Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training >

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAA looks at revising tougher pilot training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2014 | 07:43 PM
  #81  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 61
Default

Originally Posted by dl773
1. Eliminate the Sim requirements.
2. Keep 1500
3. Require a minimum combined experience in the cockpit (say, 5000 hours)
4. Require maximum total combined age at the controls (say, 120 years).

The pilots of 3407 didn't even have a combined 1000 hours experience in the Q400. The above, combined with the new 1000 PIC requirements, should be enough.
I def think there should be a min time requirement no more green on green type of waivers and some form of combined min experience like you said. I've flown green on green it was incredibly dangerous and I can't believe the FAA signed off on it.
Reply
Old 07-25-2014 | 07:55 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by dl773
4. Require maximum total combined age at the controls (say, 120 years).
Assuming Age 65, this provision would mean that you'd have to be at least 56 to be a 121 FO.

Aside from that, the combined total time, time in type, and age is an interesting concept.
Reply
Old 07-25-2014 | 08:26 PM
  #83  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer
Assuming Age 65, this provision would mean that you'd have to be at least 56 to be a 121 FO.

Aside from that, the combined total time, time in type, and age is an interesting concept.
Math. You're doing it wrong.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 02:01 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,472
Likes: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
Math. You're doing it wrong.
I laughed out loud. Thank you.

They already have something like the max combined age in that if you are over 60, the FO isn't permitted to be over 60. I think that covers it.

I think "green on green" needs a change but I don't know that total hour mandates are the way to do it. I don't have another solution, but reserve staffing would be an absolute nightmare.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 07:31 AM
  #85  
Slick111's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Default Analogy.

Imagine a consortium of lower-end hospitals and medical clinics across the country whining that they are having a hard time attracting doctors to practice at their hospital for $20,000/year.

Now imagine that those same hospitals and clinics want to lower the requirements for their employees to be able to perform surgeries such that only a bachelors degree in biology or anatomy is needed.

Then imagine that this these hospitals and clinics are not required to tell their patients which of their surgeons are actually doctors and which are merely 22 year-old biology majors.

Anyone see a problem with this arrangement?
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 07:47 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Imagine a consortium of lower-end hospitals and medical clinics across the country whining that they are having a hard time attracting doctors to practice at their hospital for $20,000/year.

Now imagine that those same hospitals and clinics want to lower the requirements for their employees to be able to perform surgeries such that only a bachelors degree in biology or anatomy is needed.

Then imagine that this these hospitals and clinics are not required to tell their patients which of their surgeons are actually doctors and which are merely 22 year-old biology majors.

Anyone see a problem with this arrangement?
Well said.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 09:25 AM
  #87  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Imagine a consortium of lower-end hospitals and medical clinics across the country whining that they are having a hard time attracting doctors to practice at their hospital for $20,000/year.

Now imagine that those same hospitals and clinics want to lower the requirements for their employees to be able to perform surgeries such that only a bachelors degree in biology or anatomy is needed.

Then imagine that this these hospitals and clinics are not required to tell their patients which of their surgeons are actually doctors and which are merely 22 year-old biology majors.

Anyone see a problem with this arrangement?
And imagine if you could go from Zero to Surgeon in only a few months!
Thank goodness times are changing.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 10:10 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
And imagine if you could go from Zero to Surgeon in only a few months!
Thank goodness times are changing.
Yea, but hopefully we are not going back to "zero to surgeon in a few months", that's the challenge here.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 11:16 AM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

When places like Allegiant have 3 month upgrades, it says a lot about the state of the industry.
Reply
Old 07-26-2014 | 11:22 AM
  #90  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Historically most incapacitation's have been in the 45 to 55 age range.
Originally Posted by Packrat
You are correct, Sir.
Is incapacitation the only issue to be concerned about?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MetalGear
Technical
8
01-24-2013 08:08 PM
jumppilot
Safety
27
07-18-2012 08:32 AM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
Todzilla
Cargo
34
06-30-2009 11:29 AM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices