Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2014, 09:19 AM
  #4991  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Cessna 150 Left seat
Posts: 430
Default

Does this possibly mean less hiring for Skywest now?
SongMan is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 09:26 AM
  #4992  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by SongMan View Post
Does this possibly mean less hiring for Skywest now?
Not even slightly

I'll say it again, there is absolutely no reduction in flying in SFO this summer. In fact, there is a scheduled increase this summer than what would be considered normal. The EMB is the second most profitable aircraft in the fleet. There will be no retirement or groundings of EMBs. That being said, there is a strategic plan in place to compensate for the runway closures. This plan is creating the anomalies you are seeing. It will all work itself out. That is all I can say.
NVUS is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 09:39 AM
  #4993  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: RJ right-seat warmer
Posts: 632
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS View Post
That being said, there is a strategic plan in place to compensate for the runway closures.
Helicopters! Big ones!
kfahmi is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 09:40 AM
  #4994  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: RJ right-seat warmer
Posts: 632
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS View Post
There will be no retirement or groundings of EMBs. .
Yet at the same time, the fiscal statement is talking about 6 planned EMB retirements by end of year...?
kfahmi is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 09:46 AM
  #4995  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Another RJ FO
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by SongMan View Post
Does this possibly mean less hiring for Skywest now?
In most CRJ bases we're negative on reserves on both the FO and captain sides. I've seen more red open time this week alone than I have in the previous 2 years combined. About 15 flights have canceled out of ORD in the past week due to staffing.

There's no way hiring is slowing down. Captains are thin and running more upgrade classes means FO staffing will be extremely thin.
rcfd13 is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 09:55 AM
  #4996  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by kfahmi View Post
Yet at the same time, the fiscal statement is talking about 6 planned EMB retirements by end of year...?
Those are aircraft due to come off contract. You'll see hundreds of those on any fiscal statement. Im talking about this summer. SkyWest operates 45 EMBs currently, and they will continue to all summer.
NVUS is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 10:52 AM
  #4997  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: RJ right-seat warmer
Posts: 632
Default

So would it be a safe assumption to say that the odds of getting SFO/CRJ are extremely long (long wait in other bases before landing an SFO/CRJ spot), while the odds of getting SFO/EMB shortly after training just got worse/ longer?
kfahmi is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:39 AM
  #4998  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Another RJ FO
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by kfahmi View Post
So would it be a safe assumption to say that the odds of getting SFO/CRJ are extremely long (long wait in other bases before landing an SFO/CRJ spot), while the odds of getting SFO/EMB shortly after training just got worse/ longer?
Sounds about right. Welcome to being extremely junior in a turbulent industry. Enjoy the ride.
rcfd13 is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:42 AM
  #4999  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,056
Default

From a management perspective, its better to have 40% plus reserve staffing in such a day to day environment than give out lines, have low reserve staffing, then suddenly be hit hard with cxl and delays timing everyone out. Its a temporary way to control costs.
saturn is offline  
Old 05-13-2014, 11:50 AM
  #5000  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by saturn View Post
From a management perspective, its better to have 40% plus reserve staffing in such a day to day environment than give out lines, have low reserve staffing, then suddenly be hit hard with cxl and delays timing everyone out. Its a temporary way to control costs.
Exactly this!
NVUS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices