Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training >

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2014, 12:36 PM
  #201  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Std Deviation View Post
Conveniently missing is who is going to pay for the $100,000-150,000 program.
Probably, a number of training events come free with aircraft purchase.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 01:01 PM
  #202  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 432
Default

In other countries is this the only way one can get into an airliner? By getting a MPL license?
Beech90 is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 01:12 PM
  #203  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bedrock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: ERJ, CA
Posts: 718
Default

Originally Posted by Beech90 View Post
In other countries is this the only way one can get into an airliner? By getting a MPL license?
I think it has pretty much become the std. 250 hour commercial license followed by sim time and a lot of ground school. Other countries don't have extensive GA and 135 operations (we don't have them anymore either!), so this is what ICAO have come up. AirBus also was way ahead of this by designing airplanes made to be flown by low time pilots.
bedrock is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 01:19 PM
  #204  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,941
Default

Interesting. Boeing wants other countries to issue ATP certificates with less hours than the US issues commercial certificates.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 04:06 PM
  #205  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
As pointed out, ATP/Higher Power say their program will cost $4999 and they're making a profit on that figure. And if you think an airline spends 100k training a new hire you need to come down to earth.
oh yeah ok. 20k for the type. but i gurantee you there is more than that being put into you from sim time paying the check airman to do the ioe. its not a clean cut figure that its just 20k. probably not 100k either. the short answer is it aint cheap
ClarenceOver is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 04:07 PM
  #206  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Default

Flying Daddy's airplane is very cost effective.


well aware of that fact. at least all the money i make as a pilot will be all profit instead of paying off debt. ^^
ClarenceOver is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 05:25 PM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by Beech90 View Post
In other countries is this the only way one can get into an airliner? By getting a MPL license?
In other countries where MPL is employed, it is the exception, not the rule. The MPL pilot's skill level is supposedly on par with a CPL license holder who also did a type rating on FAR/CS25 aircraft, but a lot less time in airplanes and much more time in simulators. MPL holders cannot exercise single engine or multi engine privileges (outside of their type rating). MPL holders are restricted to flying aircraft for one certificate holder and can't switch companies until they have gained an ATPL. Lufthansa found this to be a limitation since they operate multiple certificates and had no flexibility to put their MPL pilots in other certificates and reverted back to the CPL path.
zondaracer is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 07:19 PM
  #208  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
I don't buy lotto tickets either.


ROTC is fine. Actually AFROTC worked out great for a couple friends in the 80s when the AF gave out too many full rides. At graduation, they were given the option of NOT going active because there were too many officers already.

Or there is the enlisted route. With Tuition Assistance, good planning, and persistence in a six year hitch a guy could get out with a BS for next to nothing...... And after getting out, the GI Bill could cover about half of his flight training at a less expensive 141 school. An 18yo kid could get out at 24 with a degree, Comm ASEL/AMEL, and CFI with zero debt if he saved a few bucks while on duty and had a part time job during flight school. Instruct for a year, fly a Caravan or Navajo for a year, move up to a King Air (preferably with glass), and then a Brasilia. Now he is about 28, zero debt, great experience, and can be pretty picky about where he goes next: corporate, charter, fractional, regional, or (if he really works the job fairs, etc) maybe even mainline.

But it takes work, planning, and sacrifice.

Or just get a bunch of loans and be in debt forever because it is easier.

Disclosure: that enlisted route was almost exactly the one I took. CFIIs were more in demand and I took a signature loan of $2000 (about 20 hours of Instructor pay) to finish up. Loan was paid well before I quit instructing, and I haven't eaten ramen since
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 07:21 PM
  #209  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
Probably, a number of training events come free with aircraft purchase.
What do you mean?

While its true that airliners come with some training events by the manufacturer, that would have zero bearing on entry level student pilots. New planes under warranty don't create a supply of new mechanics either.
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-30-2014, 08:37 PM
  #210  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 324
Default Extensive?

Originally Posted by bedrock View Post
I think it has pretty much become the std. 250 hour commercial license followed by sim time and a lot of ground school. Other countries don't have extensive GA and 135 operations (we don't have them anymore either!), so this is what ICAO have come up. AirBus also was way ahead of this by designing airplanes made to be flown by low time pilots.

The 135 market is the USA is not as extensive as many poeple seem to think. GA is used for training, and don't expect people to be able to gain their 1500 through either of these routes any more.

MPL programs typically still require time in GA aircraft, just less of it and more focus on sims and situational training that pilots would not get in a GA environment. Complexity being 1 important aspect.
outaluckagain is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MetalGear
Technical
8
01-24-2013 08:08 PM
jumppilot
Safety
27
07-18-2012 08:32 AM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
Todzilla
Cargo
34
06-30-2009 11:29 AM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices