Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2018 | 09:29 PM
  #10501  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They are not contractually responsible for WX CANX, so that's the preferred code. Sometimes it's even halfway true, ie a WX delayed crew times out. The fact that they had no reserves is beside the point.
Yup. I’ve had flights cancel for “weather” after we timed out because there wasn’t reserves.
Old 05-14-2018 | 09:43 PM
  #10502  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dhc8guru
My understanding is a new contract is being worked on.
Yes at no great pace but it’s fine. The more net loss months we have the better for us. Take your time guys and give us a legitimate TA this time please.
Old 05-15-2018 | 02:14 AM
  #10503  
Flogger's Avatar
Part of the problem
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 CA
Default

Originally Posted by hawk21
Yes at no great pace but it’s fine. The more net loss months we have the better for us. Take your time guys and give us a legitimate TA this time please.
It is soooo cute , how you folks refer to it as a TA or contract. Pretending to have a union is absolutely adorable.
Old 05-15-2018 | 06:06 AM
  #10504  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 557
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Flogger
It is soooo cute , how you folks refer to it as a TA or contract. Pretending to have a union is absolutely adorable.
It is in fact a legal contract, signed by both parties. I did a real estate deal last week, didn't have any unions involved in that contract either. The enforcement mechanism is different than with a union.
Old 05-15-2018 | 06:18 AM
  #10505  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flogger
It is soooo cute , how you folks refer to it as a TA or contract. Pretending to have a union is absolutely adorable.
You're adorable, troll.
Old 05-15-2018 | 07:39 AM
  #10506  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It is in fact a legal contract, signed by both parties. I did a real estate deal last week, didn't have any unions involved in that contract either. The enforcement mechanism is different than with a union.
Your real estate transaction was between (most likely) two individuals with the legal authority to represent themselves. The "signed" deal is between Skywest and whom? As they're not a labor union, does SAPA have the legal standing to represent all Skywest pilots with one signature?
Old 05-15-2018 | 07:50 AM
  #10507  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default

Imagine having no life and going on regional airline forums to troll about unions. You all live sad, miserable lives.
Old 05-15-2018 | 08:15 AM
  #10508  
Flogger's Avatar
Part of the problem
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 CA
Default

Originally Posted by ImPilot I Fly
You're adorable, troll.
Guilty!!! And thanks!!
Old 05-15-2018 | 08:16 AM
  #10509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flogger
Guilty!!! And thanks!!
Not a compliment.
Old 05-15-2018 | 08:51 AM
  #10510  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,618
Likes: 557
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BrewCity
Your real estate transaction was between (most likely) two individuals with the legal authority to represent themselves. The "signed" deal is between Skywest and whom? As they're not a labor union, does SAPA have the legal standing to represent all Skywest pilots with one signature?
Yup. RLA rules apply, common-law applies, and do not require a union. I love all you quasi-lawyers and quasi labor-law experts who somehow were led to believe (and fell for it) that you're not an adult and cannot do anything for yourself without a union.

There are plenty of problems at SKW, but the nature of the contract is not one of them. Enforcement is problematic and would require a lawsuit (which SAPA itself probably can't file). That means the company doesn't commit massive wholesale violations because that would probably get enough folks motivated enough to file suit, but they can do small-scale violations which would not be worth a lawsuit (at a union shop these would be grievances).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices