Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Training issues at SKW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2019, 02:16 PM
  #251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: CRJ
Posts: 372
Default

Originally Posted by trip View Post
Umm, no.
Heard a military dude lit into him when he started talking down to him and got personal with his "your an idiot" routine. This was after he correctly answered every KV question for two hours. The boss happened to be walking by as the student was packing up his things and calling management to let them know he wanted nothing to do with this place.

Yeah.... sounds like this is highly likely blown out of proportion.
Tippy is offline  
Old 04-25-2019, 03:01 PM
  #252  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 81
Default

If ST takes your KV to two hours there isn’t a pilot alive who is answering everything correctly. At that point you’re into the amperage of the dome light wiring...
uncleowen is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 11:57 AM
  #253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,481
Default

Originally Posted by uncleowen View Post
If ST takes your KV to two hours there isn’t a pilot alive who is answering everything correctly. At that point you’re into the amperage of the dome light wiring...
Well, the dome light wiring doesn't have any amperage ��
word302 is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 08:46 PM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I generally concur. Unions help smooth out the market swings and lock in gains, most especially at the majors. The majors must generally declare BK (or be in obvious danger of that) to roll back gains. But the regional system can roll back gains fairly quickly when market conditions permit... they just rebid your flying to someone else. Nobody else wants to bid low enough? If the pilot market is in their favor, they'll just start up a new regional, maybe even an alter-ego to tap experienced scumbags from an existing entity.

Like I said, a union can extract more than not having a union during good times and can mitigate the pain more than without a union during bad times. Many regionals negotiated concessions in order to prevent their flying from being rebid. And now that times are good (because ALPA pushed the ATP rule), pay is being negotiated up, bonuses are being turned into pay rates, first year pay has skyrocketed, work rules have improved. All while much of the flying is staying put.

Basically what I’m saying is that a union will make hay when it can and reduce the pain when it must, more so than any regional would be able to do without a union. If you think it’s bad right now, imagine how much worse it would be if all regionals were non-union!
Nevjets is offline  
Old 04-28-2019, 05:49 PM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Skyhawk121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
Again, the pilot shortage is due to the ATP rule.

I have to disagree with this. While it would help the shortage not have as large of an impact if the hour requirement was not where it currently is, if you look at any of the data out there, the shortage is primarily "due" to the amount of mandatory retirements taking place over a decade or so.
Skyhawk121 is offline  
Old 04-28-2019, 06:32 PM
  #256  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 24
Default Beautifully said. Thanks

Originally Posted by Floy View Post
I'm sorry that the experience has left you with a negative feeling however,

I'd ask pilots what training/checking standards exactly, should a part 121 airline have? It's all relative really. When I went through initial there were no policy provisions AT ALL regarding a new hire getting extra time. You were expected to pass in the time allotted and were only given extra under extenuating circumstances. My SIM partner had issues in his family life and was given every conceivable option to work through it...back then.

I upgraded during the "up or out" times. This means that I, along with every other pilot that upgraded before me, sat in our oral and our check ride knowing in the back of our minds that a failure was the END. Our career and all aspirations would be over. Perhaps this is the type of performance under pressure required by an airline pilot?

Fast forward to the now where people get upset that they were only allotted 5 extra SIM sessions. 5 extra sessions doubles the number of maneuvers. Or they complain about not having a partner. True that it robs you of being able to learn from others mistakes, assuming you could process those mistakes. Another perspective might be that have an instructor as your partner keeps things flowing smoothly and gives you even more time to work on your own issues. Many different instructors causing lack of cohesion, or perhaps several different perspectives to figure out the best way to get through.

It pains me more than I can verbalize when someone cant get through. I mean real pain being experienced. But my pain has been reduced over the years watching more and more the feeling that pilots coming in believe that they are owed something from training. I admit that the industry is doing guys no favors by hiring them with 1000 hours and no turbine time but I have seen pilots being given every possible chance and extension to get through. How someone could see fault in that is perplexing. Pilots need to assess themselves and their abilities. Remember also that pilots are offered the option of resigning so as to keep training failures from their PRIA.

I truly believe, as was stated before that some people simply cant do this job. They may have started too late, or they may simply have a different skill set. But before one gets too bent about the policy, perhaps they should recall that there are real lives depending on the proficiency in the flight deck. If one cant get through with 3 strikes, or with double the sim time, or if I have to take the controls from from a pilot on a short approach because they cant get stable, it might be that complaining about the Skywest training department is not where one should be focusing their energy.

I dont know if Skywest has the BEST training department. I only have one point of view and nothing to compare to. I can say however, without doubt that no pilot has failed out for lack of being given a real opportunity to succeed, within a policy that was never so giving in the history of part 121 airline training.
Love this.
Artifact is offline  
Old 04-28-2019, 09:35 PM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by Skyhawk121 View Post
I have to disagree with this. While it would help the shortage not have as large of an impact if the hour requirement was not where it currently is, if you look at any of the data out there, the shortage is primarily "due" to the amount of mandatory retirements taking place over a decade or so.

I should correct myself and say that it’s actually a pay shortage...for now. But I do agree that both ATP and pilot retirements contribute to that shortage.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 04-29-2019, 06:55 AM
  #258  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,290
Default

Originally Posted by Skyhawk121 View Post
I have to disagree with this. While it would help the shortage not have as large of an impact if the hour requirement was not where it currently is, if you look at any of the data out there, the shortage is primarily "due" to the amount of mandatory retirements taking place over a decade or so.
Yes. The shortage at the entry level is more due to faster movement, plus some generational issues, ie some millenials not interested in a job with dues up front, no dope allowed, rough schedules, dress codes, etc.

There is probably a slim segment of potential entry level pilots who would go for it if they could skip the whole CFI drill and go right to an RJ, but I think that's a small sliver of the demographic, ie re-instating 250 hour airline pilots would not make any significant difference.

The biggest barriers are cost of entry, ie training and also opportunity cost for career-changers. The fastest "fix" would be airlines funding flight training, and I think that's probably coming before too long. If they fund it (maybe all, but probably partial) they can call the tune, ie CFI at their academy and the fly for their regional.

Last edited by rickair7777; 04-29-2019 at 08:59 AM. Reason: typo
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-29-2019, 07:53 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 529
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes. The shortage at the entry level is more due to faster movement, plus some generational issues, ie some millenials not interested in a job with dues up front, no dope allowed, rough schedules, dress codes, etc.

There is probably a slim segment of potential entry level pilots who would go for it if they could skip the whole CFI drill and go right to an RJ, but I think that's a small sliver of the demographic, ie re-instating 250 hour airline pilots would not make any significant difference.

The biggest barriers are cost of entry, ie training and also opportunity cost for career-changers. The fastest "fix" would be airlines funding flight training, and I think that's probably coming before too long. If they fund it (maybe all, but probably partial) they can call the tune, ie CFI at their academy and the fly for their regional.
Spot on. I'd also add that the military recruits are filling the gap and keeping our classes full. Apparently army,navy and air force are all in damage control mode over rampant attrition and many of those aviators are coming here for recency and to check the 121 box. CRJ FOs are getting base of choice within 3 months so it's a no brainer why someone would come here over the alternatives. All we hear is republic and skywest and endeavor classes are full but howabout everywhere else. Without industry wide data it's impossible to gauge whether or not their is a supply issue; as it certainly seems there is none at skywest.

Last edited by rickair7777; 04-29-2019 at 08:59 AM. Reason: typo in quote
TimetoClimb is offline  
Old 04-29-2019, 09:13 AM
  #260  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,290
Default

Originally Posted by TimetoClimb View Post
Spot on. I'd also add that the military recruits are filling the gap and keeping our classes full. Apparently army,navy and air force are all in damage control mode over rampant attrition and many of those aviators are coming here for recency and to check the 121 box. CRJ FOs are getting base of choice within 3 months so it's a no brainer why someone would come here over the alternatives. All we hear is republic and skywest and endeavor classes are full but howabout everywhere else. Without industry wide data it's impossible to gauge whether or not their is a supply issue; as it certainly seems there is none at skywest.
I think the military flow will slow and reach a stable steady state soon.

Right now there is a pool of mil pilots who previously passed on airline opportunities, and are now signing up. When that pool is exhausted (soon), the military only takes in X number of new pilots per year. Those pilots will get out only at specific career gates, and most will go to airlines at the point or not at all. That flow and the gates will remain steady state unless the military makes a big structural change (could happen, for any of several reasons).
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BFMthisA10
Air Wisconsin
24
11-03-2021 08:12 PM
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
okieskies99
United
4
07-03-2017 11:55 PM
blaquehawk99
Flight Schools and Training
29
06-11-2015 09:51 AM
Nevets
Regional
80
07-30-2009 07:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices