Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Atlas Houston

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2019 | 01:26 PM
  #41  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1
When I worked at a well known cargo contractor they hired a guy who did not have a commercial SEL for the Caravan. He had a MEL commercial and somehow thought that automagically gave him a SEL commercial. He was "interviewed by 2 people in HR, had his credentials checked by a 3rd person in HR".

Then was interviewed by the Chief Pilot and one other person.

Got the "entire way through indoc and ground school" and was sent off to Flight safety who fortunately hires better record checkers and Flight Safety caught the discrepancy.

During the investigation after this debacle it was found he lied on this application and also said he had a ATP that he did not have.

Then that "contract" cargo company company who shall remain nameless told said idiot that if he went out and got his commercial SEL he could come back. And "every single person who was involved still works there" except said idiot who had he stayed would be one of many in the village of idiots. And where was the FAA in all this????

Given what I have seen in my career in aviation I am not surprised one single bit that this accident happened the way it did.
What role would the FAA play in the story you told?
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 01:30 PM
  #42  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash
Question for the group --

I do not see any indications in the Docket that the NTSB interviewed anyone above the level of Director.

Am I missing something?

Surely the NTSB can not think that the responsibility for this situation stops at the Director of Training/HR?
They will not really attempt to address broader corporate cultural issues much beyond CRM and middle-management. Elite business leaders (and their political cronies) do not want mid-level federal fact checkers trying to second-guess their business vision with nebulous cultural assessments. Middle-managers are paid to take the fall for that kind of thing.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 01:32 PM
  #43  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
I agree with your sentiment. What I suppose I’d be looking for is a database, at a minimum, of prior employers you’ve worked for. With this, one could verify all prior employment and not just what an applicant has stated.

It's right here: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_poli...ords_database/


And it might even get finished faster now.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 01:34 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 326
Default

I think what is truly interesting about this accident is just how many miss steps were made along the way not just in the actual event but the pilot selection process to training history as well.

Three regional carriers who are certainly more hard up for pilots had the cajones to say NFW to this guy (AWAC also interviewed and declined to hire the Colgan FO) without knowing about his background yet Atlas found his performance to be acceptable?

On a side note I flew with one of the management pilots that interviewed (and hired) me at a legacy...we had some interesting discussions on hiring and according to him flat the hardest part of choosing to hire someone is determining if what they said in their application is true or made up.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 02:02 PM
  #45  
Av8tr1's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: And hold
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
What role would the FAA play in the story you told?
Seriously? Isn't that the point of certificate actions? Falsification or intentional misrepresentation of pilot qualifications or logbooks? While I can't think of anything specific at the moment I do recall a couple of newsworthy articles about pilots who claimed certificates they did not have.

Isn't that what happened here? The FO presented a falseified training record that did not include all required PRIA records. I would expect (Hope?) the FAA would have done something if they had found out about this guys falsified history prior to this accident. Isn' the whole point of the FAA to ensure rules are followed by pilots and certificate holders?
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 02:08 PM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 4
From: 767 FO
Default

That’s not the only example of a guy with the wrong certs getting through training.

I don’t remember the exact details, but story at my regional was a guy got a few sims In before they figured out he did not have a multi rating.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 02:59 PM
  #47  
Csy Mon's Avatar
Retired.
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 7
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
Coming from the training/checking world, godspeed to each and every TCE/Check Airman/Sim Instructor to ever "sign him off."
Agree: I did the Check Airman gig for a while with a similar outfit.
Refused to sign of guys regardless of their skin color if incompetent.
The discrimination lawsuit white elephant was always in the room, but if we had those dudes up for a ride, we called the FAA in the simulator: Let the Feds fail them and let them sue the Feds for discrimination. Good luck on that.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 03:26 PM
  #48  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1
Seriously? Isn't that the point of certificate actions? Falsification or intentional misrepresentation of pilot qualifications or logbooks? While I can't think of anything specific at the moment I do recall a couple of newsworthy articles about pilots who claimed certificates they did not have.

Isn't that what happened here? The FO presented a falseified training record that did not include all required PRIA records. I would expect (Hope?) the FAA would have done something if they had found out about this guys falsified history prior to this accident. Isn' the whole point of the FAA to ensure rules are followed by pilots and certificate holders?
No.....what happened is that the pilot left out information on his application to an airline.

It seem that you don’t understand the actual situation here.

This is a Airline application/hiring issue.

Do you really want the FAA involve in the airline hiring process - having input whether you get that coveted job you hope to land someday?
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 03:32 PM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by JackStraw
His resume and application did not list employment with Air Wisconsin (April 20, 2012 through August 13, 2012) or CommutAir (May 3, 2011 through June 27, 2011).

When asked to explain any gaps in employment, the FO stated the following on his Atlas Air application: “There were time when I was furloaded [sp] and also went to college to attained [sp] degrees.” Air Wisconsin and CommutAir were not part of the PRIA requested information for the background checks conducted for Atlas Air on the FO.







Great job, HR. How is this application not immediately tossed in the trash?
With grammar mistakes that bad on an application it is shocking that it wasn't immediately thrown in the garbage, but Atlas needed butts in seats immediately for Amazon. Knowing that all of these kids are applying elsewhere that's an application that isn't going to UPS or Delta anytime soon.
Reply
Old 12-20-2019 | 03:38 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by 742Dash
Question for the group --

I do not see any indications in the Docket that the NTSB interviewed anyone above the level of Director.

Am I missing something?

Surely the NTSB can not think that the responsibility for this situation stops at the Director of Training/HR?
I wondered about this too... Sadly the FAA doesn't care about what the real issue is. DB said in her interview that Management wanted 700 pilots a year. Where is Southern gonna get 350 a year with that contract? What airplane were they gonna fly? Probably a good question to ask JD or BF.

Sadly this means that this is still going on today and DB has HUGE incentive to "miss" that someone didn't complete upgrade after looking at thousands of resumes over the past 20 years.... And when she does notice instead of calling the airline and just asking she can assume that the candidate's "house burned down during training".
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FmrPropCapt
Atlas/Polar
1130
03-25-2019 07:56 AM
LAXative
Atlas/Polar
31
04-06-2016 10:02 AM
F15andMD11
Cargo
18
03-03-2010 04:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
48
12-28-2009 11:11 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices