Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Safety (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/safety/)
-   -   Malaysian 777 missing (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/safety/80284-malaysian-777-missing.html)

Mazster 03-16-2014 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by LightAttack (Post 1603382)
USMCFlyer, don't feed the trolls.

LOL...Obviously you can't answer the question.:D

blastoff 03-16-2014 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by Mazster (Post 1603393)
LOL...Obviously you can't answer the question.:D

Your question has been answered several times over and ridiculed for its idiocy. In 10 posts you're making quite a name for yourself, and not in a good way.

jungle 03-16-2014 10:48 AM


Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 1603341)
You're using a broad brush stroke in order to describe a very specific event. Yes, there are lots of Muslim terrorist groups. There are also Christian terrorist groups. Just because there are far less doesn't mean they are any less culpable BASED ON THE INFORMATION WE HAVE.

Since we are all making wild accusations, why hasn't anyone blamed the Somali pirates for this? Or Hezbollah? What about Bengal Tigers of India? My point is, just because Islamic terrorists have used airlines against the US in the past for destruction doesn't mean that should be the automatic assumption from now on.

Some of us have had our heads tamped so full of state school bull that we can no longer select the most probable outcome from a list of probable outcomes.
Nobody has made an assumption, they have made a guess based on available evidence, to deny the highest probability is to admit the death of your common sense.

CBreezy 03-16-2014 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by Mazster (Post 1603390)
It's relevant to earlier posts in the thread wherein I was questioning why an intercept was not attempted early on in the incident. I'm not talking about present day. NOTHING was known at that point and in my hypothetical world an intercept might have determined if the 777 was under AP or pilot control.

I still don't understand why this is relevant. If I recall correctly, Malaysian authorities didn't alert anyone of a problem until after the airplane failed to arrive at its destination. Even if the military tracked the aircraft west, do you really think they have airplanes sitting hot alert? In what magical world do you live in where 3rd world countries can scramble an intercept in minutes at 1am? Why aren't you asking if space lasers could tell if anyone was alive in the airplane?

Mazster 03-16-2014 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by blastoff (Post 1603402)
Your question has been answered several times over and ridiculed for its idiocy. In 10 posts you're making quite a name for yourself, and not in a good way.

Sorry but i don't get intimidated. The question was not idiotic and posed in a quite cogent manner. Flippant responses are not necessary. If the moderators don't want me here they can throw me off. Otherwise, I am not here to please you "blastoff" or anyone else of the High and Mighty members of this group. :rolleyes:

CBreezy 03-16-2014 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by jungle (Post 1603403)
Some of us have had our heads tamped so full of state school bull that we can no longer select the most probable outcome from a list of probable outcomes.
Nobody has made an assumption, they have made a guess based on available evidence, to deny the highest probability is to admit the death of your common sense.

This isn't a multiple choice test where you choose the most correct answer. You've been given 3 bricks and are trying to build the Empire State Building. Right now, the only options eliminated from the list of probable outcomes are fiery explosion, landed at destination, and landed at origin. There are now thousands of other possibilities and not enough concrete facts to reasonably even GUESS as the most probable. If crash in ocean, land in Iran, and land on remote island are all logical possibilities, then you actually have no possibilities at all.

blastoff 03-16-2014 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by Mazster (Post 1603409)
Sorry but i don't get intimidated. The question was not idiotic and posed in a quite cogent manner. Flippant responses are not necessary. If the moderators don't want me here they can throw me off. Otherwise, I am not here to please you "blastoff" or anyone else of the High and Mighty members of this group. :rolleyes:

Your initial question was respectful, but quickly debunked. Your responses thereafter have been nothing but condescending towards people with your answers. You come for answers but keep pushing when you don't like the answers. Grow up little man.

Ghost 7X7 03-16-2014 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Mazster (Post 1603409)
I am not here to please you "blastoff" or anyone else of the High and Mighty members of this group. :rolleyes:

For sure. Just to annoy.

Erick 03-16-2014 11:16 AM

Assuming that there is room for the philosophical notion of Occam's Razor along with appropriate critical thinking; what would be the simplest explanation for the disappearance (and behavior) of this aircraft and crew? Again, I am a psychologist and not a pilot but I have greatly enjoyed the discussion and have found more critical thinking in this discussion than just about anywhere else on the 'net.

satpak77 03-16-2014 11:17 AM

Flash forward to today, 45 pages later, with in-fighting amongst APC members, media "experts", etc, today, we have NO factual information of what happened, to include NO factual info that terrorism/criminal activity was involved.

None.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands