Quote:
USAPA's fitness should not be your concern, AFAIC, but the US pilots'. By recognized entity, do you mean the US merger committee, possible separate West representation, or both? I can understand why an APA member would love to have their opponents' representation nowhere to be found during arbitration. It would make things so much "easier" for APA, wouldn't it?
Capt H
Your claim of my "sidestep" means nothing to me even if you now label it "cute". Sorry. I couldn't care less about USAPA's fitness toward you, only that they adhere THIS TIME to what they agreed to and considering their repetitive past should be neutralized so as not to delay the process in perpetuity for the benefit of the airline. In that process, I seek no muzzling of you as an East pilot as your present union seeks to do to the West. It certainly would make East pilots representation in the SLI "much easier" if the West representation was nowhere to be found either, eh ?Originally Posted by Capt Hindsight
Another cute sidestep of the question. You know I wasn't referring to USAPA representation as my discomfort.USAPA's fitness should not be your concern, AFAIC, but the US pilots'. By recognized entity, do you mean the US merger committee, possible separate West representation, or both? I can understand why an APA member would love to have their opponents' representation nowhere to be found during arbitration. It would make things so much "easier" for APA, wouldn't it?
Capt H
Oh wait, USAPA already did that. This whole charade is in part meant to solidify that desire. I think you've got selective judgment and thus claiming my inability to satisfy your demands here is of no surprise and so, no further effort will be made to satisfy the misguided and insatiable.