Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training >

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training

Old 07-30-2014 | 07:21 PM
  #211  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 166
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Probably, a number of training events come free with aircraft purchase.
What do you mean?

While its true that airliners come with some training events by the manufacturer, that would have zero bearing on entry level student pilots. New planes under warranty don't create a supply of new mechanics either.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 08:37 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Default Extensive?

Originally Posted by bedrock
I think it has pretty much become the std. 250 hour commercial license followed by sim time and a lot of ground school. Other countries don't have extensive GA and 135 operations (we don't have them anymore either!), so this is what ICAO have come up. AirBus also was way ahead of this by designing airplanes made to be flown by low time pilots.

The 135 market is the USA is not as extensive as many poeple seem to think. GA is used for training, and don't expect people to be able to gain their 1500 through either of these routes any more.

MPL programs typically still require time in GA aircraft, just less of it and more focus on sims and situational training that pilots would not get in a GA environment. Complexity being 1 important aspect.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 08:59 PM
  #213  
Apokleros's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: ERJ
Default

You want part 135 opportunities? Seek them out in Alaska. I just got hired by a VFR part 135 operator, flying 207s. I thought that I would be stuck with instructing all the way up to 1500 hours. Heck, my company is known for hiring guys with wet commercial hours without prior Alaska time and putting them in a multi-turbine airplane until they reach the needed time for VFR PIC. This place is a safe haven for part 135s.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 09:30 PM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Default Overlooked

Originally Posted by Apokleros
You want part 135 opportunities? Seek them out in Alaska. I just got hired by a VFR part 135 operator, flying 207s. I thought that I would be stuck with instructing all the way up to 1500 hours. Heck, my company is known for hiring guys with wet commercial hours without prior Alaska time and putting them in a multi-turbine airplane until they reach the needed time for VFR PIC. This place is a safe haven for part 135s.
That is a place where 135 is still strong, Alaska. Some, including myself overlooked it.
Reply
Old 08-01-2014 | 02:32 PM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Default

Originally Posted by outaluckagain
The 135 market is the USA is not as extensive as many poeple seem to think.
Not for lacking of trying. I have a friend that owns a flight school in Dallas and has been trying to get a 135 going for four years. Keeps getting stonewalled by the FAA. Recently got a letter that said (paraphrased) "we don't have the resources to address your application so it's indefinitely on hold."

I contacted an FAA friend in another district that put me in touch with their 135 point of contact. That person advised that the only way to get a 135 going these days was to rent a PO BOX and a pseudo office in a low volume district (i.e. North Dakota) and try and push it through there. Several people I know have the equipment and finances to go through the process but are being unduly burdened from a regulatory standpoint.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 05:58 AM
  #216  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

I hear the best way to do it is to buy an existing Part 135 company.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 06:20 AM
  #217  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 43
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
I hear the best way to do it is to buy an existing Part 135 company.
That's tricky too, because technically you can't "buy" a 135 certificate and put your name on it. The certificate is issued to one person. That said, the FAA does have a "transfer" process, but you still need to get everything changed over in the manuals and documents, which will be looked at due to the required name change. If something is wrong and was not caught earlier, the process could be long and hard.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 06:20 AM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
But what you are missing here is the way we all used to build time, rather than pay the "big bucks" to get hired at 300 hours are slowly drying up. The environment is very different from 10 or even 5 years ago. Mom and pop flight schools are shutting down all over the place due to lack of students and the increased cost of flying in general. These guys now are paying what it cost me for an instructor and the airplane for a mid 70s 172 DRY. Plus all the check operations have dried up. The few opportunities that are left are being targeted by regional airlines to create a pipeline for these college grads to build time for the restricted ATP. Plus some of the flight requirements for the ATP have increased as well. Building the 1500 hours was the easy part, but getting all the instrument, night, and XC could be difficult for a CFI.

Not saying I advocate going head over heels into debt for this job (I didn't). But going "the hard way" has gotten a hell of a lot harder due to the new ATP rule and the decreasing opportunities for time building jobs.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:01 AM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by l1011
No, The answer is when the 73 crashes you kill far more people than in a Gulfstream.
The accident rate for corporate aviation is higher than for 121 operations
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 07:10 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock
I think it has pretty much become the std. 250 hour commercial license followed by sim time and a lot of ground school. Other countries don't have extensive GA and 135 operations (we don't have them anymore either!), so this is what ICAO have come up. AirBus also was way ahead of this by designing airplanes made to be flown by low time pilots.
Yes and when the computers stop working on that airbus (AirFrance 447) the low-time ab-initio relief pilot at the controls who did not possess basic stall recovery skills-likely because he was hired with very low flight time-kills all 228 people on board.

Last edited by Chupacabras; 08-02-2014 at 07:21 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MetalGear
Technical
8
01-24-2013 08:08 PM
jumppilot
Safety
27
07-18-2012 08:32 AM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
Todzilla
Cargo
34
06-30-2009 11:29 AM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices