How much movement do you really think there'd be? And would it be worth it compared with the substandard bullet points?

Total WAG and napkin math stirred in with some PCRB old ass info and ADG, I'd say we're looking at a minimum of 10% and that's probably low.. JMO.

I was having a little fun with you "I'll play".

You did say "we'll see" if the contract requires extra staffing... So yeah, I know you're not selling it bud.

Man I just hope the "leaked", "rumored" and "suggested" "on par with SWA in it's totality" is at least close to true.

I counter your JMO with my JMO. I think it will be less via multiple ways to offset what we assume will require more staffing.

But, JMO.

but whats your WAG?

I think the company discretion 150% premium FCFS window, RSA, and VDA will take care of much of the additional staffing needs. Especially since PTOSB isn't going to be as good of an income supplement as it is now, guys will resort to picking more stuff up, especially at premium, or flying over VAC. Furthermore, I imagine our industry leading pairing construction rules will likely make our trips more efficient, flying more per day, which could further drive down the need for more bodies. Hope I'm wrong and this requires several hundred more bodies. Interested to see more details on Thurs/Fri and go to a roadshow. But things like bidding/pickup patterns and vacation patterns (and flying over it) can't be truly evaluated until it plays out for a while.

My WAG is about 5%. This is JB. Even if the TA REQUIRED 10%, they'd hire 5% or less anyways!

JMO bud!

Oh I took it the wrong way sorry

That NEVER happens on pilot message boards. Ever.

Can’t answer that without the language and see how that would work.