Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mainline buying regionals >

Mainline buying regionals


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mainline buying regionals

Old 12-09-2014 | 03:32 PM
  #81  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Clarification needed, WHEN?

Back when there were the "commuters" and under code share?

Or early 90's when it was brought under the same paint job?

Who exactly was is campaigning?
When the planes starting being painted in the mainline partners paint scheme vs codeshare.
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 03:44 PM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That is a former northwest guy that transporter was going off on. I used to jumpseat on Delta frequently before I got hired there and was always treated very nice (except for one oddball, who as it turns out is one of the most hated ATL captains).
As a DCI pilot, I can tell with about 90 percent accuracy whether especially the captain was FNWA or DAL. The FNWA pilots are much more friendly to the DCI pilots on whole. My point still stands. The DCI pilots are doing the exact same job, flying the exact same passengers. If they aren't good enough to be Delta pilots without interviewing and being blessed by Delta, why have you let some of them fly Delta passengers on Delta painted aircraft, most of which are also owned by Delta for decades now?
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 03:51 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 106
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
When the planes starting being painted in the mainline partners paint scheme vs codeshare.
Who were they?

Because they were in the minority.
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 04:36 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
I was on the ASA MEC in that time frame, and I attended ALL of the meetings (not just one). I can testify that there WAS a prenup, between ASA and CMR and the two MECs even had a handshake agreement to merge seniority on straight DOH as our seniority lists almost matched exactly. The only part you have correct is that staple wasn't and never should have been an option. The goal was, as you said, to invoke ALPA merger policy. That could have been a seniority rig, or any other negotiated/arbitrated list. The handful calling for straight DOH between CMR/ASA and DAL were a vast and vocal minority. Nobody in a serious decision making position thought a 20 year RJ captain was going to fly a DAL 767.

But because of the rumors, misinformation, and biases passed around that the RJ pukes were trying to "steal' DAL seniority, DALPA vowed to kill it, and since they had DAL management by the balls, DAL never pushed it. DALPA was then and still is adamant that no regional pilot will ever get a spot on "their" seniority list with out being "properly vetted" by their exhaustive interview process (which DAL doesn't even use any more). Which really shot themselves in the foot, because the "RJ problem' could have been solved 10 years ago, putting them in a massive competitive position in every way.
For the bolded, I'm glad you admit that. You wanted to take the runway, reach V1 and then hash out the details. All part of "the process" in all its righteousness. What if the arbitrator gave full or partial relative? Oh well, its the process!

By not agreeing to a staple on the front end there was no way it stood any chance.

As for the interview, its pretty much (almost exactly) what it always was. The physical is gone, but the rest of it remains. There is still a psych component that consists of I think a couple tests comprised of many hundreds of questions and an interview, in Midtown. The cog test, knowledge test and panel interview remain as well.

The argument that interviews are bogus because merged pilots didn't do them is ridiculous. What airline has ever said "well we merged with XYZ and took their pilots, so let's get rid of interviews"?

There was zero chance the top ASA/CMR pilot was ever, ever, ever going to be one number senior to the DL plug. Ever. Going for a land grab while wraping yourself around "the process" wasn't just an assault on the DL pilot group, it ended up tanking your own efforts and costing many ASA/CMR pilots what *may have been* a spot on the DL list…in their seniority order, at the bottom.

The PID guys thought they had it locked down and they went for it. You are right that they didn't expect DOH, but they did expect something greater than a staple. They knew the 20 year RJ guy wasn't going to likely slide on over to 767 Captain, but they absolutely did think that the 20 year RJ guy was going to get a lot more than a staple. And they intended to "go for it" by any means necessary. They overplayed their hand in a miscalculated fit of optimistic greed and in differing yet similar ways, all three groups suffered as a result.
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 04:49 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Bartender
Sorry 80kts, but transporter is correct. I came from another profession before this one, and I have never seen such a level of contempt and second class citizenship between professionals as I have seen between legacy mainline and regional pilots. It's disgusting quite frankly. Delta is the worse offender. The Northwest guys treat us much better. The points being made here are valid, the mainline guys just won't accept that they look down their nose at regional pilots.
I don't know anyone at DL that looks down their noses at regional pilots. You've been consuming too many stereotypical "van admiral" stories from the 80's or whatever.

I've observed a LOT of regional jumpseaters on DL flights. For every 1 DL pilot that is prickly towards them, I've seen 100 welcome them aboard with open arms, or take their own bags downstairs to make room for the regional pilot's bag, or take the FA jumpseat to get them on. And 9 out of the 10 of that 1 in 100 that were jerks would have been jerks to anyone. But I'm willing to bet there isn't a regional airline around that doesn't have their 1%ers that are jerks.

When you accuse others so broadly, and so baselessly, of having a chip on their shoulder when its not true, it kind of makes you look like you have one on yours.

Everyone's hiring right now and likely will be for a while. Want a better airline job? Do the work and prep and get a better airline job. I'm sure you're qualified WRT skill. There are other things they look at though, personality being one of the big ones.

Don't get bogged down with defensive pessimism or blame others. Stick with it, and always work to improve yourself. You'll get to where you want to be.
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 04:53 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
For the bolded, I'm glad you admit that. You wanted to take the runway, reach V1 and then hash out the details. All part of "the process" in all its righteousness. What if the arbitrator gave full or partial relative? Oh well, its the process!

By not agreeing to a staple on the front end there was no way it stood any chance.

As for the interview, its pretty much (almost exactly) what it always was. The physical is gone, but the rest of it remains. There is still a psych component that consists of I think a couple tests comprised of many hundreds of questions and an interview, in Midtown. The cog test, knowledge test and panel interview remain as well.

The argument that interviews are bogus because merged pilots didn't do them is ridiculous. What airline has ever said "well we merged with XYZ and took their pilots, so let's get rid of interviews"?

There was zero chance the top ASA/CMR pilot was ever, ever, ever going to be one number senior to the DL plug. Ever. Going for a land grab while wraping yourself around "the process" wasn't just an assault on the DL pilot group, it ended up tanking your own efforts and costing many ASA/CMR pilots what *may have been* a spot on the DL list…in their seniority order, at the bottom.

The PID guys thought they had it locked down and they went for it. You are right that they didn't expect DOH, but they did expect something greater than a staple. They knew the 20 year RJ guy wasn't going to likely slide on over to 767 Captain, but they absolutely did think that the 20 year RJ guy was going to get a lot more than a staple. And they intended to "go for it" by any means necessary. They overplayed their hand in a miscalculated fit of optimistic greed and in differing yet similar ways, all three groups suffered as a result.
Your buddy Sailingfun, who was in the DALPA "inner circle" says it doesn't matter what ASA and CMR did. He says ALPA doesn't control mergers and can't force them. He says it is purely a management function and wouldn't have happened regardless of a pre-nup. What say you?
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 05:00 PM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I don't know anyone at DL that looks down their noses at regional pilots. You've been consuming too many stereotypical "van admiral" stories from the 80's or whatever.

I've observed a LOT of regional jumpseaters on DL flights. For every 1 DL pilot that is prickly towards them, I've seen 100 welcome them aboard with open arms, or take their own bags downstairs to make room for the regional pilot's bag, or take the FA jumpseat to get them on. And 9 out of the 10 of that 1 in 100 that were jerks would have been jerks to anyone. But I'm willing to bet there isn't a regional airline around that doesn't have their 1%ers that are jerks.

When you accuse others so broadly, and so baselessly, of having a chip on their shoulder when its not true, it kind of makes you look like you have one on yours.

Everyone's hiring right now and likely will be for a while. Want a better airline job? Do the work and prep and get a better airline job. I'm sure you're qualified WRT skill. There are other things they look at though, personality being one of the big ones.

Don't get bogged down with defensive pessimism or blame others. Stick with it, and always work to improve yourself. You'll get to where you want to be.
Gloopy, I both jumpseat and DH on Delta a lot. I get treated good either way. However, there is a difference between the FNWA crews and the LDAL pilots. I can't describe it, but there is a different feeling. We notice most when we deadhead and aren't jumpseating. The FNWA crews are much more friendly. We all notice it. Every airline has a culture. The DAL culture is different than all the other legacy carriers. Sorry if you find that offensive, but it exists. You can tell a difference between the DAL and Western guys usually too.

I appreciate your concern for me. I'm happy where I'm at. I'm too old to move on. This is a second carrier for me and as I said before, my previous profession didn't have such a divide between members of the same profession. In addition, the pay and lifestyle didn't have such a wide divide between the bottom and top of the same job as this one does. For the life of me, I don't understand why there is such a difference between the top and bottom in this profession. It doesn't exist like this in any other profession.
Reply
Old 12-09-2014 | 05:04 PM
  #88  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,569
Likes: 322
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

I seem to remember ALPA can only force a merger if there is "operational integration." I don't think that was ever the plan with DAL and CMR/ASA, or UAL with ARW, or USAir with whoever they brought. It was about control.
Reply
Old 12-10-2014 | 04:02 AM
  #89  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
For the bolded, I'm glad you admit that. You wanted to take the runway, reach V1 and then hash out the details. All part of "the process" in all its righteousness. What if the arbitrator gave full or partial relative? Oh well, its the process!

By not agreeing to a staple on the front end there was no way it stood any chance.

As for the interview, its pretty much (almost exactly) what it always was. The physical is gone, but the rest of it remains. There is still a psych component that consists of I think a couple tests comprised of many hundreds of questions and an interview, in Midtown. The cog test, knowledge test and panel interview remain as well.

The argument that interviews are bogus because merged pilots didn't do them is ridiculous. What airline has ever said "well we merged with XYZ and took their pilots, so let's get rid of interviews"?

There was zero chance the top ASA/CMR pilot was ever, ever, ever going to be one number senior to the DL plug. Ever. Going for a land grab while wraping yourself around "the process" wasn't just an assault on the DL pilot group, it ended up tanking your own efforts and costing many ASA/CMR pilots what *may have been* a spot on the DL list…in their seniority order, at the bottom.

The PID guys thought they had it locked down and they went for it. You are right that they didn't expect DOH, but they did expect something greater than a staple. They knew the 20 year RJ guy wasn't going to likely slide on over to 767 Captain, but they absolutely did think that the 20 year RJ guy was going to get a lot more than a staple. And they intended to "go for it" by any means necessary. They overplayed their hand in a miscalculated fit of optimistic greed and in differing yet similar ways, all three groups suffered as a result.
You are correct in most of your assertions. The 20 year regional guys would never have accepted a staple and the DAL guys never would have offered more. Yes, the PID failed because of massive egos on the DAL side. No, the PID wasn't a "land grab", it was a request for ALPA to follow its own rules. instead, ALPA chose to change the rules. Never before had two ALPA carriers, with significant operational integration been acquired by a larger carrier and not merged into the larger carrier, much less each other.

My question to you is why do you feel this is fair? Why do you feel they were inferior to you? You both do the exact same job for the same company. Flying a heavy doesn't make you a better pilot than flying an RJ. In fact, it probably makes you less proficient simply because you fly less.
Reply
Old 12-10-2014 | 05:12 AM
  #90  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
My question to you is why do you feel this is fair? Why do you feel they were inferior to you? You both do the exact same job for the same company. Flying a heavy doesn't make you a better pilot than flying an RJ. In fact, it probably makes you less proficient simply because you fly less.
It's career expectations; Losing seniority in a merger is horrifying, ask me how I know..... It's even more horrifying when the person who is going ahead of you makes considerably less, and was always going to make less. ALPA merger policy is broken in this regard, you can't have regionals with mainline in the same union, it simply doesn't work. There is zero chance of the regionals going away so long as ALPA represents us, because every merger will be seen as a seniority grab, even if it's not. Thus ALPA can not even begin to fight to take back any of that flying. They can simply just hold the line, and hope the market eliminates that flying by itself. The problem with this though is the market only appears to be eliminating Delta's regional flying, due to the arrogance of mainline. It's going to be interesting to see what Delta does, but they have already RFP'd a lot of flying, and there are no takers. Meanwhile, hundreds of our guys flock to AA, and UAL's regionals, resetting their longevity in the process.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Jefferson
Regional
33
05-26-2014 07:59 PM
Flyboydan
Major
32
07-14-2008 02:14 AM
tprangner
Regional
12
06-05-2008 01:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices