FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Easily said when you're 30. Let's see how you feel when someone orders you to give up something you love on an arbitrary date. Your perspective may change.
#32
Backpedal?
What I wrote is 100% factually accurate, but you inferred something from it that was not intended - that's your problem not mine. Clarifying as to avoid misunderstanding and false conclusions like you obviously made is hardly a "backpedal".
Exxon obviously has a mandatory retirement age...as have a number of other Fortune 500 flight departments.
Your local company operating a Citation or King Air, yeah, probably not.
What I wrote is 100% factually accurate, but you inferred something from it that was not intended - that's your problem not mine. Clarifying as to avoid misunderstanding and false conclusions like you obviously made is hardly a "backpedal".
Guess what? They won't.
Your local company operating a Citation or King Air, yeah, probably not.
#33
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
#34
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
OK, so you have ONE example. With the airlines hiring hundreds of pilots and the regionals going begging, what do you want to bet the fractionals will be hiring more and more retiring airline pilots, especially if they have large numbers of airplanes on the order books.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Agreed. However, how do you then justify NO AGE LIMIT for Corporate/Fractional pilots? I've personally flown with a number of pilots who are about to age out who can and do fly rings around the younger guys.
Pass your FAA physical, keep flying. That'll take a small but significant chunk out of the "pilot shortage."
Pass your FAA physical, keep flying. That'll take a small but significant chunk out of the "pilot shortage."
Many items in aviation are life limited do you propose the mechanic runs the engine for an unlimited amount of time or years as long as it passes "his" inspection once a or twice a year. Besides AMEs really don't carry the same liability inspecting you as the mechanic does inspecting the hot section.
#36
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
I prefer flying multi-million dollar jets and getting paid for it. But, that's just me.
#37
Yes, and if you had critica reading skills you would realize that is exactly what the Exxon ruling in the NBAA link I posted did - it upheld Part 91 flight departments having the same mandatory retirement age as 121 airlines.
One might note I did not write that the court required or regulated the 121 retirement age on 91 flight departments.
I have more than one example, but its not my business to discuss what the policy of operations other than my own.
As to frax hiring retired airline pilots, you're probably right.
But for the third time, 91K isn't public common carriage and fractionals are NOT growing airframes with their orders - they are recapitalizing their existing fleets.
One might note I did not write that the court required or regulated the 121 retirement age on 91 flight departments.
OK, so you have ONE example. With the airlines hiring hundreds of pilots and the regionals going begging, what do you want to bet the fractionals will be hiring more and more retiring airline pilots, especially if they have large numbers of airplanes on the order books?
As to frax hiring retired airline pilots, you're probably right.
But for the third time, 91K isn't public common carriage and fractionals are NOT growing airframes with their orders - they are recapitalizing their existing fleets.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Well you should just fly that 172 with a young person, it'll get real exciting real quick.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Yes, and if you had critica reading skills you would realize that is exactly what the Exxon ruling in the NBAA link I posted did - it upheld Part 91 flight departments having the same mandatory retirement age as 121 airlines.
One might note I did not write that the court required or regulated the 121 retirement age on 91 flight departments.
I have more than one example, but its not my business to discuss what the policy of operations other than my own.
As to frax hiring retired airline pilots, you're probably right.
But for the third time, 91K isn't public common carriage and fractionals are NOT growing airframes with their orders - they are recapitalizing their existing fleets.
One might note I did not write that the court required or regulated the 121 retirement age on 91 flight departments.
I have more than one example, but its not my business to discuss what the policy of operations other than my own.
As to frax hiring retired airline pilots, you're probably right.
But for the third time, 91K isn't public common carriage and fractionals are NOT growing airframes with their orders - they are recapitalizing their existing fleets.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Also, if they do grow it would have to be new aircraft users. They might grow as pilots are harder to find, but it would be at the expense of a traditional 91 flight department. IE a CJ2 owner sells his jet lays-off pilots and buys a share of a Hawker 800. Total pilots required would not increase.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post