The MRJ90 and E175-E2 are done
12-02-2016 | 07:50 PM
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
12-03-2016 | 06:36 AM
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
12-03-2016 | 08:45 AM
#103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,879
Likes: 194
12-03-2016 | 09:31 AM
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
But we own, 100%, the code. We don't split it with the company; its ours. If they want to fly DL code, they must do so IAW our CBA. That means within the limits of the permitted exceptions we allow them, or it must be flown by our pilots. The company has no choice in the matter, and neither does SKYW.
12-03-2016 | 12:09 PM
#107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
The stretch isn't needed for 76 seats anyways.
12-03-2016 | 12:23 PM
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,879
Likes: 194
No point in it. The aircraft would probably be less efficient then using the current engines. They are sized for the 90 seater.
12-03-2016 | 01:41 PM
#109
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Yes, but ATL launched it's new competition in ATL initiative on September 30 2016. Do you think they are going to award those gates to Delta when they are currently trying to leverage Delta out of gates in ATL?
12-03-2016 | 03:49 PM
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,879
Likes: 194
Delta would lose a few but retain most. They have a bit of clout in the Atlanta area.
