for more financing options for potential pilot candidates.
Doubt it UA was looking into a "flow" program until they realized they had 5000 apps on file.. The majors will never have a problem with so call "mythical" shortage...
amcnd is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:27 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
Doubt it UA was looking into a "flow" program until they realized they had 5000 apps on file.. The majors will never have a problem with so call "mythical" shortage...
This. There is no pilot shortage. There are regional airlines that can't get people to invest $100K for a $22K job.

The legacy carriers will never have a shortage of applicants. There will always be plenty of well connected regional pilots, and retiring military pilots to fill those spots.

But if they do, they will simply go to ab-initio training like all the other major carriers of the world. Most current regional pilots need to start accepting that they will never get that coveted mainline job.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 05-04-2014, 05:31 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
DOGIII's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: and Hold
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post

Doubt it UA was looking into a "flow" program until they realized they had 5000 apps on file.. The majors will never have a problem with so call "mythical" shortage...
I agree that the majors will likely never face a real shortage, but their express feed will and they will have to find a way to defend it.
DOGIII is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
guido15
Regional
60
02-16-2012 08:03 PM
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
Flyby1206
Major
9
06-17-2009 10:23 AM
sigep_nm
Regional
52
02-22-2007 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices