Atlas Houston
12-20-2019 | 05:53 AM
#21
All is fine at .79
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 42
From: Paahlot
Based on what I’ve read I wouldn’t call the Captain weak.
He never failed the ride, he wasn’t recommended and he passed after he was.
A very recent upgrade with 157 hrs PIC on the 767 basically means 2-3 months as Captain.
Then he gets paired with somebody who apparently had a fatal flaw in his skills.
He never failed the ride, he wasn’t recommended and he passed after he was.
A very recent upgrade with 157 hrs PIC on the 767 basically means 2-3 months as Captain.
Then he gets paired with somebody who apparently had a fatal flaw in his skills.
12-20-2019 | 07:19 AM
#24
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
PRIA must be useless, or airlines are just ignoring it and play dumb. I'm astounded he got hired at Atlas with that work record, they must be a lot more desperate than I thought. Ditto for Mesa. I hope this gets picked up by the media, maybe in conjunction with a story about the pilot shortage.
I'm also curious about the work records of the pilots involved in the runway overshoot at NAS JAX. That Captain with 13 years made about the same as a 3yr F/O at Delta.
I'm also curious about the work records of the pilots involved in the runway overshoot at NAS JAX. That Captain with 13 years made about the same as a 3yr F/O at Delta.
12-20-2019 | 07:25 AM
#25
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 38
Why aren’t the companies required to send info to a central database so potential employers just pull from there instead of requiring the good will of an applicant to be honest with prior employment?
This is a systematic failure exploited by someone who wanted a career as a pilot and lied as a result. Just wow.
As someone else previously said, this will happen again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is a systematic failure exploited by someone who wanted a career as a pilot and lied as a result. Just wow.
As someone else previously said, this will happen again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-20-2019 | 07:27 AM
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
The A/P wasn't engaged. I don't really care what the report says... It's obvious that the A/P wasn't engaged from what happened and from the video where you can see the jet pull up.
12-20-2019 | 07:29 AM
#27
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
Based on what I’ve read I wouldn’t call the Captain weak.
He never failed the ride, he wasn’t recommended and he passed after he was.
A very recent upgrade with 157 hrs PIC on the 767 basically means 2-3 months as Captain.
Then he gets paired with somebody who apparently had a fatal flaw in his skills.
He never failed the ride, he wasn’t recommended and he passed after he was.
A very recent upgrade with 157 hrs PIC on the 767 basically means 2-3 months as Captain.
Then he gets paired with somebody who apparently had a fatal flaw in his skills.
12-20-2019 | 07:42 AM
#28
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Employers were directed years ago to start saving relevant data for future inclusion so when it goes operational it should go back about ten years. Although it will probably be more complete for records created after the date of implementation.
Caution: the airman records are not necessarily complete (mine are not) and accurate in PRD, so just because something is missing in PRD do NOT assume an employer can't get it via PRIA or FOIA.
I'm guessing this situation will lead to an expedited full implementation of PRD
12-20-2019 | 07:45 AM
#29
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 38
It was mandated by law after colgan, it's called the "Pilot Record Database" and it's only partially functional to date. Your FAA records (specific stuff, not everything) are available but the employer records part has not been implemented yet.
Employers were directed years ago to start saving relevant data for future inclusion so when it goes operational it should go back about ten years. Although it will probably be more complete for records created after the date of implementation.
Caution: the airman records are not necessarily complete (mine are not) and accurate in PRD, so just because something is missing in PRD do NOT assume an employer can't get it via PRIA or FOIA.
I'm guessing this situation will lead to an expedited full implementation of PRD
Employers were directed years ago to start saving relevant data for future inclusion so when it goes operational it should go back about ten years. Although it will probably be more complete for records created after the date of implementation.
Caution: the airman records are not necessarily complete (mine are not) and accurate in PRD, so just because something is missing in PRD do NOT assume an employer can't get it via PRIA or FOIA.
I'm guessing this situation will lead to an expedited full implementation of PRD
Hmm... FAA oversight failures.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-20-2019 | 08:10 AM
#30
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
