SkyWest ?’s

Subscribe
66  116  156  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  176  216  266 
Page 166 of 518
Go to
Quote: Or they just didn’t want to work 3 times as hard for less pay, seems like common sense to me.
...some of a small group who are also of a smaller group that know their game is weak...
far from all or you Ratm0820.
Reply
I guess I was just curious to know if my name and other's would still be vaild on a list somewhere in SkyWest's files when they start bringing new people on again. I'd like to at lest know if all of my hopes of sill flying for SkyWest have been valid for the last year. In the meantime I'll keep teaching steep turns and short field landings to my lovely students. Yay!
Reply
Quote: I guess I was just curious to know if my name and other's would still be vaild on a list somewhere in SkyWest's files when they start bringing new people on again. I'd like to at lest know if all of my hopes of sill flying for SkyWest have been valid for the last year. In the meantime I'll keep teaching steep turns and short field landings to my lovely students. Yay!
Kept doing what you're doing. I learned (the hard way) those whom stick around during the downturns are one day rewarded. This is your first 121 broken heart. It will not be your last.
Reply
Quote: I think some weaker pilots targeted the 175 thinking the fly-o-matic would help them. As far as all new hires going into the CRJ it will make furlough cheaper and easier if they can drain the (likely to be) parked fleet.
I also think the transition classes went very well. In our transition class we had 0 ground school failures, everyone knew the drill. I can’t say with certainty in the Sims, but everyone in Denver got through with zero check failures, zero extra lessons.

I’m fairly confident that’s why the company is choosing to transition instead of bringing in new hires to the 175. As someone else stated, the CRJ does a better job of weeding out weak pilots.
Reply
Quote: I don't want to make my identity too obvious on here. But I am on my second career. And female. And despite all the **** that's happened since I became a pilot, I still prefer aviation to the last career. This assumption is off. I apologize for an idealistic post that made me look naive. I can see that doesn't fly on the forums. Please stop roasting me.
Just ignore it. You’re on the internet, you’re going to get roasted. Let it roll off your back or you will drown in this career, especially when you get people look and stare at you for being a woman pilot, if you can’t handle negative talk on the internet, how the h*** are you going to handle it in real life. Keep your head up and I wish you the best getting out of the pool.
Reply
Quote: Kept doing what you're doing. I learned (the hard way) those whom stick around during the downturns are one day rewarded.
Yes, this is a clear pattern in the long-run.
Reply
Quote: You have no business working in this industry. You are in for repeated huge disappointments. Certainty? Honor? Assurance? In writing?
I'm assuming you didn't mean to sound so harsh, rude, and mean. You might have phrased it "You have no business working in this industry if, you can't take uncertainty, ..."

If I were advising Panda I would tell her that SkyWest treats people with more respect than any other regional and her best bet is to wait for SkyWest, even if they slip in a few Expressjet pilots. When the pandemic is over, and I think it will mostly be over in just over 2 months, the flying will pickup and the first to see it will be Skywest and the first to get more planes will be Skywest.

If you want to see the opposite, the bottom of the bottom, a company who will lie straight to your face, then we'd like to welcome you to GoJet.
Reply
Quote: I'd mostly like to hear that they for sure aren't going to flush the pool. I want to see it from the top in writing. That they are going to honor old job offers in the order they were originally scheduled. We have no assurance they're not going to replace the pool with Compass and Express Jet folks who blow me out of the water and I have no way to compete with. If I was in management I sure would. But I hope they don't.
They won't commit to not flushing because they don't know either way yet. It depends on how long things drag out. At some point they would want to start clean and re-interview (possibly with priority for poolies). It's not so much that they want to replace you with furloughed pilots (they could have already done that), it's that after a year or three poolies might not be as current as they were, or worse might have acquired some employment, FAA, or legal blackmarks. From the HR perspective poolies do have a "shelf-life". How long exactly is subjective.

If I had to guess they will stick with poolies for a while, and are not in a big rush to hire furloughs from defunct airlines. Turbine experienced new-hires are especially helpful when movement is fast because they require less training on average. But since they're in no hurry right now they may prefer to hire the folks they want and spend the resources to train and develop them.
Reply
Quote: I'm assuming you didn't mean to sound so harsh, rude, and mean. You might have phrased it "You have no business working in this industry if, you can't take uncertainty, ..."
Oh grow up peter pan... a good kick in the pants can be good for certain individuals.. Life can be harsh at certain points, deal with it.
Reply
PossibleDeviation
Looks like we got a thick skin guy over here.
Tell us your hardships, you are among friends.
Reply
66  116  156  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  176  216  266 
Page 166 of 518
Go to