I would try emailing the support email address on the pilot credentials page. Theyre very helpful and usually respond within a day or two (if youre worried about their emails going to a junk folder inadvertently, add them to your email contacts list).

Gotcha. I guess I didn't word it correctly; I was simply talking about LOS for pay purposes. I hope you're correct that there is support for this. Browsing C&R doesn't give me a warm fuzzy however.

As far as LOS for the integration calculus...well, that's a whole other ballgame. I'm happy (and thankful, btw) to exercise my contractual right to defer and see how the whole mess is played out. When all is said and done, if it looks like I'm back near the bottom of the integrated list, I might just make the tough decision to gamble my career at JetBlue (or whoever buys us!).

Thanks Ghilis101.

What I've been told directly by a BOD member is that the majority of the BOD favors LOS for pay purposes as a concept, but the sticking point is using JCBA improvement capital to pay for it. Instead of making other pilots pay for it (some of which would object), they believe the company should fund that benefit separate from the JCBA. Prying extra $$$ out of management is going to be difficult, though possible. It is hoped that at least some partial credit could be obtained, but it's a hot potato wildcard for them.

Why would they not integrate the furloughed pilots as DOH? That doesn't seem right, that a furloughed guy would be behind a new hire potentially hired a decade after them. Or is it that the furloughs were given a chance to come back, and declined? I can kinda see both sides.

When you have guys that were on property with AA for less than a year and then furloughed vs US guys that are third-listers that have been on property for 5+ yrs. Is it fair for the AA guys that were barely on property to go senior to the guys that have been there for 5+ yrs? I would think not.
Personally, I think it will go LoS with fences.

My personal feeling? Yes if they took the first recall. No if they deferred. If people are deferring, as far as I'm concerned, they gave up the option to get slotted in at that point. But I have no skin in the game, I'm unbiased. If I was the arbitrator that is what I would do. Maybe.

I guess you've forgotten why they were furloughed. I haven't.

I don't have a problem with a third lister flying their fenced off LCC opportunties and working into a proportion of that flying in the future operation when the fences drop.

But go entirely in front of AA furloughess based on LOS? Sorry, NFW.

AA CA

I am a third lister and I don't know anyone that feels this would be fair. I don't want to advance at the expense of someone else.

Well, this is what United did in their integration.