Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Why are terrorists mostly Arab Muslims? >

Why are terrorists mostly Arab Muslims?

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Why are terrorists mostly Arab Muslims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2013, 06:45 AM
  #41  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
The US via its drone program is a great terrorist organization.

It usually comes down to economics. The Haves and the Have nots....

The "drone" program is not terrorism. It's a part of a larger effort, which happens to get a lot of media attention because it's "cool" or something.

The goal of these programs is to take out fighters and leaders who are planning or attempting to conduct insurgency or terror. That is war or counter-terrorism respectively, not terrorism.

Terrorism is, generally, violence used with the intent to disrupt society in general for typically political ends.

The "drones" are only supposed to target combatants. As to how accurate that targeting is depends on who you talk to. If the RPAs are actually targeting innocents by mistake (which would be very bad), that's tactical or leadership error, not terrorism. I would argue that terrorism requires a certain intent.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 03:59 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
The "drone" program is not terrorism. It's a part of a larger effort, which happens to get a lot of media attention because it's "cool" or something.

The goal of these programs is to take out fighters and leaders who are planning or attempting to conduct insurgency or terror. That is war or counter-terrorism respectively, not terrorism.

Terrorism is, generally, violence used with the intent to disrupt society in general for typically political ends.

The "drones" are only supposed to target combatants. As to how accurate that targeting is depends on who you talk to. If the RPAs are actually targeting innocents by mistake (which would be very bad), that's tactical or leadership error, not terrorism. I would argue that terrorism requires a certain intent.
That is cute. The War on Terror, the invasion of Afghanistan and the illegal invasion and occupancy of Iraq have created more terrorist.... it's like a snake eating its tail.....

At some point you've got to stop reading the script.....
Snarge is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 06:08 AM
  #43  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
That is cute. The War on Terror, the invasion of Afghanistan and the illegal invasion and occupancy of Iraq have created more terrorist.... it's like a snake eating its tail.....

At some point you've got to stop reading the script.....
We aren't reading or writing the script, perhaps you should contact your elected representatives with your concerns.
jungle is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 10:52 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Definition of terrorism in the basic sense:

Quote:
The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
So two kids blow up home-made devices in Boston and the entire city goes on lockdown. Watertown has its 4th amendment suspended, and entire blocks of houses get door-to-door searches with every American citizen forced out of the house at gunpoint. That's terrorism. There is a emergency/safety exception but that is limited to where a threat is though to be - a house or two. NOT entire neighborhoods. Our consitution has been trampeled over and over again, and the biggest terrorist threat to this nation is not the Chechans or foreign Muslims - it is those in DC who are violating the constitution and your rights.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 10:57 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
The US via its drone program is a great terrorist organization.

It usually comes down to economics. The Haves and the Have nots....
True. And how about the elimination of US citizens via drone without due process and trial? There is a "imminent" threat clause for that assasination, but who is to define something is "imminent." The same government that shut down every Embassy in a third world Muslim country because some al Qaeda dude said "do something!"

Give it time. It won't be long before the likes of ex-LAPD cop murdered (Donner?) and this Dimagio kidnapper types will be executed via Predator Drone on our domestic US soil claiming "it would be too dangerous to send police or federal agents in."
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 11:35 AM
  #46  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
So two kids blow up home-made devices in Boston and the entire city goes on lockdown. Watertown has its 4th amendment suspended, and entire blocks of houses get door-to-door searches with every American citizen forced out of the house at gunpoint. That's terrorism. There is a emergency/safety exception but that is limited to where a threat is though to be - a house or two. NOT entire neighborhoods. Our consitution has been trampeled over and over again, and the biggest terrorist threat to this nation is not the Chechans or foreign Muslims - it is those in DC who are violating the constitution and your rights.
This is an excellent point, Shy.

Their acts were terrorist acts, but our response to it is getting more and more concerning. Those who give up freedom for safety will have neither.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 12:38 PM
  #47  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
So two kids blow up home-made devices in Boston and the entire city goes on lockdown. Watertown has its 4th amendment suspended, and entire blocks of houses get door-to-door searches with every American citizen forced out of the house at gunpoint. That's terrorism. There is a emergency/safety exception but that is limited to where a threat is though to be - a house or two. NOT entire neighborhoods. Our consitution has been trampeled over and over again, and the biggest terrorist threat to this nation is not the Chechans or foreign Muslims - it is those in DC who are violating the constitution and your rights.
Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
True. And how about the elimination of US citizens via drone without due process and trial? There is a "imminent" threat clause for that assasination, but who is to define something is "imminent." The same government that shut down every Embassy in a third world Muslim country because some al Qaeda dude said "do something!"

Give it time. It won't be long before the likes of ex-LAPD cop murdered (Donner?) and this Dimagio kidnapper types will be executed via Predator Drone on our domestic US soil claiming "it would be too dangerous to send police or federal agents in."
You should contact your elected representatives with your concerns.
We don't run counter-terror ops out of APC.
__________________
jungle is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 05:32 PM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
That is cute. The War on Terror, the invasion of Afghanistan and the illegal invasion and occupancy of Iraq have created more terrorist.... it's like a snake eating its tail.....

At some point you've got to stop reading the script.....
That has nothing to do with my point...the term "terrorism" is overused and too broadly applied.

Every time it gets misused, some facet of big brother tightens one of the cords another notch...in most cases with the best of intentions but ultimately the same net effect downstream.

Your end of the spectrum is just as guilty of hyperbolic overuse of the term as those who charge 12-years as terrorists based on social media jokes. Anything ya'll don't like is "terrorism"...I've even heard moral opposition to affirmative action and gay marriage described with the "T" word. People with an agenda like the "T" word because it implies an imperative to trample fundamental rights to advance your cause.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 05:51 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
This is an excellent point, Shy.

Their acts were terrorist acts, but our response to it is getting more and more concerning. Those who give up freedom for safety will have neither.
That goes to our response to 911. Civil/police instead of MIL. We've created more terrorist since 911 with MIL activities than our economic foreign policy.

Terrorist, patriot, rebel, loyalist, hero, etc... can be quite subjective....
Snarge is offline  
Old 08-18-2013, 06:10 PM
  #50  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge View Post
That goes to our response to 911. Civil/police instead of MIL. We've created more terrorist since 911 with MIL activities than our economic foreign policy.

Terrorist, patriot, rebel, loyalist, hero, etc... can be quite subjective....
You are very late to the party, but I'm glad to see you are finally catching on.
jungle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
11Fan
Safety
0
09-27-2012 05:32 PM
multipilot
Your Photos and Videos
7
11-14-2008 08:41 AM
SWAjet
Major
5
05-22-2006 12:07 PM
spectrum33
Hangar Talk
0
05-19-2006 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices