I agree. I would like to know how they are allowed to build a line at a later date. We have for years had similar lines to Asiana (DWC etc) and they were always considered hard lines with a min guarantee, you flew as and when you were needed. However with CS building a line after the fact they have now been given the ability to use layover days to not pay you or assign R days.

The contract says lines must be built from known flying not constructed at a later date. The Union has been doing some back door deals of late disguised as "experimental" (this 1 status per day BS has already cost me plenty of $$), they don't tell us why etc., we are just supposed to deal with it.

Short article and some good pictures on one less -200.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...ent/100736118/

Thanks, that clears things. Has anyone tried to file a grievance on this?. From what you have written it seems clear to me that these lines do not qualify as hard lines

Link is broken.

Does anyone know how many hours it had on it when it was retired?

Slick

What's the consensus among the pilot group as to the long term viability of K4?

Not sure why the link didn't copy correctly. The auto notification of a response has the correct link, as does it when I try to quote. May depend on how you are viewing the thread.

https://amp-usatoday-com.cdn.ampproj...ory/100736118/

Does anyone know when K4 will be at a job fair?

Thanks in advance.

Yup. I posted a few weeks ago that they will be at one in May.