Quote:
Originally Posted by 402Fanatic
Yeah I think everyone on here has rightly pointed out that acquisition cost will be a huge issue. Who knows though how much of a discount you'd get if you ordered 50 of anything.
Pardon me for being ignorant on this issue, but why would short flights be brutal on a turboprop. Isn't that what the Caravan was designed for and handles these hops pretty well? I've never worked around a Caravan so I don't have any idea. I know the fuel burn would be on average more for short hops. But I figured they'd be more reliable in any operating circumstance than a piston.
Low altitude flights, ie short trips, are hugely inefficient because turbines efficiency is at the mid to upper 20's in turboprops. The overhauls aren't as much on cycles as they are hours, but cycles are harder on the engines because typically some of the hottest temps on an engine are during start. It's more of an issue in the resale market. Cycles also mean more landings on an airframe, some aircraft are sensitive in this realm, but once again, not a standard issue on turboprops.
Example: TBM850 at 3000ft is burning 75gph, maybe 240ktas, at 27000, 57gph @ 310ktas.