Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2020, 06:15 AM   #11  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 5,097
Default

Im not sure what the forensic value of ADS-B data and/or FlightAware but now that we are all broadcasting where we are and what we are doing - allegedly with WAAS accuracy, I suppose its going to be put to the test.

on the other hand, I suppose you could go to the FAA N-number database, look up the aircraft ownership, and send them an anonymous letter referencing the FlightAware data for the flight and asking them WTF they thought they were doing. It might prevent a repetition - maybe.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-05-2020, 07:06 AM   #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captive apple's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevecv View Post
Your reaction is telling of your attitude towards recklessness.To imply that I am some sort of tattletale snowflake says a whole lot more about you than it does about me. Next.

Im guessing you thought the same about the people who recorded video of Roy Halladay before his accident into Tampa Bay?
Heres a link for you incase you're not familiar https://www.planeandpilotmag.com/art...-roy-halladay/
Maybe a little close to home. You can change. We all can change. Even Mr.500 ft.
Why not send a letter to this pilot, why not engage in a phone call. Try to understand, love and forgive one another. Mr.500 probably didnt even know he upset you and could probably use that perspective.
captive apple is offline  
Old 08-05-2020, 09:49 AM   #13  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
stevecv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: CFI, II
Posts: 44
Default

For me personally I would take absolutely no pleasure in reporting this to the FSDO, which is why I wanted this forums input on the matter. Writing a letter seems like a great idea just to know what was up. Again, I don't want to put somebody's cert. at stake, especially in these times. Thanks a bunch for the replies!
stevecv is offline  
Old 08-05-2020, 04:09 PM   #14  
777 - ret
 
Huell's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Glider center seat
Posts: 683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevecv View Post
For me personally I would take absolutely no pleasure in reporting this to the FSDO, which is why I wanted this forums input on the matter. Writing a letter seems like a great idea just to know what was up. Again, I don't want to put somebody's cert. at stake, especially in these times. Thanks a bunch for the replies!
I was a FASTeam represenative for a number of years. I made quite a few calls to pilots who were reported of low flying or ostentatious displays ... I would call the pilot and tell them that I had received a call that someone was concerned about them and that I was concerned about their safety ... A soft start so to speak. If the guy had a good attitude I would file my de-identified report and the world continued to turn. Bad attitude I would turn it over to the head of the FASTeam at the FSDO. They would use the same soft start approach. None of this applies to repeat offenders.

If you call the FAA I suggest you talk to the FASTeam guy ... You can probably get a reassurance that they will talk to the guy without a violation. Most guys will do this unless the pilot has a thick file. Then give him the details.

I have seen this make a difference.

But then others ... Not so much.
Huell is offline  
Old 08-05-2020, 08:46 PM   #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,564
Default

These days the FSDO doesn't hammer people unless they tell the inspector to go pound sand. That means if the person is willing to fix said deviation and agree to a corrective action, no certificate action is taken. This is the required approach. It generally takes some fairly egregious acts these days to result in certificate action and actual enforcement cases, which is good, it reduces workload and allows for a much better way to address issues. That all said, I have to wonder about the safety culture that some people seem to be promoting: Anything is ok as long as you can get away with it. The FSDO inspector will investigate it to determine if there is any actual violation/deviation, such as flying low in the vicinity of the airport for the purpose of takeoff/landing is totally appropriate and the actual altitude is what matters, very hard to eyeball for anyone. In this case, there is at least more to go on than the usual "someone flew low over my house", which is akin to "someone just drove really fast through my neighborhood". There are ATC pilot deviations sent to the FSDO for investigation that result in nothing because a violation is not substantiated.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 07:44 PM   #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
firefighterplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 296
Default

Story time.

I was out sailing with a lady friend a few years back, and a guy in a light single was doing low passes over the harbor. Probably 200-300 AGL over the mooring field, turning, descending to 100-150 or so over some large estates on the water...lap after lap after lap, getting lower and lower and lower. Nothing honestly hazardous about the flying in my book, but he was definitely lower than 500 over people/vessels/structures.

Normally, I enjoy a good low pass...but this was getting annoying after about lap 12.

I shot a quick message to the FSDO, withholding the N number, asking if they knew of a single engine Cessna operating at very low altitude in the vicinity on that date and time.

They said it was an airplane with a photography crew doing aerial shoots for a popular TV series, all preapproved. Asked if I witnessed anything unprofessional.

Nope, good to go.

Additionally, civilians are terrible at this stuff. A Navy fighter aircrew was accused of flying over UC Berkeley years ago at like 300-400 by some civilians. It was all over the news.

They pulled the maintenance card data and figured out that the civilians were off by an order of magnitude. Sick one, nerds.
firefighterplt is offline  
Old 08-07-2020, 04:35 PM   #17  
On Reserve
 
AirborneUPSMovr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: T4
Posts: 15
Default

There is an entire facebook page dedicated to some small town in florida which reports every single navy t-6 that flies overhead...typically on approach to landing....and they scream and complain that they are doing 'dive bombing' on their houses....

Anyway....i would not take 3rd party reports as gospel at this point
AirborneUPSMovr is offline  
Old 08-07-2020, 06:10 PM   #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 11,887
Default

Weve made the national news a few times of recent.
People are very wary of low flying aircraft for sure.
USMCFLYR is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will ExpressJet survive this? SeeYa ExpressJet 1475 08-05-2020 09:34 PM
TA passes Kayco United 38 11-13-2012 03:18 PM
Aircraft Order SoCalGuy United 34 07-14-2012 07:12 PM
Position and Hold going bye bye :( woodfinx Hangar Talk 16 08-04-2010 11:59 PM
Update: ExpressJet SkyWest meritflyer ExpressJet 70 06-12-2008 10:05 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 PM.