08-08-2016Quote:
Training capacity does seem to be an issue, and I don't think the economics favor a rate of flow above 25% per year.Originally Posted by RTRD
Yeh for more than 25% of the list to flow per rolling year a change would have to be made to the current arrangement. I don't see why Compass would agree to that because of the massive amount of training it would create. 25%/year seems about right to keep payroll costs down and training manageable. And from counting on the seniority list 317 with flow is the right number. I think the recruiter's getting a little carried away.
