Quote:
Seriously? Are you that dense?
The surrender monkeys of c44 have hijacked the union again. Yea. EB, GH, JL, RG are no doubt toasting their good fortune over a fine Macallan 25 right now. Probably delivered to them by c44.
Originally Posted by Drum
So you don't think if the MEC had directed surrender we would have achieved what we got?Seriously? Are you that dense?
The surrender monkeys of c44 have hijacked the union again. Yea. EB, GH, JL, RG are no doubt toasting their good fortune over a fine Macallan 25 right now. Probably delivered to them by c44.
No one hijacked anything. The vote was 13-7, not even close. For whatever reason, I haven't a clue, our Reps decided to go in a different direction. I find it very, very hard to believe the MEC could get behind anyone who supported TA-1. TA-1 was pretty lame but this is not the end of the world.
A few months back you said something like DAL was going all in or scorched earth on furloughs and I told you it was too early to pass judgement on furloughs. Same deal here - something is going on but I doubt it is 13 Reps planning a surrender party. I would say almost all of our Reps want the same thing - the best deal they can get for the DAL Pilots but they often disagree on how to get there. I personally thought Ryan was doing a great job but our reps obviously are privy to a lot that we don't see so lets all just calm down and give it some time.
One final though,t while I am concerned with a Yes TA-1 voter I also have issues with Reps who voted No on TA-2. Who knows where we would be now if TA-2 failed, Hell we could still be operating on C 2012.
Scoop