Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest buying 100 E175

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2013, 07:37 AM
  #41  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,292
Default

Originally Posted by TillerEnvy View Post
The best part is the guys that would bash RAH pilots because of the "engines under the wings" will now be first in line to bid it.

I can't imagine anyone at SKW bidding for it unless it pays more than what they are flying or they can get a better domicile. Unless somebody is just bored and wants to do a training event....

Actually it might be a good move for anyone who been stuck here for years and wants to move on, it would show that you're still trainable.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 07:53 AM
  #42  
patience
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I can't imagine anyone at SKW bidding for it unless it pays more than what they are flying or they can get a better domicile. Unless somebody is just bored and wants to do a training event....

Actually it might be a good move for anyone who been stuck here for years and wants to move on, it would show that you're still trainable.
If the E175 pays the same as the 900, it would work out to be a slight pay raise because currently y'all fly all three jets at different pay rates if you're on the CRJ.

With the E175, I'm assuming you would be flying only the 76-seat jet which pays slightly more than the 50 and 70-seat CRJs.
Systemized is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 08:26 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized View Post
If the E175 pays the same as the 900, it would work out to be a slight pay raise because currently y'all fly all three jets at different pay rates if you're on the CRJ.

With the E175, I'm assuming you would be flying only the 76-seat jet which pays slightly more than the 50 and 70-seat CRJs.
The problem with the new airplane is it will give guys less flexibility in their schedules. The extra pay for 76 seats vs 50 seats isn't worth a damn in comparison to bidding/trip trading.

It will be interesting to see how the bids work out and how many come on line in the first wave of deliveries.
FLowpayFO is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 08:33 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Default

The 175s will go junior on the captain side.
SKYWCRJCA is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 08:41 AM
  #45  
On RSV
 
newcfii's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Gear Puller
Posts: 104
Default

I have heard of some guys saying they fly a real airliner because of the location of the under-wing mounted engine. Seriously? It is actually quite comical! So somebody should inform all of the Delta and AA mad-dog drivers that they are not flying a real airliner because their engines are located aft of the wing.
Come on guys!! Who cares! It is more important to base your career off of pay, QOL, benefits and the company that will provide the best possible movement so that you can MOVE on and OUT to a real airline! As for me, I have chosen not to upgrade at my current airline, which is NOT the best because of QOL. I am hoping that as the future opens up, as I have seen a handful of right seat to right seat movement that this trend will continue. So do not base your decisions on where the engine is, who cares! Base it off of QOL and pay, when it boils down to it, we all work for a REGIONAL Airline, oh, and the 170-175 is still and will always be a REGIONAL jet not a transitional jet!! Who came up with that!?
newcfii is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 08:59 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,219
Default

Any Skywest guys want to take a guess as to the domicile the 175's will be placed?
coryk is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 09:17 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I can't imagine anyone at SKW bidding for it unless it pays more than what they are flying or they can get a better domicile. Unless somebody is just bored and wants to do a training event....

Actually it might be a good move for anyone who been stuck here for years and wants to move on, it would show that you're still trainable.
Exactly. 6 weeks in training? Eff that. I've done two initials here and one recurrent. I have absolutely no desire to do another initial until I upgrade.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 09:36 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jet87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: OO RJ FO
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by coryk View Post
Any Skywest guys want to take a guess as to the domicile the 175's will be placed?
ORD and IAH... Maybe DEN
Jet87 is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 09:52 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
Default

Originally Posted by Jet87 View Post
ORD and IAH... Maybe DEN
I'd say those are good guesses with XJT being reduced out of both IAH and ORD. Small possibility you may see the 175 out of SFO, after all it's a United hub and RAH doesn't have a base that far west.
Slats is offline  
Old 05-23-2013, 10:00 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot View Post
Exactly. 6 weeks in training? Eff that. I've done two initials here and one recurrent. I have absolutely no desire to do another initial until I upgrade.
I'll die a happy man if I never gave to spend another night at the
Candlewood
Low Flyin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
SkyWest
18
06-13-2013 08:33 AM
proletariatav8r
SkyWest
16
02-22-2012 08:23 PM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
stanrhintx
Regional
76
11-10-2006 09:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices