Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pilot Shortage (2015 Embry Riddle summit) >

Pilot Shortage (2015 Embry Riddle summit)

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pilot Shortage (2015 Embry Riddle summit)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2015, 07:03 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by CLT Guy View Post
I'll save them two days....pay more at the regional level and there is no longer a shortage.
"Regionals" shouldn't be like minor league baseball. It's real flying in real airplanes with real passengers, accounting for about 50% of all departures.

That's not likely to happen, but it's what should happen.
But don't the minors play real baseball in real towns in front of real fans?

Bottom line is its all supply and demand. If the companies were allowed to outsource the labor reliably to foreigners safely they would in a heartbeat. As professionals we have to hold out for appropriate compensation.
full of luv is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 07:29 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 679
Default

If we operated in a free labor market, this problem would not exist. The RLA allows wages to stay lower than they would otherwise and encourages prospective pilots to not even enter the profession.

There should have been many small corrections over the last decade, but now we are gearing up for a huge correction. At the rate regional pilots are leaving and are being hired, the size of the regional work force will shrink by an increasing percentage every year. Within 5 years there will be just a few thousand regional pilots left if nothing changes.

Even adding another 10-20k per year will do nothing. Most want mainline jobs that pay even more. The point that it would be viable to stay at a regional is the point that it no longer makes sense to operate the Arline as the cost advantage will no longer exist.
Ray Red is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 07:39 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slick111's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by CLT Guy View Post
This has very little credibility as it is being held at a place that stands to benefit from the perception that there is a pilot shortage and attended by companies that created the shortage in the first place by driving wages down for decades.
^^^^^ This just needed to re-stated. Spot-on! ^^^^^^^^
Slick111 is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 07:48 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slick111's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by knobcrk View Post
What they need to do is lower the income gap between regional and mainline. I think a regional ca knows they shouldn't be making 200 bucks an hour flying a 70 seater but at the same time they should be making slightly below the wage of a mainline guy flying a 90 seater like a 190. So about 120 an hour. Same with FOs, the average mainline FOs pay is around 90 to 100 bucks an hour. They should be close to that at least 60 to 70.
**********************************

Is there any question that ^^^ THIS ^^^^ would, (in very short-order), solve the shortage of pilots for any regional airline adoptin it?

I don't think so. But hey, let's convene a two-day summit at Humpty Diddle to see if we can come up with an idea (other than increasing pay) to solve the problem that WE CREATED!!!!

I snicker at the mental image of these self-important stuffed-shirts attending this conference and craning their necks to avoid seeing that HUGE elephant in the room. "What elephant?? I don't see an elephant!! Who left that big pile of elephant dung on the floor??"
Slick111 is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 07:57 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 679
Default

Originally Posted by knobcrk View Post
But they will always need regional feed at at the end of the day a regional CA/FO that makes 150 bucks an hour collectively is still cheaper than a mainline crew that might make 3 times that.

What they need to do is lower the income gap between regional and mainline. I think a regional ca knows they shouldn't be making 200 bucks an hour flying a 70 seater but at the same time they should be making slightly below the wage of a mainline guy flying a 90 seater like a 190. So about 120 an hour. Same with FOs, the average mainline FOs pay is around 90 to 100 bucks an hour. They should be close to that at least 60 to 70.
Mainline rates are not 3x regional rates for similar size a/c. Probably closer to 1.5x. Even lowering the income gap (presumably by increasing regional wages) would not stop the desire of regional pilots to move to mainline carriers. If I asked my FO this trip if he was making $70/hr would be pull his app from AA, DL, and UA where he would make the same first year, he would laugh.

The cost advantage does not only lie in pilot wages. As the regional experience large scale shrinkage, the Cheif:Indian ratio changes as well. I don't know where the break even point is, but with a small number of aircraft, it would be cheaper to staple and pay mainline RJ rates and eliminating the whole management structure and it would to keep a whole management team and infrastructure.
Ray Red is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 08:01 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 679
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
**********************************

Is there any question that ^^^ THIS ^^^^ would, (in very short-order), solve the shortage of pilots for any regional airline adoptin it?

I don't think so. But hey, let's convene a two-day summit at Humpty Diddle to see if we can come up with an idea (other than increasing pay) to solve the problem that WE CREATED!!!!

I snicker at the mental image of these self-important stuffed-shirts attending this conference and craning their necks to avoid seeing that HUGE elephant in the room. "What elephant?? I don't see an elephant!! Who left that big pile of elephant dung on the floor??"
I think this is why we will see a huge correction in the next few years. If they changed first year FO pay to $75/hr and some guy decided that he now wants to be an airline pilot and takes his first lesson this afternoon, I would be a minimum of 2 years before he could sit in the right seat (if he can get a loan for training costs). Or 4-5 years via the college route.
Ray Red is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 08:08 AM
  #47  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

A lot of good points and valid observations have been made in this thread. One negative bullet point mentioned that scared me a little bit was increasing retirement to age 67.

Obviously they'd only be kicking the can down the road, but its viability scares me. Everyone's career delayed another two years. And aside from pushing Congress to pass it, the airline's wouldn't have to do anything else to address the real issues, leaving us stuck in regional limbo.

I think at the end of the day, what we truly need to see is higher airfares. To get competent rampers in Denver, to rival the in-flight quality of Singapore/Emirates (I'd argue that's important if US carriers hope to stay competitive internationally), and to pay pilots a reasonable wage. Joe Pax can fly Spirit if he doesn't like it.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 08:14 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
there is no shortage in the US, just an industry that is addicted to cheap labor and wants it to come back again. That's what this summit is really about.
There isn't a shortage, but there is an insufficient infrastructure/pipeline for future needs. Like you said, there is more than the potential manpower for today's needs though.

Funny thing is, in their lame B-school attempt to throw a lifeline to cheap labor, they are really laying the groundwork for incredibly high costs they will have to shoulder. 6 figure flight training (on top of 6 figure degrees) just to shave a few month's of time building off the carriculum and 5 figure retention bonuses, etc. are going to cost them way, way more than just fixing the pay to begin with.

Conferences though. LOL. Write offs for everyone! Weeeeeeee!
gloopy is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 08:20 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Left seat of a Jet
Posts: 514
Angry

Stupid people always come up with stupid solutions. Hit the idiot over the head and tell them look at the fine mess you got us into once again.
bozobigtop is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 08:21 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Ray Red View Post
Mainline rates are not 3x regional rates for similar size a/c. Probably closer to 1.5x. Even lowering the income gap (presumably by increasing regional wages) would not stop the desire of regional pilots to move to mainline carriers. If I asked my FO this trip if he was making $70/hr would be pull his app from AA, DL, and UA where he would make the same first year, he would laugh.
Of course he wouldn't pull his apps. He would attrit at probably the same time. The goal isn't to get everyone to become regional lifers. The real issue is getting people in at the bottom so that when he moves on there is someone to replace him. Getting people to financially commit to flight training again. When they see the current regional pay/QOL as it exists now, far fewer people are willing to get into it.

We need quality, affordable experienced based flight training, another stronger GA Revitalization Act with industry specific tort reform and some financial reforms at the college level (or abandon it altogether if they can't figure out how to more affordably give you a reading list of free material and then test you on it) and higher pay/QOL at the regional level. If they did even some of that (as long as pay went up enough) people would start getting back into it.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aceninja
Flight Schools and Training
9
11-20-2023 02:45 PM
Ryanthepilot
Flight Schools and Training
55
01-29-2015 05:09 PM
satpak77
Regional
0
01-01-2015 01:18 PM
av8r88
Flight Schools and Training
129
06-11-2009 08:06 AM
navymmw
Flight Schools and Training
23
07-11-2008 11:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices